Reference health
A Conserved Motif in the 5.8S Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) Gene is a Useful Diagnostic Marker for Plant Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Sequences
9/9 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 9 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2399880
The its Region of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA: A Valuable Source of Evidence on Angiosperm Phylogeny
resolves10.2307/2419742
Length Variation in the Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Region of Non-Flowering Seed Plants
resolves10.1007/BF00013763
A conserved sequence in internal transcribed spacer 1 of plant nuclear rRNA genes
resolves10.1007/BF00317068
Distribution of RNA editing sites in Oenothera mitochondrial mRNAs and rRNAs
resolves10.1093/nar/20.22.6101
Nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rRNA gene in<i>Canella winterana</i>(Magnoliales; Canellaceae)
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedListon, A. and E. AlvarezBuylla. 1995. Internal transcribed spacer sequences of conifers: ‘there is a fungus among us’. Inoculum 46(3): 26.
no DOI — not checkedRitland, C., K. Ritland, and N.A. Strauss. 1993. Variation in the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1273–1278.
no DOI — not checkedWhite, T. J., T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, pp. 315–322, in PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application. (eds.) M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J., and T. White Academic Press, San Diego.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1007462330699"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1007462330699/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1007462330699)