Reference health

Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit

https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011032013115
CiteStamped reference-health badge
77/77 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

57 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 77 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00252.x
Court Structure, Defense Attorney Use, and Juvenile Court Decisions
resolves10.2307/800532
An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion
resolves10.1177/002242788101800204
Sentencing Versus Prosecutorial Discretion: the Application of a New Disparity Measure
resolves10.2307/2094863
Societal Reaction to Deviants: The Case of Criminal Defendants
resolves10.2307/800605
The Impact of Gender-Based Family Roles on Criminal Sentencing
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01106.x
GENDER AND CRIMINAL COURT OUTCOMES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS*
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01085.x
UNEMPLOYMENT AND PUNISHMENT: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT*
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01256.x
RACE, RACIAL THREAT, AND SENTENCING OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS*
resolves10.1080/07418829100090911
Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy?
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00250.x
Judicial Discretion and Defendant's Sex
resolves10.1016/0047-2352(93)90006-9
Socioeconomic status and the sentencing of the traditional offender
resolves10.2307/3053522
Structure and Practice of Familial-Based Justice in a Criminal Court
resolves10.1177/089124389003001002
RETHINKING JUDICIAL PATERNALISM:
resolves10.1080/07418829500092601
Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature
resolves10.2307/3053588
Holistic Effects in Social Control Decision-Making
resolves10.1525/si.1994.17.1.1
The Effect of Social Class on the Adjudication of Criminal Cases: Class‐linked Behavior Tendencies, Common Sense, and the Interpretive Procedures of Court‐appointed Defense Attorneys
resolves10.1016/S0049-089X(80)80004-4
Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes
resolves10.2307/3053288
Prior Offense Record as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047377
SEX, SENTENCING AND RECONVIGTION
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS*
resolves10.2307/1143795
Justice by Geography: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Variations in Juvenile Justice Administration
resolves10.1177/0022427885022002002
Gender Differences in Informal Processing: A Look at Charge Bargaining and Sentence Reduction in Washington, D.C.
resolves10.2307/796945
Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers
resolves10.2307/1911523
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: A Comment
resolves10.1177/0011128794040004004
Determinate Sentencing and the High Cost of Overblown Rhetoric: The New York Experience
resolves10.1016/0047-2352(87)90018-3
Deviation from sentencing guidelines: The issue of unwarranted disparity
resolves10.1177/106591298403700308
Women as Criminal Defendants: a Test for Paternalism
resolves10.2307/2094896
The Differential Sentencing of White-Collar Offenders in Ten Federal District Courts
resolves10.2307/1912352
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
resolves10.1515/9781400856992.206
Chapter 5. Sample Selection Bias As A Specification Error With An Application To The Estimation Of Labor Supply Functions
resolves10.1080/07418829600092801
Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two southwestern jurisdictions
resolves10.1080/23277556.1991.10871138
The Bail Guidelines Experiment in Dade County, Miami: A Case Study in the Development and Implementation of a Policy Innovation
resolves10.1007/BF01064594
Older and more recent evidence on racial discrimination in sentencing
resolves10.1080/07418829600092831
Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00395.x
Race and Imprisonment Decisions
resolves10.2307/3053604
Social Status and Sentences of Female Offenders
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1982.tb00435.x
WOMEN, CRIME, AND DEPENDENCY <i>An Application of the Theory of Law</i>
resolves10.1177/0022427884021003003
Sex and Criminal Court Dispositions: The Unresolved Controversy
resolves10.2307/2095467
The Sex-Sanctioning Issue: Is it History?
resolves10.2307/1143356
Familial Social Control and Pretrial Sanctions: Does Sex Really Matter?
resolves10.2307/3054036
Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the “Deep-Pockets” Hypothesis
resolves10.2307/1143578
Charging and Plea Bargaining Practices under Determinate Sentencing: An Investigation of the Hydraulic Displacement of Discretion
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00340.x
SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES UNDER DETERMINATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF PREGUIDELINE AND POSTGUIDELINE PRACTICES IN MINNESOTA*
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00258.x
Racial Differences in Criminal Processing: The Consequences of Model Selection on Conclusions About Differential Treatment
resolves10.2307/3053542
Regulated and Unregulated Sentencing Decisions: An Analysis of First-Year Practices Under Minnesota's Felony Sentencing Guidelines
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01501.x
URBAN JUSTICE, RURAL INJUSTICE? URBANIZATION AND ITS EFFECT ON SENTENCING*
resolves10.2307/1144116
The Role of Gender in a Structured Sentencing System: Equal Treatment, Policy Choices, and the Sentencing of Female Offenders under the United States Sentencing Guidelines
resolves10.1080/07418829800093841
A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity
resolves10.1515/9780804780797
The Limits of the Criminal Sanction
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01056.x
POLICY RELEVANCE AND THE FUTURE OF CRIMINOLOGY—The American Society of Criminology. 1990 Presidential Address*
resolves10.2307/2095557
Changing Conceptions of Race: Towards an Account of Anomalous Findings of Sentencing Research
resolves10.2307/20639533
Sentence Disparity, Use of Incarceration, and Plea Bargaining: The Post-Guideline View from the Commission
resolves10.1080/0731129X.1994.9991957
The role of criminal record in the federal sentencing guidelines
resolves10.1515/9780691241852
Punishment
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01048.x
FEMINIST THEORY, CRIME, AND JUSTICE*
resolves10.1177/088740349000400102
Just Deserts, The Severity Of Punishment And Judicial Sentencing Decisions
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01209.x
PUNISHING POLITICAL OFFENDERS: THE EFFECT OF POLITICAL MOTIVE ON FEDERAL SENTENCING DECISIONS*
resolves10.2307/3053666
The Sentencing Decisions of Black and White Judges: Expected and Unexpected Similarities
resolves10.1080/07418829100091071
Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00794.x
THE IMPACT OF THE ETHNICITY AND GENDER OF DEFENDANTS ON THE DECISION TO REJECT OR DISMISS FELONY CHARGES*
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x
GENDER AND IMPRISONMENT DECISIONS
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
THE INTERACTION OF RACE, GENDER, AND AGE IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING: THE PUNISHMENT COST OF BEING YOUNG, BLACK, AND MALE
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01156.x
SENTENCING AND UNWARRANTED DISPARITY: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE LONG‐TERM IMPACT OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN MINNESOTA*
resolves10.1177/0011128793039002001
The Failure of the U.S. Sentencing Commission's Guidelines
resolves10.1093/oso/9780195077209.001.0001
Malign Neglect Race, Crime, And Punishment In America
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01212.x
COURT COMMUNITIES UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DILEMMAS OF FORMAL RATIONALITY AND SENTENCING DISPARITY
resolves10.2307/3097246
The Use and Transformation of Formal Decision-Making Criteria: Sentencing Guidelines, Organizational Contexts, and Case Processing Strategies
resolves10.2307/800519
Direct and Organizational Discrimination in the Sentencing of Drug Offenders
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00248.x
Gender, Police Arrest Decisions, and Notions of Chivalry
resolves10.2307/20639532
Sentencing Disparity and the Guidelines: Taking a Closer Look
resolves10.1111/j.1747-4469.1990.tb00587.x
Class, Status, and the Punishment of White-Collar Criminals
resolves10.2307/2095164
Sentencing the White-Collar Offender: Rhetoric and Reality
resolves10.1080/07418828600089101
Are female felons treated more leniently by the criminal justice system?
resolves10.1177/0011128796042002002
Revising Federal Sentencing Policy: Some Consequences of Expanding Eligibility for Alternative Sanctions
resolves10.1080/07418829600093131
Determinate sentencing: A feminist and postmodern story
resolves10.1177/0022427887024001005
The Changing Forms of Racial/Ethnic Biases in Sentencing
The 57 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBaird, S. C. (1984). Classification of Juveniles in Corrections: A Model Systems Approach, National Council on Crime and Delinquency, Madison, WI.
no DOI — not checkedBaird, S. C. (1985). Classifying juveniles: Making the most of an important management tool. Correct. Today Feb.: 32–38.
no DOI — not checkedBeckett, K. (1997). Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics, Oxford University Press, New York.
no DOI — not checkedBernard, T. J. (1992). The Cycle of Juvenile Justice, Oxford University Press, New York.
no DOI — not checkedBonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In Harland, A. T. (ed.), Choosing Correctional Options That Work, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 18–32.
no DOI — not checkedBrennan, T. (1987). Classification for control in jails and prisons. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 201–248.
no DOI — not checkedChesney-Lind, M. (1997). The Female Offender, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
no DOI — not checkedClark, R. (1971). Crime in America, Irwin and Schuster, New York.
no DOI — not checkedCrenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 14: 139–167.
no DOI — not checkedEisenstein, J., and Jacob, H. (1977). Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts, Little, Brown, Boston, MA.
no DOI — not checkedEmerson, R. M. (1969). Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in Juvenile Court, Aldine, Chicago.
no DOI — not checkedFarganis, S. (1994). Postmodernism and feminism. In Dickens, D. R., and Fontana, A. (eds.), Postmodernism and Social Inquiry, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 101–126.
no DOI — not checkedFeeley, M. (1979). The Process Is the Punishment, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
no DOI — not checkedFeeley, M. (1983). Court Reform on Trial, Basic Books, New York.
no DOI — not checkedFeeley, M., and Simon, J. (1994). Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law. In Nelkin, D. (ed.), The Future of Criminology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 172–201.
no DOI — not checkedFrase, R. (1995). State sentencing guidelines: still going strong. Judicature 78(4):173–179.
no DOI — not checkedFriedman, L. M., and Percival, R. V. (1981). The Roots of Justice: Crime and Punishment in Alameda County, California, 1987–1910, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
no DOI — not checkedGhali, M., and Chesney-Lind, M. (1986). Gender bias and the criminal justice system: An empirical investigation. Sociol., and Soc. Res. 70: 164–171.
no DOI — not checkedGoldkamp, J. S. (1987). Prediction in criminal justice policy development. In Gottfredson, D., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 103–150.
no DOI — not checkedGoldkamp, J. S., and Gottfredson, M. R. (1985). Policy Guidelines for Bail, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
no DOI — not checkedGottfredson, D, M. (1989). Criminological theories: The truth as told by Mark Twain. Adv Crimin. Theory 1: 1–16.
no DOI — not checkedGottfredson, D. M., Wilkins, L. T., and Hoffman, P. B. (1978). Guidelines for Parole and Sentencing: A Policy Control Method, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
no DOI — not checkedGottfredson, M. R., and Gottfredson, D. M. (1980). Decision Making in Criminal Justice, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
no DOI — not checkedGreene, W. (1990). Econometric Analysis, Macmillan, New York.
no DOI — not checkedHawkins, K. (1992). The use of legal discretion: Perspectives from law and social science. In Hawkins, K. (ed.), The Uses of Discretion, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 11–46.
no DOI — not checkedHeaney, G. W. (1991). The reality of guidelines sentencing: No end to disparity. Am. Crim. Law Rev, 28: 161–228.
no DOI — not checkedJohnston, J. B., Kennedy, T. D., and Shuman, I. G. (1987). Gender differences in the sentencing of felony offenders. Fed. Probat. 51: 49–55.
no DOI — not checkedKempf-Leonard, K., and Sontheimer, H. (1995). The role of race in juvenile justice in Pennsylvania. In Leonard, K. K., Pope, C. E., and Feyerherm, W. H. (eds.), Minorities in Juvenile Justice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 98–127.
no DOI — not checkedKing, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs 14: 12–72.
no DOI — not checkedKlein, S., Turner, S., and Petersilia, J. (1988). Racial Equity in Sentencing. RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
no DOI — not checkedLeonard, E. (1982). Women, Crime and Society, Longman, New York.
no DOI — not checkedMenninger, K. (1969). The Crime of Punishment, Viking, New York.
no DOI — not checkedNaffine, N. (1987). Female Crime, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Australia.
no DOI — not checkedNagel, I. H., and Hagan, J. (1982). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice, Vol. 4, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 91–144.
no DOI — not checkedNagel, I. H., Cardascia, J., and Ross, C. E. (1981). Sex differences in the processing of criminal defendants. In Weisberg, D. K. (ed.), Women and the Law: The Socio-Historical Perspective, Vol. 1, Schenkman, Cambridge, MA, pp. 259–282.
no DOI — not checkedNardulli, P. (1978). The Courtroom Elite: An Organizational Perspective on Criminal Justice, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
no DOI — not checkedPetersilia, J. (1983). Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
no DOI — not checkedPetersilia, J. and Turner, S. (1987). Guidelines-based justice: Prediction and racial minorities. In Gottfredson, D. G., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 151–182.
no DOI — not checkedRossi, P. H., and Berk, R. A. (1997). Just Punishments: Federal Guidelines and Public Views Compared, Aldine De Gruyter, New York.
no DOI — not checkedSchuetz, J. (1994). The Logic of Women on Trial, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
no DOI — not checkedSechrest, L. (1987). Classification for treatment. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 293–322.
no DOI — not checkedSilberman, C. (1978). Criminal Violence, Criminal Justice, Random House, New York.
no DOI — not checkedSpohn, C. (1998). Is chivalry dead? A multi-site study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, D.C.
no DOI — not checkedSpohn, C., Welch, S. and Gruhl, J. (1985). Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in convicting and sentencing. Soc. Sci. Q. 66: 178–185.
no DOI — not checkedThe President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967). The Challenge to Crime in a Free Society, U.S. Printing Office, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedTonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Sentencing Commission (1992). Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Sentencing Commission. (1994). Annual Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedVan den Haag, E. (1975). Punishing Criminals: Concerning a very Old and Painful Question, Basic Books, New York.
no DOI — not checkedWalker, S. (1985). Sense and Nonsense about Crime: A Policy Guide, 1st ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
no DOI — not checkedWalker, S. (1994). Sense and Nonsense about Crime and Drugs: A Policy Guide, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
no DOI — not checkedWeibush, R., Baird, S. C., Krisberg, B., and Onek, D. (1995). Risk Assessment and Classifi-cation for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders. In Howell, R., Hawkins, R., Krisberg, B., and Wilson, J. (eds.), Sourcebook on Serious Violent Juvenile Offender, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 171–210.
no DOI — not checkedWilson, James Q. (1975). Thinking About Crime, Basic Books, New York.
no DOI — not checkedWorrall, A. (1981). Out of place: Female offenders in court. Probat. J. 28: 990–993.
no DOI — not checkedWorrall, A. (1990). Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the Criminal Justice System, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
no DOI — not checkedWright, K. N. (1980). The desirability of goal conflict within the criminal justice system. J. Crim. Just. 9: 19–31.
no DOI — not checkedZatz, M. S. (1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing. Criminology 22(2): 141–171.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1011032013115"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1011032013115/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1011032013115/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1011032013115)