Reference health
Long-term population trends in widespread British moths
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-21
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1038/20676
Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems
resolves10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00234.x
An abundance–occupancy time‐lag during the decline of an arctiid tiger moth
resolves10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00258-0
Long-term decline in abundance and distribution of the garden tiger moth ( Arctia caja ) in Great Britain
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00572.x
East Atlantic teleconnection pattern and the decline of a common arctiid moth
resolves10.1098/rspb.1999.0819
Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and decline
resolves10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations
resolves10.2307/3546438
Implications of Interspecific and Intraspecific Abundance-Occupancy Relationships
resolves10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00669.x
Interspecific differences in intraspecific abundance‐range size relationships of British breeding birds
resolves10.1098/rspb.1999.0763
Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly's range margin
resolves10.33338/ef.83965
Intercalibration of different light-traps and bulbs used in moth monitoring in northern Europe
resolves10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00513.x
Detecting decline in a formerly widespread species: how common is the common blue butterfly Polyommatus icarus?
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2311.2000.00271.x
The distribution and decline of a widespread butterfly
<i>Lycaena phlaeas</i>
in a pastoral landscape
resolves10.1038/21181
Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2656.2001.00480.x
Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change
resolves10.1017/S0007485300047829
Effects of light-trap design and illumination on samples of moths in an English woodland
resolves10.2307/4012
Comparative Synoptic Dynamics. I. Relationships Between Inter- and Intra-Specific Spatial and Temporal Variance/Mean Population Parameters
resolves10.1016/0006-3207(95)90065-9
Estimating rates of butterfly decline from distribution maps: The effect of scale
resolves10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01120.x
The conservation of declining butterfly populations in Britain and Europe: priorities, problems and successes
resolves10.1126/science.1095046
Comparative Losses of British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis
resolves10.2307/3565855
Does Solar Energy Control Organic Diversity? Butterflies, Moths and the British Climate
resolves10.1080/00063650109461219
Indexing European bird population trends using results of national monitoring schemes: a trial of a new method
resolves10.1016/0006-3207(93)90380-J
A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: I. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites
resolves10.1016/0006-3207(93)90381-A
A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: II. Site management and habitat selection of key species
resolves10.1038/35102054
Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAndrewartha H. G. and Birch L. C. 1954. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
no DOI — not checkedAsher J., Warren M., Fox R., Harding P., Jeffcoate G. and Jeffcoate S. 2001. The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
no DOI — not checkedDennis R. L. H. 1993. Butterflies and Climate Change, 1st ed Manchester University Press, Manchester.
no DOI — not checkedEmmet A. M. 1991. Life history and habits of the British Lepidoptera. In: Emmet A. M. and Heath J.(eds), The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Harley Books, Colchester, pp. 61–203.
no DOI — not checkedHaines-Young R. 2000. Countryside Survey 2000 – Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
no DOI — not checkedHill J. K., Thomas C. D., Fox R., Moss D. and Huntley B 2001b. Analysing and modelling range changes in UK butterflies. In: Woiwod I. P., Reynolds D. R. and Thomas C. D. (eds), Insect Movement: Mechanisms and Consequences CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 415–441.
no DOI — not checkedLuff M. L. and Woiwod I. P. 1995. Insects as indicators of land use change: a European perspective, focusing on moths and ground beetles. In: Harrington R. and Stork N. E.(eds), Insects in a Changing Environment. Academic Press, London, pp. 399–422.
no DOI — not checkedPannekoek J. and Van Strien A. J. 2001. Trim 3 Manual (TRends & Indices for Monitoring data). Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg.
no DOI — not checkedParmesan C. 2001. Coping with modern times?Insect movement and climate change. In: Woiwod I. P., Reynolds D. R and Thomas C. D.(eds), Insect Movement: Mechanisms and Consequences. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 387–413.
no DOI — not checkedPollard E. and Yates T. 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation, 1st ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
no DOI — not checkedPullin A. S. ed. 1995. Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies, 1st ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
no DOI — not checkedStevens C. J., Dise N. B., Mountford J. O. and Gowing D. J 2004. Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Nature 303: 1876–1879.
no DOI — not checkedWaring P., Townsend M. and Lewington R. 2003. Field Guide to the Moths of Great Britain and Ireland, 1st ed. British Wildlife Publishing, Hook, UK.
no DOI — not checkedWilliams C. B. 1948. The Rothamsted light-trap. Proc. Roy Ent. Soc. Lond. (A)23: 80–85.
no DOI — not checkedWilliams C. B. 1952. Some notes on killing insects for collections and for scienti fi c research. Entomologist 85: 271–279.
no DOI — not checkedWoiwod I. P. 1991. The ecological importance of long-term synoptic monitoring. In: Firbank L. G., Carter N., Darbyshire J. F. and Potts G. R.(eds), The Ecology of Temperate Cereal Fields. Proceedings 32nd Symposium of the British Ecological Society with the Association of Applied Biologists. Blackwell Scienti fi c, Oxford, pp. 275–304.
no DOI — not checkedWoiwod I. P. and Harrington R. 1994. Flying in the face of change: the Rothamsted Insect Survey. In: Leigh R. and Johnston A.(eds), Long-term Experiments in Agricultural and Ecological Sciences. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 321–342.
no DOI — not checkedYoung M. R. 1997. The Natural History of Moths. T. & A. D Poyser, London
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/b%3Ajico.0000045810.36433.c6"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/b%3Ajico.0000045810.36433.c6/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/b%3Ajico.0000045810.36433.c6)