Reference health
Shifting Republican views on climate change through targeted advertising
24/24 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 24 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4
Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101394
Messaging for environmental action: The role of moral framing and message source
resolves10.1177/1075547019862559
Promoting Persuasion With Ideologically Tailored Science Messages: A Novel Approach to Research on Emphasis Framing
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
resolves10.7916/D8J966CS
Positive, Small, Homogeneous, and Durable: Political Persuasion in Response to Information
resolves10.1177/1948550620927269
How USA-Centric Is Psychology? An Archival Study of Implicit Assumptions of Generalizability of Findings to Human Nature Based on Origins of Study Samples
resolves10.1126/sciadv.abc4046
The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments
resolves10.1017/S0003055417000363
The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments
resolves10.1037/a0015108
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
resolves10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public
resolves10.1017/pan.2017.27
The Design of Field Experiments With Survey Outcomes: A Framework for Selecting More Efficient, Robust, and Ethical Designs
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedIPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018); https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
no DOI — not checkedLeiserowitz, A. et al. Politics & Global Warming, April 2020 (Yale Univ. and George Mason Univ., Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, 2020).
no DOI — not checkedGerber, A. S. & Green, D. P. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation (WW Norton, 2012).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41558-021-01070-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41558-021-01070-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41558-021-01070-1)