Reference health

Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z
CiteStamped reference-health badge
68/68 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 68 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7
The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies
resolves10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5
Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios
resolves10.1038/nclimate2572
Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C
resolves10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6
Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b
Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs?
resolves10.1038/s41467-019-13067-8
Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies
resolves10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y
Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.070
Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales
resolves10.1126/science.aaw1845
Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Transform global energy
resolves10.1038/nclimate2564
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
resolves10.1038/nenergy.2017.110
The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.035
Assessing the progress toward lower priced long range battery electric vehicles
resolves10.1126/science.aaz8060
Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization
resolves10.1038/nclimate2392
Betting on negative emissions
resolves10.1126/science.aah4567
The trouble with negative emissions
resolves10.1038/nclimate1416
Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment
resolves10.1038/nenergy.2017.140
The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change
resolves10.1038/nclimate1576
Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection
resolves10.5194/gmd-14-6571-2021
REMIND2.1: transformation and innovation dynamics of the energy-economic system within climate and sustainability limits
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/abdf07
Deep decarbonisation of buildings energy services through demand and supply transformations in a 1.5°C scenario
resolves10.1007/s10666-021-09760-y
Coupling a Detailed Transport Model to the Integrated Assessment Model REMIND
resolves10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z
Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets
resolves10.5194/gmd-12-1299-2019
MAgPIE 4 – a modular open-source framework for modeling global land systems
resolves10.1002/pip.3189
Impact of weighted average cost of capital, capital expenditure, and other parameters on future utility‐scale PV levelised cost of electricity
resolves10.1038/s41560-021-00810-z
Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050
resolves10.1038/s41467-020-15414-6
Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement
resolves10.22022/SR15/08-2018.15429
IAMC 1.5°C Scenario Explorer and Data hosted by IIASA
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives
resolves10.1038/s41558-021-01032-7
Potential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/abbd02
The CO<sub>2</sub> reduction potential for the European industry via direct electrification of heat supply (power-to-heat)
resolves10.1038/s41560-018-0294-x
Technological, economic and environmental prospects of all-electric aircraft
resolves10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080
How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies
resolves10.3390/su10072243
Decarbonization Pathways for International Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Impact Assessment
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.139
How much energy will buildings consume in 2100? A global perspective within a scenario framework
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.010
Deriving life cycle assessment coefficients for application in integrated assessment modelling
resolves10.1126/science.1168475
Implications of Limiting CO <sub>2</sub> Concentrations for Land Use and Energy
resolves10.1038/nclimate1695
Last chance for carbon capture and storage
resolves10.1039/C7EE02342A
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
resolves10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.115
Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.012
The MESSAGE Integrated Assessment Model and the ix modeling platform (ixmp): An open framework for integrated and cross-cutting analysis of energy, climate, the environment, and sustainable development
resolves10.1007/s10287-007-0046-z
ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure
resolves10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-10
Mitigation Strategies and Costs of Climate Protection: The Effects of ETC in the Hybrid Model MIND
resolves10.1007/s10287-007-0042-3
Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.012
Decarbonizing global power supply under region-specific consideration of challenges and options of integrating variable renewables in the REMIND model
resolves10.1007/s10479-016-2340-z
Solution algorithms for regional interactions in large-scale integrated assessment models of climate change
resolves10.1007/s10584-012-0618-y
Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence?
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.088
Assessing global fossil fuel availability in a scenario framework
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.011
Using the sun to decarbonize the power sector: The economic potential of photovoltaics and concentrating solar power
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.015
An improved global wind resource estimate for integrated assessment models
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.021
Application of a high-detail energy system model to derive power sector characteristics at high wind and solar shares
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222
Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system
resolves10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.022
Electricity Storage and the Renewable Energy Transition
resolves10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.001
Impacts of considering electric sector variability and reliability in the MESSAGE model
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.11.008
Steel all over the world: Estimating in-use stocks of iron for 200 countries
resolves10.1039/C8EE01157E
The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.013
Long-term marginal abatement cost curves of non-CO2 greenhouse gases
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm
resolves10.5194/acp-11-1457-2011
Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications
resolves10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00336.x
Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: a spatially explicit mathematical programming approach
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x
Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance
resolves10.1111/agec.12088
Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.003
Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model
resolves10.1038/nclimate2444
Land-use protection for climate change mitigation
resolves10.1038/ncomms4858
Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001
Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production
resolves10.1038/s41586-019-1541-4
A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedClarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedDavis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).
no DOI — not checkedRenewable Power Generation Costs in 2019 (IRENA, 2020).
no DOI — not checkedTrends and Developments in Electric Vehicle Markets – Global EV Outlook 2021 – Analysis (IEA, 2021).
no DOI — not checkedRogelj, J. et al. in Global Warming of 1.5 °C Ch. 2 (IPCC, 2018).
no DOI — not checkedJia, G. et al. in Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 2 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
no DOI — not checkedGlobal Status Report of CCS (Global CCS Institute, 2020); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/
no DOI — not checkedNordhaus, W. D. & Yang, Z. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 741–765 (1996).
no DOI — not checkedAmann, M. (ed.) The GAINS Integrated Assessment Model (EC4MACS, 2012).
no DOI — not checkedDirnacher, A., Mutel, C. L., Terlouw, T. & Sacchi, R. Coupling integrated assessment models and ecoinvent for prospective environmental impact assessment. GitHub https://github.com/romainsacchi/premise/blob/master/docs/introduction.rst (accessed 1 November 2021).
no DOI — not checkedLife Cycle Inventory Database v.3.7 (Ecoinvent, accessed 1 November 2021); https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/data-releases/ecoinvent-3-7/
no DOI — not checkedGoedkoop, M. et al. ReCiPe 2008 (version 1.08). Report I: characterisation (RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands, 2013); https://www.rivm.nl/documenten/a-lcia-method-which-comprises-harmonised-category-indicators-at-midpoint-and-endpoint
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z)