Reference health
Artificial intelligence in radiology
101/101 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 101 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1126/science.aam6960
DeepStack: Expert-level artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker
resolves10.3390/machines5010006
Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles
resolves10.1613/jair.1.11222
Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts
resolves10.1038/nature21056
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
resolves10.1001/jama.2016.17216
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
resolves10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631
The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine
resolves10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis
resolves10.1038/ncomms5006
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
resolves10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.015
CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0169172
Associations of Radiomic Data Extracted from Static and Respiratory-Gated CT Scans with Disease Recurrence in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with SBRT
resolves10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0122
Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer
resolves10.1007/s00330-008-1159-7
The radiologist’s conundrum: benefits and costs of increasing CT capacity and utilization
resolves10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007
The Effects of Changes in Utilization and Technological Advancements of Cross-Sectional Imaging on Radiologist Workload
resolves10.1148/81.2.185
The Coding of Roentgen Images for Computer Analysis as Applied to Lung Cancer
resolves10.18383/j.tom.2016.00211
Deep Feature Transfer Learning in Combination with Traditional Features Predicts Survival among Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma
resolves10.1038/srep24454
Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_56
Iterative Multi-domain Regularized Deep Learning for Anatomical Structure Detection and Segmentation from Ultrasound Images
resolves10.1038/s41598-017-05300-5
Location Sensitive Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities
resolves10.1186/s13550-017-0260-9
Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18F-FDG PET/CT images
resolves10.1148/radiol.11091710
Computer-aided Diagnosis: How to Move from the Laboratory to the Clinic
resolves10.2214/AJR.12.10187
Impact of Computer-Aided Detection Systems on Radiologist Accuracy With Digital Mammography
resolves10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
resolves10.1117/12.2254423
Convolutional neural network based deep-learning architecture for prostate cancer detection on multiparametric magnetic resonance images
resolves10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007
Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions
resolves10.1109/TMI.2004.824224
Improved Watershed Transform for Medical Image Segmentation Using Prior Information
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0144200
A Probabilistic Atlas of Diffuse WHO Grade II Glioma Locations in the Brain
resolves10.1109/ICIP.2012.6466916
A coupled schema of probabilistic atlas and statistical shape and appearance model for 3D prostate segmentation in MR images
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_55
Deep Learning for Multi-task Medical Image Segmentation in Multiple Modalities
resolves10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.080
Ground-glass opacities: A curable disease but a big challenge for surgeons
resolves10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.06.004
Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Imaging
resolves10.1177/0161734615589080
Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis to the Sonographic Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes
resolves10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.09.001
A fully automatic computer aided diagnosis system for peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging
resolves10.4329/wjr.v4.i4.128
The 7th lung cancer TNM classification and staging system: Review of the changes and implications
resolves10.1038/srep26286
Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis
resolves10.1038/srep46450
Accurate and reproducible invasive breast cancer detection in whole-slide images: A Deep Learning approach for quantifying tumor extent
resolves10.1200/JCO.1997.15.12.3507
Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Français d'Immunothérapie of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.
resolves10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.004
New Opportunities in Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Change Detection and Characterization
resolves10.1007/s10278-006-1038-1
Part 1. Automated Change Detection and Characterization in Serial MR Studies of Brain-Tumor Patients
resolves10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123009
Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?
resolves10.1007/978-3-662-54345-0_25
A Deep Learning Architecture for Limited-Angle Computed Tomography Reconstruction
resolves10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008
Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration – A deep learning approach
resolves10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.008
Radiology Report Clarity: A Cohort Study of Structured Reporting Compared With Conventional Dictation
resolves10.1007/s13244-011-0066-7
Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR)
resolves10.2214/AJR.14.14054
Quantitative Radiology Reporting in Oncology: Survey of Oncologists and Radiologists
resolves10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574575
Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems.
resolves10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.009
Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Implementation, Integration & Benefits in an Integrated Health System
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_47
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Brain Lesion Segmentation with Adversarial Networks
resolves10.1109/TMI.2016.2532122
Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring
resolves10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
resolves10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
resolves10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037556
Comparison of hand-craft feature based SVM and CNN based deep learning framework for automatic polyp classification
resolves10.1038/s41551-016-0027
Rapid intraoperative histology of unprocessed surgical specimens via fibre-laser-based stimulated Raman scattering microscopy
resolves10.1109/TMI.2016.2528120
AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images
resolves10.1038/s41698-017-0022-1
Precision histology: how deep learning is poised to revitalize histomorphology for personalized cancer care
resolves10.4103/2153-3539.186902
Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases
resolves10.1186/s12859-016-1334-9
DeepGene: an advanced cancer type classifier based on deep learning and somatic point mutations
resolves10.1038/nbt.3300
Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedXiong, W. et al. Toward human parity in conversational speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio Speech Language Process. 25, 2410–2423 (2017).
no DOI — not checkedWu, W. et al. Exploratory study to identify radiomics classifiers for lung cancer histology. Front. Oncol. 6, 71 (2016).
no DOI — not checkedHaug, P. J. Uses of diagnostic expert systems in clinical care. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care, 379–383 (1993).
no DOI — not checkedVeeraraghavan, H. MO-A-207B-01: Radiomics: Segmentation & feature extraction techniques. Med. Phys. 43, 3694–3694 (2016).
no DOI — not checkedNagaraj, S., Rao, G. N. & Koteswararao, K. The role of pattern recognition in computer-aided diagnosis and computer-aided detection in medical imaging: a clinical validation. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 8, 18–22 (2010).
no DOI — not checkedHan, X. et al. Atlas-based auto-segmentation of head and neck CT images. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 11, 434–441 (2008).
no DOI — not checkedLong, J., Shelhamer, E. & Darrell, T. in 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 3431–3440 (Boston, MA, USA, 2015).
no DOI — not checkedChampaign, J. L. & Cederbom, G. J. Advances in breast cancer detection with screening mammography. Ochsner J. 2, 33–35 (2000).
no DOI — not checkedEl-Baz, A. et al. Computer-aided diagnosis systems for lung cancer: challenges and methodologies. Int. J. Biomed. Imag. 2013, 942353 (2013).
no DOI — not checkedSohn, K., Shang, W. & Lee, H. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014) (eds Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N. D. & Weinberger, K. Q.) 2141–2149 (Montreal, Canada, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedPipatsrisawat, T., Gacic, A., Franchetti, F., Puschel, M. & Moura, J. M. F. in Proceedings. (ICASSP ‘05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005 v/153–v/156 (Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005).
no DOI — not checkedNgiam, J. et al. in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning 689–696 (Bellevue, WA, USA, 2011).
no DOI — not checkedLevy, M. A. & Rubin, D. L. Tool support to enable evaluation of the clinical response to treatment. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2008, 399–403 (2008).
no DOI — not checkedShin, H.-C. et al. in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2497–2506 (Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016).
no DOI — not checkedGoodfellow, I. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014) (eds Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N. D. & Weinberger, K. Q.) 2672–2680 (Montreal, Canada, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedKingma, D. P. & Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Preprint at arXiv, 1312.6114 (2013).
no DOI — not checkedZhang, P., Wang, F. & Zheng, Y. in 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) 578–582 (Melbourne, Australia, 2017).
no DOI — not checkedFord, R. A., Price, W. & Nicholson, I. I. Privacy and accountability in black-box medicine. Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 23, 1 (2016).
no DOI — not checkedMcMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S. & y Arcas, B. A. in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 1273–1282 (Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2017).
no DOI — not checkedKevin Zhou, S., Greenspan, H. & Shen, D. Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis. (Academic Press, 2017).
no DOI — not checkedBejnordi, B. E. et al. in 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) 929–932 (Melbourne, Australia, 2017).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5)