Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 50 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/agec.12089The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models
resolves10.1073/pnas.1402183111Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015029Selection of appropriate calculators for landscape-scale greenhouse gas assessment for agriculture and forestry
resolves10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.8Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses
resolves10.1098/rstb.2015.0316Reconciling agriculture, carbon and biodiversity in a savannah transformation frontier
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use
resolves10.1002/2013GB004593Global patterns of ecosystem carbon flux in forests: A biometric data‐based synthesis
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12152Bioenergy crop greenhouse gas mitigation potential under a range of management practices
resolves10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.012How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture
resolves10.1111/gcb.13337Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison
resolves10.1021/es101946tGreenhouse Gas Emissions from Biofuels’ Indirect Land Use Change Are Uncertain but May Be Much Greater than Previously Estimated
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.xEvaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model
resolves10.1073/pnas.1011078107Trading carbon for food: Global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034001Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology
resolves10.1126/science.1151861Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
resolves10.1038/srep04062Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land
resolves10.5194/bg-13-5661-2016Soil carbon response to land-use change: evaluation of a global vegetation model using observational meta-analyses
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.xTemporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone - carbon response functions as a model approach
resolves10.1111/gcb.13226Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (<scp>T</scp>rop<scp>F</scp>or<scp>C</scp>‐db)
resolves10.1029/2007GB002952Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
resolves10.1073/pnas.1308149110Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems
resolves10.1007/s10113-016-0936-0Soil carbon stocks after conversion of Amazonian tropical forest to grazed pasture: importance of deep soil layers
resolves10.1111/gcb.12906From forest to cropland and pasture systems: a critical review of soil organic carbon stocks changes in Amazonia
resolves10.1111/gcb.13431Grazing intensity significantly affects belowground carbon and nitrogen cycling in grassland ecosystems: a meta‐analysis
resolves10.1029/2008GB003299Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines
resolves10.1021/es502374fGreenhouse Gas Mitigation on Marginal Land: A Quantitative Review of the Relative Benefits of Forest Recovery versus Biofuel Production
resolves10.4155/cmt.13.77Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool
resolves10.1111/gcb.13904A large‐area, spatially continuous assessment of land cover map error and its impact on downstream analyses
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSearchinger, T. et al. Creating a Sustainable Food Future. A Menu of Solutions to Sustainably Feed More Than 9 Billion People by 2050 (World Resources Institute, Washington, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedEdenhofer, O. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 1–30 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. EX-Ante Carbon-balance Tool (EX-ACT)
http://www.fao.org/tc/exact/ex-act-home/en/
(2017).
no DOI — not checkedGerber, P. et al. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2013).
no DOI — not checkedAudsley, E. et al. How Low Can We Go? An Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the UK Food System and the Scope Reduction by 2050 (WWF-UK, 2009).
no DOI — not checkedRanganathan, J. et al. Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future (World Resources Institute, Washington, 2016).
no DOI — not checkedMoll, S. & Remond-Tiedrez, I. CO
2
Emissions Induced by EU’s Final Use of Products are Estimated to Be 9 Tonnes per Capita (Eurostat, Luxembourg, 2011).
no DOI — not checkedNeumann, C. G., Demment, M. W., Maretzki, A., Drorbaugh, N. & Galvin, K. A. in Livestock in a Changing Landscape, Volume 1: Drivers, Consequences, and Responses (eds Steinfeld, H. et al.) 221–248 (Island Press, Washington, 2010).
no DOI — not checkedRegmi, A., Deepak, M. S., Seale, J. L. Jr & Bernstein, J. in Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade (ed. Regmi, A.) 14–22 (United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, 2001).
no DOI — not checkedCalifornia Air Resources Board. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Final Regulation Order Table 5,
https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2015/lcfs2015/lcfsfinalregorder.pdf
(2015).
no DOI — not checkedEggleston, H. S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K. (eds) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IGES, Hayama, 2006).
no DOI — not checkedTrumper, K. et al. The Natural Fix? The role of Ecosystems in Climate Mitigation (UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 2009).
no DOI — not checkedYou, L. et al. Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM) 2005 v3.2
http://MapSPAM.info
(2017).
no DOI — not checkedFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Database
http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home
(2016).
no DOI — not checkedYu, Z., Loisel, J., Brosseau, D. P., Beilman, D. W. & Hunt, S. J. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L13402 (2010).
no DOI — not checkedHiraishi, T. et al. (eds) 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands (IPCC, Geneva, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedBiancalani, R. & Avagyan, A. Towards Climate-Responsible Peatlands Management (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedWirsenius, S. Human Use of Land and Organic Materials. Modeling the Turnover of Biomass in the Global Food System. PhD Thesis, Chalmers Univ. of Technology and Göteborg Univ. (2000).
no DOI — not checkedLe Mouël, C. Agrimonde-Terra Foresight: Land Use and Food Security in 2050 (CIRAD/INRA, Paris, 2016).
no DOI — not checkedLe Mouël, C. et al. Le Système Agricole et Alimentaire de la Région Afrique du Nord–Moyen-Orient à L’Horizon 2050 : Projections de Tendance et Analyse de Sensibilité (INRA, Paris/Rennes, 2015).
no DOI — not checkedEPA. Life-Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Renewable Fuels (2010).
no DOI — not checkedAdhya, T. K., Linquist, B., Searchinger, T. D., Wassmann, R. & Yan, X. Wetting and Drying: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Saving Water from Rice Production (World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FertiStat
http://www.fao.org/tempref/agl/agll/docs/fertusebycrop.xls
(2006; accessed 2016).
no DOI — not checkedMyhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).
no DOI — not checkedOpio, C. et al. Greenhouse Gas Emission from Ruminant Supply Chains: A Global Life Cycle Assessment (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2013).
no DOI — not checkedMacLeod, M. et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Pig and Chicken Supply Chains: A Global Life Cycle Assessment (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2013).
no DOI — not checkedEdwards, R., Larivé, J. F., Rickeard, D. & Weindorf, W. Well-to-Tank Report Version 4.a: JEC Well-to-Wheels Analysis (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedKlasing, K. C. Displacement ratios for US corn DDGS (International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, 2012).
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.