Reference health
A ‘Landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats
58/58 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 58 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1126/science.1127863
Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands
resolves10.1126/science.1255957
Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers
resolves10.1126/science.1257259
Extinctions of aculeate pollinators in Britain and the role of large-scale agricultural changes
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x
Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land‐use change
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.020
Pollinator habitat enhancement: Benefits to other ecosystem services
resolves10.1051/apido/2010024
Landscape enhancement of floral resources for honey bees in agro-ecosystems
resolves10.1111/cobi.12536
The role of agri‐environment schemes in conservation and environmental management
resolves10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.015
Spatial autocorrelation in honeybee foraging activity reveals optimal focus scale for predicting agro-environmental scheme efficiency
resolves10.1111/1365-2664.12479
Local and landscape‐level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x
Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri‐environment schemes in five European countries
resolves10.1111/ele.12128
Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri‐environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss – a meta‐analysis
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01259.x
Diversity of flower‐visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x
Ecological Effectiveness of Agri‐Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscapes in The Netherlands
resolves10.1093/conphys/cot001
What is conservation physiology? Perspectives on an increasingly integrated and essential science
resolves10.1093/icb/icv001
The Power of Physiology in Changing Landscapes: Considerations for the Continued Integration of Conservation and Physiology
resolves10.1111/ele.12581
Bumble bee colony dynamics: quantifying the importance of land use and floral resources for colony growth and queen production
resolves10.1007/s004420100803
Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats
resolves10.1890/11-1006.1
Landscape‐scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees
resolves10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.05
ECOBEE: a tool for long-term honey bee colony monitoring at the landscape scale in West European intensive agroecosystems
resolves10.1093/ee/nvw005
Bee Abundance and Nutritional Status in Relation to Grassland Management Practices in an Agricultural Landscape
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0152685
Linking Measures of Colony and Individual Honey Bee Health to Survival among Apiaries Exposed to Varying Agricultural Land Use
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.030
Land use in the Northern Great Plains region of the U.S. influences the survival and productivity of honey bee colonies
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0153531
Intensively Cultivated Landscape and Varroa Mite Infestation Are Associated with Reduced Honey Bee Nutritional State
resolves10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.01
A national survey of managed honey bee 2012–2013 annual colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership
resolves10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.03.018
Meeting the energetic demands of insect diapause: Nutrient storage and utilization
resolves10.1073/pnas.0502681103
Reproductive protein protects functionally sterile honey bee workers from oxidative stress
resolves10.1016/0022-1910(82)90023-3
Changes in weight of the pharyngeal gland and haemolymph titres of juvenile hormone, protein and vitellogenin in worker honey bees
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0072016
Influence of Pollen Nutrition on Honey Bee Health: Do Pollen Quality and Diversity Matter?
resolves10.1890/12-0976.1
The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using a d‐separation test
resolves10.1603/0022-0493(2004)097[0741:APIWHB]2.0.CO;2
Altered Physiology in Worker Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Infested with the Mite <I>Varroa destructor</I> (Acari: Varroidae): A Factor in Colony Loss During Overwintering?
resolves10.1016/j.jip.2012.06.006
Nutritional limitation and resistance to opportunistic Aspergillus parasites in honey bee larvae
resolves10.1890/14-1011.1
Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds
resolves10.1007/s13592-012-0125-1
Territorial biodiversity and consequences on physico-chemical characteristics of pollen collected by honey bee colonies
resolves10.1051/apido:2008017
Nutritive value of 15 single pollens and pollen mixes tested on larvae produced by bumblebee workers (<i>Bombus terrestris</i>, Hymenoptera: Apidae)
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x
How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
resolves10.1111/1365-2664.12257
Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services provided to a pollination‐dependent crop
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01249.x
Comparing the efficacy of agri‐environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins
resolves10.1111/ele.12082
A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.034
Effectiveness of new agri-environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes
resolves10.1890/14-1748.1
Native wildflower plantings support wild bee abundance and diversity in agricultural landscapes across the United States
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.022
Pollinator-friendly management does not increase the diversity of farmland bees and wasps
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0093495
Waggle Dance Distances as Integrative Indicators of Seasonal Foraging Challenges
resolves10.1007/BF01198656
Comparison of diagnostic methods for detection of low infestation levels ofVarroa jacobsoni in honey-bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
resolves10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.07.016
The ontogeny of immunity: Development of innate immune strength in the honey bee (Apis mellifera)
resolves10.1007/s00114-008-0378-8
Pheromonal regulation of starvation resistance in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera)
resolves10.1073/pnas.0403073101
Reproductive ground plan may mediate colony-level selection effects on individual foraging behavior in honey bees
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDecourtye, A. et al. Why Enhancement of Floral Resources in Agro-Ecosystems Benefit Honeybees and Beekeepers? In Ecosystems Biodiversity (eds Grillo, O. & Venora, G. ) Ch. 16, 371–388 (InTech, 2011).
no DOI — not checkedWilliams, N. M., Minckley, R. L. & Silveira, F. A. Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conserv Ecol 5, 1–21 (2001).
no DOI — not checkedLaurent, M., Hendrikx, P., Ribière-Chabert, M. & Chauzat, M.-P. A pan-European epidemiological study on honeybee colony losses 2012–2014. p.44 (ANSES, 2016).
no DOI — not checkedde Groot, A. P. Protein and amino acid requirements of the honey bee (Apis mellifica L.). Physiol Comp Oecol 3, 197–285 (1953).
no DOI — not checkedTeam, R. D. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (URL http://www.R-project.org/, Vienna, Austria, 2014).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/srep40568"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/srep40568/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1038/srep40568)