Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 62 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01034.x<scp>EMNE</scp>
catch‐up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade‐off between output and innovation capabilities?
resolves10.1057/jibs.2009.95An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment
resolves10.1007/s10490-021-09757-xAssessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy
resolves10.1057/s42214-018-0009-9Thanks but no thanks: State-owned multinationals from emerging markets and host-country policies
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3446688Public Procurement, Regional Integration and the Belt and Road Initiative
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.001Chinese State Capitalism? Rethinking the Role of the State and Business in Chinese Development Cooperation in Africa
resolves10.1057/s41267-018-0165-5State capitalism and performance persistence of business group-affiliated firms: A comparative study of China and India
resolves10.1007/s10490-020-09743-9Home-country government support, the belt and road initiative, and the foreign performance of Chinese state-owned subsidiaries
resolves10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business
resolves10.1002/smj.2985The liability of opaqueness: State ownership and the likelihood of deal completion in international acquisitions by Chinese firms
resolves10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.004The belt and road initiative, cultural friction and ethnicity: Their effects on the export performance of SMEs in China
resolves10.1002/smj.2027Principal‐principal conflicts under weak institutions: A study of corporate takeovers in China
resolves10.5465/amj.2007.24162209Identity, Community, And Audience: How Wholly Owned Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Legitimacy In China
resolves10.1111/j.2042-5805.2013.01062.xThe Two‐Tier Bargaining Model Revisited: Theory and Evidence from
<scp>C</scp>
hina's Natural Resource Investments in
<scp>A</scp>
frica
resolves10.1057/jibs.2014.14Varieties in state capitalism: Outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries
resolves10.1057/jibs.2014.35An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises
resolves10.1002/smj.3022Geopolitical jockeying: Economic nationalism and multinational strategy in historical perspective
resolves10.1057/s41267-018-0198-9Adjusting to and learning from institutional diversity: Toward a capability-building perspective
resolves10.1057/s41267-019-00269-xThe structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise
resolves10.2307/258788Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
resolves10.1057/s42214-020-00056-8Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative
resolves10.1057/s41267-018-0205-1The JIBS 2018 Decade Award: Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business
resolves10.1017/mor.2019.49China's Challenge: Geopolitics, De-Globalization, and the Future of Chinese Business
resolves10.1057/s41267-016-0001-8Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation
resolves10.1007/s42533-019-00026-7Third-party market cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative: progress, challenges, and recommendations
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBalding, C. 2018. Why democracies are turning against Belt and Road. Foreign Affairs, October 24, 2018.
no DOI — not checkedChatzky, A., & McBride, J. 2020. China’s massive Belt and Road Initiative. Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative.
no DOI — not checkedEconomic Intelligence Unit. 2018. Participation of foreign firms in the BRI. HSBC. https://www.business.hsbc.com/belt-and-road/participation-of-foreign-firms-in-the-bri.
no DOI — not checkedEconomy, E. C. 2018. China’s new revolution: The reign of Xi Jinping. Foreign Affairs, 97(3): 60–74.
no DOI — not checkedEurasia Group. 2020. The Digital Silk Road: Expanding China’s digital footprint. Eurasia report, file:///Users/lewislitingan/Downloads/Digital-Silk-Road-Expanding-China-Digital-Footprint-1.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedFerchen, M. 2016. China, economic development, and global security. Center for Global Policy, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_289_Ferchen_China_Final.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedGrosse, R., & Behrman, J. N. 1992. Theory in international business. Transnational Corporations, 1(1): 93–126.
no DOI — not checkedHall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedHillman, J. 2018. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five years later. Statement before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Center for Strategic and International Studies. http://www.iberchina.org/files/2018/obor_csis_hillman_testimony.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedHillman, J. 2021. Competing with China’s Digital Silk Road. Center for Strategic & International Studies 2021 Global Forecast. https://www.csis.org/analysis/competing-chinas-digital-silk-road.
no DOI — not checkedJanssen, P. 2017. Land-locked Laos on track for controversial China rail link. Nikkei Asian Review, June 24, 2017, https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-Relations/Land-lockedLaos-on-track-for-controversial- China-rail-link.
no DOI — not checkedKhanna, P. 2019. Washington is dismissing China’s Belt and Road. That is a huge strategic mistake. April 30, 2019. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/30/washington-is-dismissing-chinas-belt-and-road-thats-a-huge-strategic-mistake-226759.
no DOI — not checkedKhanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2010. Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Review Press.
no DOI — not checkedKPMG. 2019. Charting the course of “belt and road” cooperation together. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/cn/pdf/en/2019/05/synopsis-charting-the-course-of-belt-and-road-cooperation-together.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedLi, X. 2019. China’s pursuit of the “One Belt One Road” initiative—a new world order with Chinese characteristics: Unpacking economic motivations and non-economic consequences of connectivity infrastructure under OBOR. In L. Xing (Ed.), Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
no DOI — not checkedMacaes, B. 2018. Belt and road: A Chinese world order. C Hurst US & Co.
no DOI — not checkedMorries, D. 2020. The three Seas Initiative: A European answer to China’s Belt and Road. The Interpreter. Published on October 26, 2020. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/three-seas-initiative-european-answer-china-s-belt-and-road.
no DOI — not checkedPacatte, W. 2019. Competing to win: a coalition approach to countering the BRI. Center for Strategic and International Studies. December 19, 2019. https://www.csis.org/analysis/competing-win-coalition-approach-countering-bri.
no DOI — not checkedPassi, R. 2019. Unpacking economic motivations and non-economic consequences of connectivity infrastructure under OBOR. In L. Xing (Ed.), Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative. International Political Economy Series Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
no DOI — not checkedPei, M. 2020. China’s coming upheaval: Competition, the coronavirus, and the weakness of Xi Jinping. Foreign Affairs, 99(3): 82–95.
no DOI — not checkedRisberg, P. 2019. The give-and-take of BRI in African. New perspectives in Foreign Policy. 17 (April 8, 2019). https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/NewPerspectives_APRIL2019_Risberg.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedRuta, M., Dappe, M. H., Lall, S., Zhang, C., Constantinescu, C., Lebrand, M., Mulabdic, A., & Churchill, E. 2019. Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and risks of transport corridors. Herndon: World Bank Publications.
no DOI — not checkedVangeli, A. 2019. A framework for the study of One Belt One Road initiative as a medium of principle diffusion. In L. Xing (Ed.), Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
no DOI — not checkedWei, H., Sheng, Z., & Lee, P. 2017. The role of dry port in Hub-and-Spoke network under Bet and Road Initiative. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3): 1–18.
no DOI — not checkedWuthnow, J. 2017. Chinese perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic rationale, risks and implications. National Defense University Press.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.