Reference health
Regrowth Potential of Bacteria after Ultraviolet Disinfection in the Absence of Light and Dark Repair
ee.1943-7870.0000905/badge.svg){kind=icon}
17/17 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.015
Standardizing photoreactivation: Comparison of DNA photorepair rate in Escherichia coli using four different fluorescent lamps
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:3(209)
Standardization of Methods for Fluence (UV Dose) Determination in Bench-Scale UV Experiments
resolves10.2166/wst.2011.272
Disinfection of greywater effluent and regrowth potential of selected bacteria
resolves10.1016/0043-1354(87)90080-7
Ultraviolet inactivation of selected bacteria and viruses with photoreactivation of the bacteria
resolves10.2166/ws.2005.0044
Repair and regrowth of Escherichia coli after low- and medium-pressure ultraviolet disinfection
resolves10.2166/wst.2004.0393
Re-use of wastewater: preventing the recovery of pathogens by using medium-pressure UV lamp technology
resolves10.1016/0273-1223(96)00428-3
Assessment of photoreactivation following ultraviolet light disinfection
resolves10.2307/3565378
Decomposition of Lake Phytoplankton. 2. Composition and Lability of Lysis Products
resolves10.1016/0043-1354(94)90087-6
Ultraviolet disinfection of wastewater: Effect of dose on subsequent photoreactivation
resolves10.2166/ws.2002.0212
Comparison of disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation from different UV technologies at bench scale
resolves10.1128/AEM.67.10.4630-4637.2001
Determination of Pyrimidine Dimers in
<i>Escherichia coli</i>
and
<i>Cryptosporidium parvum</i>
during UV Light Inactivation, Photoreactivation, and Dark Repair
resolves10.4315/0362-028X-63.8.1015
UV Inactivation, Liquid-Holding Recovery, and Photoreactivation of Escherichia coli O157 and Other Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in Water
resolves10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03652.x
Are UV‐induced nonculturable <i>Escherichia coli</i> K‐12 cells alive or dead?
resolves10.1128/AEM.68.7.3293-3299.2002
Potential Repair of
<i>Escherichia coli</i>
DNA following Exposure to UV Radiation from Both Medium- and Low-Pressure UV Sources Used in Drinking Water Treatment
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Public Health Association (APHA) American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater Washington DC.
no DOI — not checkedGerman Gas and Water Management Union (DVGW). (2006). UV disinfection devices for drinking water supply requirements and testing DVGW W294-1 -2 and -3 Bonn Germany.
no DOI — not checkedGrowth and repair potential of three species of bacteria in reclaimed wastewater after UV disinfection
no DOI — not checkedIJpelaar G. F. and Beerendonk E. F. (2001). “Formation of by-products by UV disinfection—Comparison of various UV beamers on laboratory scale.” Kiwa Rep. BTO 2001.193 (in Dutch).
no DOI — not checkedInactivation of pathogens with innovative UV technologies
no DOI — not checkedOsterreichisches Normungsinstitut (ÖNORM). (2001). “Plants for the disinfection of water using ultraviolet radiation requirements and testing—Part 1: Low pressure mercury lamp plants.” ÖNORM M 5873-1 Vienna Austria.
no DOI — not checkedVan der Maas P. Van der Woerdt D. Wübbels G. and Van der Kooij D. (2010). “Impact of low pressure UV on the regrowth potential of drinking water.” Proc. 2010 IWA World Water Congress IWA Publishing London.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000905"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000905/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[ee.1943-7870.0000905/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000905)