Reference health
Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses
54/54 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 54 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s00267-012-9888-4
Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Development in Five Tropical Forest Landscapes
resolves10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00575.x
Reconciling Conservation and Development: Are Landscapes the Answer?
resolves10.1023/A:1015633830223
Creating a Science of Nature Reserve Design: Perspectives from History
resolves10.1016/0006-3207(75)90052-X
The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00570.x
When Agendas Collide: Human Welfare and Biological Conservation
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.038
Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being
resolves10.5751/ES-01943-120103
Facilitating Cooperation During Times Of Chaos: Spontaneous Orders And Muddling Through In Malinau District, Indonesia
resolves10.1007/s10531-006-9079-9
Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes
resolves10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.002
Landscape-scale research for conservation and development in the tropics: fighting persisting challenges
resolves10.1007/s10021-011-9466-2
The Ecosystem in Practice: Interest and Problems of an Old Definition for Constructing Ecological Models
resolves10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0313:TCLAAM]2.3.CO;2
The Cultural Landscape as a Model for the Integration of Ecology and Economics
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x
A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2007.07.009
Integrated assessment of agricultural systems – A component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS)
resolves10.1007/s00267-011-9689-1
Understanding and Integrating Local Perceptions of Trees and Forests into Incentives for Sustainable Landscape Management
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.013
Adaptive management on the central Platte River – Science, engineering, and decision analysis to assist in the recovery of four species
resolves10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.11.001
Building participatory landscape-based conservation alternatives: A case study of Michoacán, Mexico
resolves10.1080/00358533.2012.661531
Forest Governance in a Changing World: Reconciling Local and Global Values
resolves10.1177/194008291000300303
A Framework for Assessing Conservation and Development in a Congo Basin Forest Landscape
resolves10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0565
Should Enhanced Resilience Be an Objective of Natural Resource Management Research for Developing Countries?
resolves10.1007/s00267-011-9636-1
Elephants Also Like Coffee: Trends and Drivers of Human–Elephant Conflicts in Coffee Agroforestry Landscapes of Kodagu, Western Ghats, India
resolves10.1126/science.1208742
Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared
resolves10.1017/S0376892908004438
Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: a time to face the trade-offs?
resolves10.1080/01636600802535606
Global Democracy Promotion: Seven Lessons for the New Administration
resolves10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.007
Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-70721-1_10
Linking the Community Options Analysis and Investment Toolkit (COAIT), Consensys® and Payment for Environmental Services (PES): A Model to Promote Sustainability in African Gorilla Conservation
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review
resolves10.1177/109821400202300104
Unequal Power—Changing Landscapes: Negotiations between Evaluation Stakeholders in Latino Communities
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked; United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Harvesting Agriculture’s Multiple Benefits: Mitigation, Adaptation, Development and Food Security: Policy Brief (FAO, Rome, 2009).
no DOI — not checkedJA Sayer, B Campbell The Science of Sustainable Development: Local Livelihoods and the Global Environment (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005).
no DOI — not checked; Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Current Status and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, DC, 2005).
no DOI — not checked; Foresight Program The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability (Government Office for Science, London, 2011).
no DOI — not checkedJA Sayer S Maginnis M Laurie Forests in landscapes: Ecosystem approaches to sustainability. (Earthscan London 2005).
no DOI — not checkedD Salt, D Lindenmayer The Bowral Checklist. A Framework for Ecological Management of Landscapes. (Land and Water Australia, Canberra, 2008).
no DOI — not checkedDN Laven, NJ Mitchell, D Wang, Conservation practice at the landscape scale. George Wright Forum 22, 5–9 (2005).
no DOI — not checked; United Nations Environment Programme Report on How to Improve Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in a Landscape Perspective: Executive Summary (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/13). United Nations Environment Programme Subsidiary Body on Scientific Technical and Technological Advice 15th Meeting Montreal Canada November 7–11 2011. Available at http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-15/official/sbstta-15-13-en.pdf Accessed May 16 2012. (2011).
no DOI — not checkedKA Kohm, JF Franklin Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1997).
no DOI — not checked; Forest Stewardship Council Principles and Criteria for Forest Management (Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn, Germany, 1996).
no DOI — not checkedJA Sayer C Elliot S Maginnis Protect manage and restore; Conserving forests in multi-functional landscapes. Proceedings 2003 World Forestry Congress Synthesis. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome Italy Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0484-C3.HTM. Accessed January 18 2013. (2003).
no DOI — not checkedH Korn, K Bockmühl, R Schliep Report of the European expert meeting in preparation of SBSTTA-15, 26-28 September, 2011 (Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany, 2011).
no DOI — not checkedCJP Colfer, et al., Participatory action research for catalyzing adaptive management: Analysis of a ‘fits and starts’ process. J Environ Sci Eng 5, 28–43 (2011).
no DOI — not checkedKL Lee Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1993).
no DOI — not checkedG Accascina, Information technology and poverty alleviation. The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Rural Development and Food Security (FAO, Rome, 2000).
no DOI — not checked; International Union for Conservation of Nature Learning from Landscapes, Arbor Vitae Special Issue (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland). (2008).
no DOI — not checkeded F Jesus P.A.C.T. A Pro-Active Conciliation Tool Analysing Stakeholders’ Inter-Relations CGPRT Publication (ESCAP) no. 41. (Coarse Grains Pulses Roots and Tubers Centre Bogor Indonesia). Available at http://www.uncapsa.org/publication/cg41.pdf. (2001).
no DOI — not checkedL Wollenberg Participatory Mapping. Report of Workshop “Building an Agenda Together” and Mapping Training. Available at www.cifor.org/acm/methods/pm.html. Accessed May 16 2012. (1999).
no DOI — not checkedP Selman, Planning for landscape multifunctionality. Community Essay 5, Available at http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol5iss2/communityessay.pselman.html. Accessed May 16, 2012. (2009).
no DOI — not checkedEBM Tools Network Social Science Working Group. How Can Social Science-Based Software Tools Assist in the Ecosystem-Based Management Process? Available at www.ebmtools.org/sites/natureserve/files/SSWG%20Tools%20Survey_1.pdf. Accessed May 16 2012.
no DOI — not checkedGD Peterson, Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conserv Ecol 6, 17 (2002).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1073/pnas.1210595110"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1073/pnas.1210595110/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1073/pnas.1210595110)