Reference health

On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project

https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684
CiteStamped reference-health badge
44/44 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-02

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 44 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/17449480902896346
Fair Value Accounting and the Banking Crisis in 2008: Shooting the Messenger
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2004.04.001
Disciplining domestic regulation: the World Trade Organization and the market for professional services
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2012.05.001
The political economy of financial harmonization: The East Asian financial crisis and the rise of international accounting standards
resolves10.1016/j.cpa.2011.04.001
Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting—The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis
resolves10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes
resolves10.4337/9781781001066
The Politics of Accounting Regulation
resolves10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1301
Transnational standard setting in accounting
resolves10.1177/0170840612443626
Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards
resolves10.1080/09638180.2012.718487
Intended and Unintended Consequences of Mandatory IFRS Adoption: A Review of Extant Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research
resolves10.1515/9781400838790
The New Global Rulers
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296293.001.0001
Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets
resolves10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.002
An unprecedented privatisation of mandatory standard-setting: The case of European accounting policy
resolves10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.004
The rise and rise of IFRS: An examination of IFRS diffusion
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.003
Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization
resolves10.1080/17449480.2012.664396
The Legitimacy of the IASB
resolves10.1057/9780230590144
The New Transnationalism
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2014.11.001
“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting
resolves10.1080/09638180.2010.496548
The Decision Usefulness of Financial Accounting Measurement Concepts: Evidence from an Online Survey of Professional Investors and their Advisors
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6281.2004.00152.x
Corporate Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Methods, Timing and Perceived Effectiveness
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.003
The IASB standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users
resolves10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on Share-Based Payments
resolves10.1093/ser/mwp024
Rhetorical legitimation: global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations 
resolves10.1080/09638189400000020
Some reflections on ‘The harmonization of accounting within the EU’
resolves10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00299.x
Agenda formation and accounting standards setting: lessons from the standards setters
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.003
The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: Understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis
resolves10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
Formal Participation in the IASB's Due Process of Standard Setting: A Multi-issue/Multi-period Analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.04.005
A geographic analysis of constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: Do we have a level playing field?
resolves10.2308/acch-50423
Potential Adoption of IFRS by the United States: A Critical View
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
Practices of standard-setting – An analysis of the IASB's and FASB's process of identifying the objective of financial reporting
resolves10.1080/00014788.2011.575002
The European IFRS experiment: objectives, research challenges and some early evidence
resolves10.1093/ser/mwp029
Law, expertise and legitimacy in transnational economic governance: an introduction
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2008.12.001
Making imaginary worlds real: The case of expensing employee stock options
resolves10.1007/s10551-007-9540-z
Due Process and Standard-setting: An Analysis of Due Process in Three Canadian Accounting and Auditing Standard-setting Bodies
resolves10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
Legitimating Transnational Standard-Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001
Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?
resolves10.1017/S1049096505050134
Legitimacy Crisis: Again?
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(84)90031-X
Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A Downsian analysis
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(94)90013-2
Outlining regulatory space: Agenda issues and the FASB
resolves10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00016-8
Constructing, persuading and silencing: the rhetoric of accounting standards
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
Making up users
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12046
Separating the Political and Technical: Accounting Standard‐Setting and Purification
resolves10.2308/accr-10244
Book Reviews
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01388.x
The View of Old and New Powers on the Legitimacy of International Institutions
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCIT0006
no DOI — not checkedThe FASB Conceptual Framework Project 1973–1985
no DOI — not checkedCapitalism, Culture, and Economic Re-gulation
no DOI — not checkedCIT0068
no DOI — not checkedInternational Accounting – Standards, Regulations, and Financial Reporting
no DOI — not checkedCrisis and Control
no DOI — not checkedRegieren jenseits des Nationalstaates
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684)