Reference health
Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries
51/51 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 51 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/0265407592091002
Intimacy, Passion and Commitment in Adult Romantic Relationships: A Test of the Triangular Theory of Love
resolves10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3
Passion, Intimacy, and Time: Passionate Love as a Function of Change in Intimacy
resolves10.1089/cyber.2014.0469
The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships
resolves10.1080/10705510701301834
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
resolves10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
resolves10.2466/PR0.67.5.219-224
RELIABILITY AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE STERNBERG TRIANGULAR LOVE SCALE
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.06.003
Assortative mating and the evolution of desirability covariation
resolves10.1177/106939719903300303
Sexual Equality and Romantic Love: A Reanalysis of Rosenblatt’s Study on the Function of Romantic Love
resolves10.1177/1069397110393313
Cross-Cultural Analysis of Models of Romantic Love Among U.S. Residents, Russians, and Lithuanians
resolves10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01168.x
Individualistic and Collectivistic Perspectives on Gender and the Cultural Context of Love and Intimacy
resolves10.1023/A:1019888024255
Defining the Brain Systems of Lust, Romantic Attraction, and Attachment
resolves10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00007-4
Intimacy, passion, and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004
Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States
resolves10.1080/10705519909540118
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
resolves10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.941
Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment among Married Individuals: Further Testing of the Triangular Theory of Love
resolves10.1177/0265407588054004
Lovestyles and Attachment Styles Compared: Their Relations to Each Other and to Various Relationship Characteristics
resolves10.1177/0265407507086810
Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism—collectivism
resolves10.1177/1069397118813306
Core and Peripheral Features of the Cross-Cultural Model of Romantic Love
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments.
resolves10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.12.002
Brief report: Intimacy, passion, and commitment in romantic relationships—Validation of a ‘triangular love scale’ for adolescents<sup>☆</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.038
Is love related to selfies? Romantic selfie posting behavior and love levels among women and men
resolves10.1163/156913306778667357
A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications
resolves10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01199
Marital Satisfaction, Sex, Age, Marriage Duration, Religion, Number of Children, Economic Status, Education, and Collectivistic Values: Data from 33 Countries
resolves10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00459.x
Passionate and Companionate Love in Courting and Young Married Couples
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199705)27:3<313::AID-EJSP824>3.0.CO;2-4
Construct validation of a triangular love scale
resolves10.1177/0956797620904154
Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication
resolves10.1007/s40750-014-0007-z
Early Stage Romantic Love is Associated with Reduced Daily Cortisol Production
resolves10.1177/0265407593103013
Reliability and Aspects of the Construct Validity of Sternberg's Triangular Love Scale
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBuss, D. M. (2006). The evolution of love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Sternberg (Eds.), The new psychology of love (2nd ed., pp. 280–299). Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCassepp-Borges, V., & Martins Teodoro, M. L. (2009). Versión reducida de la escala triangular del amor: Características del sentimiento en Brasil. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 30–38. http://www.https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28411918004
no DOI — not checkedDiamond, L. M., & Dickenson, J. A. (2012). The neuroimaging of love and desire: Review and future directions. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9(1), 39–46. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Janna_Dickenson/publication/229424231_The_neuroimaging_of_love_and_desire_Review_and_future_directions/links/0912f5009c0c0011e2000000/The-neuroimaging-of-love-and-desire-Review-and-future-directions.pdf
no DOI — not checkedFeybesse, C., & Hatfield, E. (2019). Passionate love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Sternberg (Eds.), The new psychology of love (2nd ed., pp. 183–207). Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedFisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. Henry Holt.
no DOI — not checkedHancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 195–216). Scientific Software International.
no DOI — not checkedHatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Allyn & Bacon.
no DOI — not checkedHatfield, E., & Walster, G. W. (1985). A new look at love. University Press of America.
no DOI — not checkedHazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. American Psychologist, 46(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
no DOI — not checkedHendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (2019). Styles of romantic love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Sternberg (Eds.), The new psychology of love (2nd ed., pp. 223–239). Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedHofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
no DOI — not checkedJankowiak, W. (Ed.). (1995). Romantic passion: A universal experience? Columbia University Press.
no DOI — not checkedKline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
no DOI — not checkedLee, J. A. (1973). Colours of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. New Press.
no DOI — not checkedMikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2019). A behavioral systems approach to romantic love relationshispw: Attachment, caregiving, and sex. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Sternberg (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 259–279). Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedNg, T. K., & Cheng, C. H. K. (2010). The effects of intimacy, passion, and commitment on satisfaction in romantic relationships among Hong Kong Chinese people. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11(2), 123–146.
no DOI — not checkedSternberg, R. J. (1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. Basic Books (AZ).
no DOI — not checkedSternberg, R. J. (2006). A duplex theory of love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 184–199). Yale University Press.
no DOI — not checkedSternberg, R. J. (2019). When love goes awry (Part 1): Applications of the duplex theory of love and its development to relationships gone bad. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Sternberg (Eds.), The new psychology of love (2nd ed., pp. 280–299). Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedSternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (Eds.). (2019). The new psychology of love (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedWojciszke, B. (2002). From the first sight to the last drop: A six stage model of the dynamics of love. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 33, 15–26.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318)