Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
BIOGEOGRAPHY AND TAXONOMY OF <i>BATRACHOSPERMUM HELMINTHOSUM</i> (BATRACHOSPERMALES, RHODOPHYTA) IN JAPAN INFERRED FROM <i>RBC</i>L GENE SEQUENCES<sup>1</sup>
Reproductive morphology and <scp>DNA</scp> sequences of the brown alga <i>Platysiphon verticillatus</i> support the new combination <i>Platysiphon glacialis</i>
Proposal of a new brown algal species, <i>Mesogloia japonica sp. nov</i>. (Chordariaceae, Phaeophyceae), and transfer of <i>Sauvageaugloia ikomae</i> to <i>Mesogloia</i>
Taxonomic re‐examination of <scp>J</scp>apanese <i><scp>H</scp>alimeda</i> species using genetic markers, and proposal of a new species <i><scp>H</scp>alimeda ryukyuensis</i> (<scp>B</scp>ryopsidales, <scp>C</scp>hlorophyta)
A multi-locus time-calibrated phylogeny of the brown algae (Heterokonta, Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae): Investigating the evolutionary nature of the “brown algal crown radiation”
Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data
Chloroplast genome of one brown seaweed, Saccharina japonica (Laminariales, Phaeophyta): Its structural features and phylogenetic analyses with other photosynthetic plastids
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCIT0001
no DOI — not checkedArasaki, S. (1964). How to know the seaweeds of Japan and its vicinity fully illustrated in colours. Hokuryukan, Tokyo. 217 pp. (In Japanese)
no DOI — not checkedCIT0003
no DOI — not checkedCIT0008
no DOI — not checkedCIT0025
no DOI — not checkedCIT0026
no DOI — not checkedCIT0028
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.