1 of 27 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-14
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a publisher retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/hequ.2005.59.issue-1
Recasting the academic workforce: why the attractiveness of the academic profession needs to be increased and eight possible strategies for how to go about this from an Australian perspective
Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAustin, A.E. & Wulff, D.H. (2004).The challenge to prepare the next generation of faculty Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty(pp. 3–16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
no DOI — not checkedAustralian innovation system report 2014
no DOI — not checkedWaiting in the wings: A study of early career academic researchers in Australia commissioned report no 50
no DOI — not checkedHow to research
no DOI — not checkedThe attractiveness of the Australian academic profession: A comparative analysis
no DOI — not checkedThe real academic revolution: Why we need to reconceptualise Australia’s future academic workforce, and eight possible strategies for how to go about this
no DOI — not checkedWhen research works for women
no DOI — not checkedHow to design and evaluate research in education
no DOI — not checkedHodge, A., Bownes, M., Burgess, R., Chambaz, J., Dodson, E., Johnes, G. & Ritchie, E. (2011).Review of progress in implementing the recommendations of Sir Gareth Roberts, regarding employability and career development of PhD students and research staff. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/skills/IndependentReviewHodge.pdf
no DOI — not checkedInvestigating the ageing academic workforce: Stocktake
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation of research performance: A review of selected input and output characteristics
no DOI — not checkedRoberts, G.G. (2002).SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills: The report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ review. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/robertsreview_introch1.pdf
no DOI — not checkedLearning leaders in times of change: Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.