Reference health

Evaluation of mechanical performance of cement–bitumen-treated materials through laboratory and <i>in-situ</i> testing

https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1213506
CiteStamped reference-health badge
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/10298436.2012.657196
Full-depth reclamation for the rehabilitation of local roads: a case study
resolves10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.007
A study on the mechanical behaviour of cement–bitumen treated materials
resolves10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.723.1044
Runway Pavement Reconstruction with Full Material Recycling: The Case of the Airport of Treviso
resolves10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_70
The Effect of Curing on the Mechanical Behavior of Cement-Bitumen Treated Materials
resolves10.1080/14680629.2012.742624
Compactability and thermal sensitivity of cement–bitumen-treated materials
resolves10.1617/s11527-016-0792-x
Volumetric properties and influence of water content on the compactability of cold recycled mixtures
resolves10.1080/10298430601149718
Foamed bitumen mixes = shear performance?
resolves10.1201/b16730-61
Calibration of fatigue and rutting distress models for non conventional asphalt concrete materials
resolves10.1080/14680629.2013.774752
Performance evaluation of a cold-recycled mixture containing high percentage of reclaimed asphalt
resolves10.1080/14680629.2013.866707
Synthesis of standards and procedures for specimen preparation and in-field evaluation of cold-recycled asphalt mixtures
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAcademy, A. (2009). Technical guideline: Bitumen Stabilized Materials. Technical guide TG2 (2nd ed.). South Africa: Pretoria.
no DOI — not checkedAzienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade (ANAS). (2010). Capitolato Speciale di Appalto. Parte 2a Norme tecniche Pavimentazioni stradali e autostradali Italy.
no DOI — not checkedBocci, M., Canestrari, F., Grilli, A., Pasquini, E., & Lioi, D. (2010). Recycling techniques and environmental issues relating to the widening of an high traffic volume Italian motorway. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3(4), 171–177.
no DOI — not checkedFederal Aviation Administration FAA. (2012a). BAKFAA tools v. 2. Washington DC. Retrieved March 15 2015 from http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/design_software/
no DOI — not checkedFederal Aviation Administration FAA. (2012b). Use of nondestructive testing in the evaluation of airport pavements (150/5370-11B). Washington DC.
no DOI — not checkedKearney, E. (1997). Cold mix recycling: State-of-the-practice. International Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 66, 760–784.
no DOI — not checkedLa Torre F. (2014). Collegamento autostradale Dalmine-Como-Varese-Valico del Gaggiolo e opera ad esso connesse- Tratt B1 B2 C TRVA13+14 Greenway – Perizia di Variante – Capitolato speciale d’appalto – Norme Tecniche – Pavimentazioni integrazioni.
no DOI — not checkedLiebenberg, J. J. E., & Visser, A. T. (2004). Towards a mechanistic structural design procedure for emulsion treated base layer. Journal of South Africa Institution of Civil Engineers, 46, 2–8.
no DOI — not checkedLoizos, A. (2007). In-situ characterization of foamed bitumen treated layer mixes for heavy duty pavements. International Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design, 8(2), 123–135.
no DOI — not checkedLoizos A. Collings D. & Jenkins K. (2004). Rehabilitation of a major Greek highway by recycling/stabilising with foamed bitumen 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA’04) Sun City South Africa 12–16 September.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2016.1213506"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2016.1213506/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2016.1213506/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2016.1213506)