Reference health

Comparative mechanistic-empirical analysis for design of alternative cold recycled asphalt technologies with conventional pavement

https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1338187
CiteStamped reference-health badge
not checkable · checked 2026-07-23

This work could not be checked — none of the deposited references carry a DOI. No claim is made either way about its reference list.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked“Technical guideline: Bitumen stabilised materials”, A guide for the design and construction of bitumen emulsion and foamed bitumen stabilised materials, TG 2
no DOI — not checkedThickness design manual (MS-1)
no DOI — not checkedChen, D. H., Zaman, M., Laguros, J. & Soltani, A. (1995). Assessment of computer programs for analysis of flexible pavement structure (pp. 123–133). Transportation Research Record 1482. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
no DOI — not checkedDuncan, J. M., Monismith, C. L. & Wilson, E. L. (1968). Finite element analyses of pavements (pp. 18–33). Highway Research Record 228. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.
no DOI — not checkedUser guidelines for waste and by-product materials in pavement construction
no DOI — not checkedAircraft pavement/technology – In the midst of change
no DOI — not checkedCIT0015
no DOI — not checkedShell pavement design manual
no DOI — not checkedCold recycling – Wirtgen cold recycling technology
no DOI — not checkedZaghloul, S. & White, T. (1992). Use of three-dimensional dynamic finite element program for analysis of flexible pavement (pp. 60–69). Transportation Research Record, No.1388. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2017.1338187"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2017.1338187/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2017.1338187/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/14680629.2017.1338187)