Reference health
Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration
73/73 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
41 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 73 checked references that resolve
resolves10.21606/drs.2020.282
Human-centered AI: The role of Human-centered Design Research in the development of AI
resolves10.1145/3461702.3462571
Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
resolves10.1111/epi.17570
Are <scp>AI</scp> language models such as <scp>ChatGPT</scp> ready to improve the care of individuals with epilepsy?
resolves10.1177/2053951715622512
How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
resolves10.1080/00913367.2021.1909515
Preparing for an Era of Deepfakes and AI-Generated Ads: A Framework for Understanding Responses to Manipulated Advertising
resolves10.17705/1thci.00138
Exploring the Intersection of the Digital Divide and Artificial Intelligence: A Hermeneutic Literature Review
resolves10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4
Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios
resolves10.1515/ijld-2023-2001
From principles to practices: the intertextual interaction between AI ethical and legal discourses
resolves10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
resolves10.1002/job.2695
Awe‐inspiring advancements in AI: The impact of ChatGPT on the field of Organizational Behavior
resolves10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
resolves10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10635
Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.25300/MISQ/2021/16553
Will Humans-in-the-Loop Become Borgs? Merits and Pitfalls of Working with AI
resolves10.1109/JAS.2023.123555
Can ChatGPT Boost Artistic Creation: The Need of Imaginative Intelligence for Parallel Art
resolves10.4018/JDM.2019040104
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Autonomous Technologies in Mining Industry
resolves10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence
resolves10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553
Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry
resolves10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models
resolves10.1145/3491102.3501825
Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
resolves10.1109/TCIAIG.2016.2642158
Creating AI Characters for Fighting Games Using Genetic Programming
resolves10.1007/978-3-030-16667-0_3
Autonomy, Authenticity, Authorship and Intention in Computer Generated Art
resolves10.1177/00081256221094307
“Digital Colonization” of Highly Regulated Industries: An Analysis of Big Tech Platforms’ Entry into Health Care and Education
resolves10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905015
Recent Progress on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): A Survey
resolves10.1177/10776958221149577
Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education
resolves10.1108/JICES-06-2021-0059
Toward accountable human-centered AI: rationale and promising directions
resolves10.1145/3527927.3532792
Initial Images: Using Image Prompts to Improve Subject Representation in Multimodal AI Generated Art
resolves10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
resolves10.3390/healthcare11060887
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
resolves10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide
resolves10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy
resolves10.1145/3490099.3511119
Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design
resolves10.1287/isre.2023.ed.v34.n2
The Janus Effect of Generative AI: Charting the Path for Responsible Conduct of Scholarly Activities in Information Systems
resolves10.1609/aaai.v36i3.20154
One-Shot Talking Face Generation from Single-Speaker Audio-Visual Correlation Learning
resolves10.4018/JDM.2019010104
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Automation, Robotics, Future of Work and Future of Humanity
resolves10.1007/978-3-031-21707-4_40
Legal and Regulatory Issues on Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Data Science, and Big Data
resolves10.1145/365153.365168
ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
resolves10.1109/MITP.2020.2985492
“All Around Me Are Synthetic Faces”: The Mad World of AI-Generated Media
resolves10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900
Transitioning to Human Interaction with AI Systems: New Challenges and Opportunities for HCI Professionals to Enable Human-Centered AI
resolves10.2139/ssrn.4350925
Economics of ChatGPT: A Labor Market View on the Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.17705/1thci.00149
Intelligence Augmentation: Towards Building Human- machine Symbiotic Relationship
resolves10.17705/1thci.00085
From Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Intelligence Augmentation (IA): Design Principles, Potential Risks, and Emerging Issues
The 41 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedcit0001
no DOI — not checkedcit0005
no DOI — not checkedcit0009
no DOI — not checkedcit0010
no DOI — not checkedBrundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., Khlaaf, H., Yang, J., Toner, H., Fong, R., Maharaj, T., Koh, P., Hooker, S., Leung, J., Trask, A., Bluemke, E., Lebensold, J., O'Keefe, C., Koren, M. … Anderljung, M. (2020). Toward trustworthy AI development: Mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.07213
no DOI — not checkedBullock, J. & Luengo-Oroz, M. (2019). Automated speech generation from UN general assembly statements: Mapping risks in AI generated texts. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.01946
no DOI — not checkedcit0017
no DOI — not checkedChui, M., Roberts, R. & Yee, L. (2022, December 20). Generative AI is Here: How Tools Like ChatGpt Could Change Your Business. Quantum Black AI by McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/generative-ai-is-here-how-tools-like-chatgpt-could-change-your-business#/
no DOI — not checkedcit0024
no DOI — not checkedFieser, J. (n.d.). Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 17, 2023, from https://web.archive.org/web/20180119084940/http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics
no DOI — not checkedcit0029
no DOI — not checkedcit0030
no DOI — not checkedcit0033
no DOI — not checkedGonzalez, W. (2023, April 25). How businesses can help reduce bias in AI. Forbes. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/04/25/how-businesses-can-help-reduce-bias-in-ai/.
no DOI — not checkedGozalo-Brizuela, R. & Garrido-Merchan, E. C. (2023). ChatGPT is not all you need. A state of the art review of large generative AI models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04655
no DOI — not checkedcit0042
no DOI — not checkedcit0044
no DOI — not checkedKroll, J. A. (2015). Accountable Algorithms (Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University).
no DOI — not checkedLuo, G., Zhou, Y., Ren, T., Chen, S., Sun, X. & Ji, R. (2023). Cheap and quick: Efficient vision-language instruction tuning for large language models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.15023
no DOI — not checkedExperiences in visual thinking
no DOI — not checkedHuman-in-the-loop machine learning
no DOI — not checkedcit0060
no DOI — not checkedProceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing
no DOI — not checkedPorter, J. (2023, March 21). ChatGpt Bug Temporarily Exposes AI Chat Histories to Other Users. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/21/23649806/chatgpt-chat-histories-bug-exposed-disabled-outage
no DOI — not checkedcit0072
no DOI — not checkedcit0073
no DOI — not checkedProceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
no DOI — not checkedcit0081
no DOI — not checkedcit0082
no DOI — not checkedParallel distributed processing
no DOI — not checkedStancati, M. & Schechner, S. (2023, March 31). ChatGPT banned in Italy over data-privacy concerns. The Wall Street Journal. Available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-banned-in-italy-over-data-privacy-concerns-4b984e75.
no DOI — not checkedSusnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
no DOI — not checkedcit0089
no DOI — not checkedTurnitin. (n.d.) Turnitin’s AI Writing Detection Capabilities. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://www.turnitin.com/products/features/ai-writing-detection
no DOI — not checkedUniversity of Cambridge. (n.d.). Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct. Retrieved April 10, 2023 at https://www.plagiarism.admin.cam.ac.uk/what-academic-misconduct/artificial-intelligence
no DOI — not checkedUniversity of Oxford. (2023, January 30). Four Lessons from ChatGpt: Challenges and Opportunities for Educators. https://www.ctl.ox.ac.uk/article/four-lessons-from-chatgpt-challenges-and-opportunities-for-educators#Lesson3
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Copyright Office. (n.d.). What is Copyright? Retrieved May 17, 2023, from https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/
no DOI — not checkedcit0099
no DOI — not checkedWeidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P. S. &Gabriel, I. (2021). Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04359
no DOI — not checkedWoolf, M. (2022, December 8). ChatGPT passes the turing test. Metaverse Post. https://mpost.io/chatgpt-passes-the-turing-test/
no DOI — not checkedZhuo, T. Y., Huang, Y., Chen, C. & Xing, Z. (2023). Exploring AI ethics of ChatGPT: A diagnostic analysis. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.12867
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814)