Reference health
Inside the Black Box of IASB Standard Setting: Evidence from Board Meeting Audio Playbacks on the Amendment of IAS 19 (2011)
75/75 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.05.003
Towards an understanding of the role of standard setters in standard setting
resolves10.1177/0021943609340669
Cognitive Organization and Identity Maintenance in Multicultural Teams: A Discourse Analysis of Decision-Making Meetings
resolves10.1016/j.cpa.2011.04.001
Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting—The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis
resolves10.1177/014920639101700205
Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed
resolves10.1080/17449626.2013.773180
Global multi-stakeholder standard setters: how fragile are they?
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.001
(No) Limits to Anglo-American accounting? Reconstructing the history of the International Accounting Standards Committee: A review article
resolves10.1002/nml.12409
Reframing Board‐Staff Relations: Exploring the Governance Function Using a Storytelling Metaphor
resolves10.1177/089976409202100304
Do Nonprofit Boards Make a Difference? An Exploration of the Relationships Among Board Structure, Process, and Effectiveness
resolves10.1016/j.racreg.2010.07.003
Investigating international accounting standard setting: The black box of IFRS 6
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2008.11.003
Powerful players: How constituents captured the setting of IFRS 6, an accounting standard for the extractive industries
resolves10.1080/10438599000000002
The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1108/JAOC-10-2013-0081
Corporate environmental sustainability disclosures and environmental risk
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2014.11.001
“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting
resolves10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2008.07.005
Adoption of IAS 19R by Europe's premier listed companies: Corridor approach versus full recognition
resolves10.1016/0278-4254(87)90004-4
Lobbying against proposed accounting standards: The case of employers' pension accounting
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6281.2004.00152.x
Corporate Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Methods, Timing and Perceived Effectiveness
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.003
The IASB standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users
resolves10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on Share-Based Payments
resolves10.1177/0312896213510713
The politics of accounting standard-setting: A review of empirical research
resolves10.1080/00014788.2017.1354760
Discretionary accounting choices: the case of IAS 19 pension accounting
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(80)90027-6
The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process
resolves10.1108/S1085-4622(2012)0000013022
Teaching IFRS with Online Videos and Webcasts: Resources, Analysis and Guidance
resolves10.2308/jiar-51825
The Phoenix Rises: The Australian Accounting Standards Board and IFRS Adoption
resolves10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
Formal Participation in the IASB's Due Process of Standard Setting: A Multi-issue/Multi-period Analysis
resolves10.1007/978-1-4614-8097-6_5
Constituents’ Participation in the IASC/IASB’s due Process of International Accounting Standard Setting: A Longitudinal Analysis
resolves10.2308/0148-4184.39.1.1
THE EVOLUTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE US FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD AND THE INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD SETTERS: 1973–2008
resolves10.1080/17449480.2014.897459
Determinants of Corporate Participation in the IFRS 4 (Insurance Contracts) Replacement Process
resolves10.1080/17449480.2013.772716
A Multi-Issue/Multi-Period Analysis of the Geographic Diversity of IASB Comment Letter Participation
resolves10.1177/001872679404700504
Understanding Our Differences: Performance in Decision-Making Groups with Diverse Members
resolves10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00028-8
Constituent lobbying and its impact on the development of financial reporting regulations: evidence from Germany
resolves10.1006/obhd.2000.2943
Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes
resolves10.1177/0148558X9300800308
Corporate Lobbying Strategy and Pension Accounting Deliberations: An Empirical Analysis
resolves10.1080/17449480.2011.621672
Corporate Lobbying in Private Accounting Standard Setting: Does the IASB have to Reckon with National Differences?
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
Practices of standard-setting – An analysis of the IASB's and FASB's process of identifying the objective of financial reporting
resolves10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684
On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project
resolves10.1017/S0022109000002313
Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards
resolves10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
Legitimating Transnational Standard-Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board
resolves10.1177/0148558X9501000308
The Accounting Standard-Setting Due Process, Corporate Consensus, and FASB Responsiveness: Employers' Accounting for Pensions
resolves10.1111/1467-6281.00032
An Examination of Comment Letters Filed in the U.S. Financial Accounting Standard‐Setting Process by Institutional Interest Groups
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006
Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups
resolves10.1007/BF03396651
On the Legitimacy of Accounting Standard Setting by Privately Organised Institutions in Germany and Europe
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion.
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(84)90031-X
Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A Downsian analysis
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6281.1994.tb00346.x
Competing Regulatory Agencies With Conflicting Agendas: Setting Standards For Cash Flow Reporting In Australia
resolves10.1016/0147-1767(92)90005-F
Differences in decision making regarding risk taking: A comparison of culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous task groups
resolves10.1177/031289627700200104
Corporate Financial Statements, A Product of the Market and Political Processes
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12046
Separating the Political and Technical: Accounting Standard‐Setting and Purification
resolves10.2308/acch.2002.16.1.43
“Political” Lobbying on Proposed Standards: A Challenge to the IASB
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedInteraction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups
no DOI — not checkedWorking papers in the theory of action
no DOI — not checkedThe handbook of group research and practice
no DOI — not checkedContent analysis in communication research
no DOI — not checkedGroup performance
no DOI — not checkedAn economic theory of democracy
no DOI — not checkedSmall group decision making: Communication and the group process
no DOI — not checkedAn introduction to qualitative research
no DOI — not checkedIFRS for European small and medium-sized entities? A theoretical and empirical analysis
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of small group research
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding international accounting standard setting: A case study of the process of revising IAS 12 (1996), income tax
no DOI — not checkedContent anaylis for the social sciences and humanities
no DOI — not checkedInternational accounting: Standards, regulations, and financial reporting
no DOI — not checkedCIT0070
no DOI — not checkedCommunication & organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences
no DOI — not checkedThe international accounting standards committee: A political history
no DOI — not checkedContent analysis: An introduction to its methodology
no DOI — not checkedThe FASB: The people, the process, and the politics
no DOI — not checkedThe content analysis guidebook
no DOI — not checkedGroups at work: Theory and research
no DOI — not checkedGroups at work: Theory and research
no DOI — not checkedCIT0112
no DOI — not checkedCIT0115
no DOI — not checkedPositive accounting theory
no DOI — not checkedComparative international accounting
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/17449480.2018.1501502"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/17449480.2018.1501502/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1080/17449480.2018.1501502)