Reference health

University Knowledge Transfer: Private Ownership, Incentives, and Local Development Objectives

https://doi.org/10.1086/595763
CiteStamped reference-health badge
29/29 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/261702
Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279
Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT
resolves10.2307/2118358
Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts
resolves10.1162/003355305774268192
Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data*
resolves10.1162/qjec.122.2.729
Incentives for Managers and Inequality among Workers: Evidence from a Firm-Level Experiment
resolves10.2307/1912844
Common Agency
resolves10.1257/0002828054201413
Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents
resolves10.1111/1467-937X.00097
Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms
resolves10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00108-7
Individual effects and dynamics in count data models
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
Toward a new economics of science
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?
resolves10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00075-X
‘Public service motivation’ as an argument for government provision
resolves10.1162/003465398557221
Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988
resolves10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24
Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design
resolves10.2307/2696403
Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies
resolves10.2307/2118401
Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations
resolves10.1257/aer.91.1.240
Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions
resolves10.1023/A:1007884111883
Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities
resolves10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00083-3
Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: ‘The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with’
resolves10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x
Incentives and invention in universities
resolves10.1257/aer.90.5.1346
Performance Pay and Productivity
resolves10.1257/aer.90.2.410
The Power of Incentives
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.06.001
Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.017
Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge?
resolves10.1086/341874
The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives
resolves10.1093/oxrep/grm036
Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedPrivate‐Sector Focus and the Process of Innovation. Working Paper No. 11542
no DOI — not checkedrf5
no DOI — not checkedrf16
no DOI — not checkedContract Structure and Performance of Technology Transfer Agreements: Evidence from University Licenses. Working paper
no DOI — not checkedThe NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Working Paper No. 8498
no DOI — not checkedIntermediation in Innovation. Discussion Paper No. 4891
no DOI — not checkedrf24
no DOI — not checkedAn Agency Theoretic Study of the Relationship between Knowledge Agents and University Technology Transfer Offices. Working paper
no DOI — not checkedQuality and Entry: How Has the Bayh‐Dole Act Affected U
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/595763"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/595763/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/595763/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/595763)