Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 107 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked16 84 Stat 1242
no DOI — not checkedSeventh Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act 20 (Mar 10
no DOI — not checkedWash Post A01 (Nov 7
no DOI — not checkedConstantine (July 25, 1997
no DOI — not checkedOrrin Hatch on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (June 5
no DOI — not checked144 Cong Rec H 4240 (June 5
no DOI — not checkedp_n_14
no DOI — not checkedp_n_15
no DOI — not checkedp_n_16
no DOI — not checkedp_n_17
no DOI — not checkedp_n_18
no DOI — not checked34 126 S Ct at 923
no DOI — not checkedquoting Thompson Medical Co. v FTC, 791 F2d 189, 192 (DC Cir
no DOI — not checkedp_n_24
no DOI — not checkedp_n_28
no DOI — not checkedp_n_29
no DOI — not checkedp_n_30
no DOI — not checkedBureaucratic Drift, Coalitional Drift, and Time Consistency, 8 J L Econ & Org 111
no DOI — not checkedp_n_37
no DOI — not checkedp_n_41
no DOI — not checkedPower of the Purse
no DOI — not checkedEmerson H. Tiller, Controlling Policy by Controlling Process: Judicial Influence on Regulatory Decision-Making, 14 J L Econ & Org 114
no DOI — not checkedJohn E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson, eds, Can the Government Govern? 267 (Brookings
no DOI — not checkedA Strategic Theory of Bureacratic Redundancy, 47 Am J Pol Sci 274, 287
no DOI — not checkedp_n_53
no DOI — not checkedp_n_56
no DOI — not checked94 Cal L Rev at 1704 (cited in note 47)
no DOI — not checkedNormal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies 332 (Princeton
no DOI — not checkedSee also Jonathan B. Bendor
no DOI — not checked55 Pub Admin Rev 193, 193
no DOI — not checkedPolitics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy 160 (Michigan
no DOI — not checked(competition decreases cost of monitoring)
no DOI — not checkedp_n_70
no DOI — not checkedp_n_71
no DOI — not checked("To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law.")
no DOI — not checkedp_n_78
no DOI — not checkedp_n_79
no DOI — not checkedp_n_80
no DOI — not checkedp_n_81
no DOI — not checkedp_n_82
no DOI — not checkedp_n_84
no DOI — not checkedp_n_85
no DOI — not checkedp_n_86
no DOI — not checkedp_n_87
no DOI — not checkedp_n_88
no DOI — not checkedp_n_89
no DOI — not checkedp_n_90
no DOI — not checkedp_n_91
no DOI — not checkedp_n_97
no DOI — not checkedChevron's Nondelegation Doctrine
no DOI — not checkedHow Mead Has Muddled Judicial Review of Agency Action, 58 Vand L Rev 1443, 1457
no DOI — not checkedp_n_108
no DOI — not checkedp_n_109
no DOI — not checkedp_n_112
no DOI — not checkedp_n_114
no DOI — not checkedp_n_116
no DOI — not checkedp_n_123
no DOI — not checkeddissenting). 95 604 F2d 1187 (9th Cir
no DOI — not checkedv Exxon Corp., 586 F2d 726 (9th Cir
no DOI — not checkedp_n_133
no DOI — not checkedp_n_134
no DOI — not checkedSee also Timothy K. Armstrong
no DOI — not checkedcodified as amended at 33 USC § 701 et seq
no DOI — not checkedp_n_143
no DOI — not checkedPennsylvania v ICC, 561 F2d 278, 292 (DC Cir
no DOI — not checkedp_n_157
no DOI — not checked102 Mich L Rev at 746-47 (cited in note 13)
no DOI — not checkedp_n_161
no DOI — not checkedp_n_164
no DOI — not checkedRapaport v Office of Thrift Supervision, 59 F3d 212 (DC Cir
no DOI — not checkedp_n_173
no DOI — not checkedp_n_176
no DOI — not checkedp_n_180
no DOI — not checkedp_n_182
no DOI — not checkedp_n_188
no DOI — not checkedp_n_191
no DOI — not checked67 U Chi L Rev 315 (cited in note 2)
no DOI — not checkedp_n_193
no DOI — not checkedp_n_196
no DOI — not checked89 Geo L J 833 at 844 n 54 (cited in note 65)
no DOI — not checkedp_n_203
no DOI — not checkedp_n_205
no DOI — not checkedp_n_207
no DOI — not checked89 Geo L J at 910 (cited in note 65)
no DOI — not checkedChevron Deference to Agency Interpretations That Delimit the Scope of the Agency's Jurisdiction, 61 U Chi L Rev 957, 969-70
no DOI — not checkedWilliam A. Niskanen, Jr., Bureaucracy and Representative Government 36-42 (Aldine
no DOI — not checkedp_n_224
no DOI — not checkedEmpire-Building Government in Constitutional Law, 118 Harv L Rev 915, 935
no DOI — not checkedp_n_228
no DOI — not checkedp_n_231
no DOI — not checkedp_n_234
no DOI — not checkedredesignated at 38 Fed Reg 26609 (Sept 24
no DOI — not checkedp_n_239
no DOI — not checkedp_n_241
no DOI — not checkedp_n_242
no DOI — not checkedp_n_247
no DOI — not checkedp_n_249
no DOI — not checkedp_n_250
no DOI — not checkedp_n_258
no DOI — not checkedp_n_260
no DOI — not checkedp_n_261
no DOI — not checkedp_n_263
no DOI — not checkedRecall that in Sutton, the Court rejected an argument that EEOC could receive Chevron deference for its interpretation of "disability
no DOI — not checkedp_n_267
no DOI — not checkedp_n_272
no DOI — not checkedp_n_274
no DOI — not checkedp_n_278
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.