Reference health
What Can Survey Forecasts Tell Us about Information Rigidities?
33/33 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.09.001
Predictability in financial markets: What do survey expectations tell us?
resolves10.1016/j.jmacro.2011.03.002
Geography, skills or both: What explains Fed watchers’ forecast accuracy of US monetary policy?
resolves10.1016/j.jedc.2005.11.002
Sticky information and model uncertainty in survey data on inflation expectations
resolves10.1162/00335530360535207
Macroeconomic Expectations of Households and Professional Forecasters
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.03.016
What do technology shocks tell us about the New Keynesian paradigm?
resolves10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.1.122
Biases in Macroeconomic Forecasts: Irrationality or Asymmetric Loss?
resolves10.1016/S0304-3932(96)01282-2
This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship
resolves10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00017.x
A Quantitative Comparison of Sticky‐Price and Sticky‐Information Models of Price Setting
resolves10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00353.x
A Tale of Two Rigidities: Sticky Prices in a Sticky‐Information Environment
resolves10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.04.006
Empirical comparison of sticky price and sticky information models
resolves10.1162/003355302320935034
Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.07.001
Why do forecasters disagree? Lessons from the term structure of cross-sectional dispersion
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. 222, European Central Bank
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. 307, Banque de France
no DOI — not checkedFed. Reserve Bank San Francisco Proceedings, http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedfpr/y2007x5.html.
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of Monetary Economics
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. 16537, NBER
no DOI — not checkedrf16
no DOI — not checkedrf20
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. w14184, NBER
no DOI — not checkedrf24
no DOI — not checkedrf30
no DOI — not checkedrf32
no DOI — not checkedrf39
no DOI — not checkedrf40
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of Economic Forecasting
no DOI — not checkedFinance and Economics Discussion Paper no. 1998-43
no DOI — not checkedrf50
no DOI — not checkedrf52
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. 15208, NBER
no DOI — not checkedKnowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics: In Honor of Edmund Phelps
no DOI — not checkedInterest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/665662"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/665662/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/665662)