Reference health

Who Should Be Afraid of the Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox?

https://doi.org/10.1086/668875
CiteStamped reference-health badge
17/17 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/sim.4780121510
The role of<i>P</i>‐values in analysing trial results
resolves10.1086/425064
Methodology in Practice: Statistical Misspecification Testing
resolves10.1023/A:1018502622516
Discussion of papers by Dempster and Aitkin
resolves10.1017/CBO9781316534960
Logic of Statistical Inference
resolves10.1007/978-1-4757-1923-9
Testing Statistical Hypotheses
resolves10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187
A STATISTICAL PARADOX
resolves10.1214/lnms/1215466210
The likelihood principle
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226511993.001.0001
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge
resolves10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2
Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis
resolves10.1080/01621459.1987.10478396
Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing Problem
resolves10.1198/000313001300339950
Calibration of <i>ρ</i> Values for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses
resolves10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0
Theoretical Statistics
resolves10.1214/ss/1056397485
Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing?
resolves10.1214/ss/1030037904
Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511806285
Evidence and Evolution
resolves10.1086/656009
Is Frequentist Testing Vulnerable to the Base-Rate Fallacy?
resolves10.1093/bjps/axl003
Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedReview of Likelihood: An Account of the Statistical Concept of Likelihood and Its Application to Scientific Inference, by A. F. Edwards
no DOI — not checkedPhilosophy of Statistics, Handbook of Philosophy of Science
no DOI — not checkedTheory of Probability
no DOI — not checkedMisplaced Criticisms of Neyman-Pearson (N-P) Testing in the Case of Two Simple Hypotheses
no DOI — not checkedThe Bayesian Choice
no DOI — not checkedScientific Reasoning: A Bayesian Approach
no DOI — not checkedBayes’s Theorem
no DOI — not checkedAn Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Theory and Methods
no DOI — not checkedTesting a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
no DOI — not checkedTesting Precise Hypotheses
no DOI — not checkedLindley’s Paradox
no DOI — not checkedStatistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/668875"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/668875/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/668875/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/668875)