Reference health
Magnitude, Time, and Risk Differ Similarly between Joint and Single Evaluations
56/56 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
1 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 56 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/658339
On Intertemporal Selfishness: How the Perceived Instability of Identity Underlies Impatient Consumption
resolves10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00025-6
Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00411.x
UNCERTAIN LIFETIME AND INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE: RISK AVERSION AS A RATIONALE FOR TIME DISCOUNTING*
resolves10.1002/bdm.616
The susceptibility of mental accounting principles to evaluation mode effects
resolves10.1007/s11002-005-1137-7
Consumer Choices Under Small Probabilities: Overweighting or Underweighting?
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0671
The Fragility of Time: Time-Insensitivity and Valuation of the Near and Far Future
resolves10.1093/qje/121.4.1283
The Uncertainty Effect: When a Risky Prospect is Valued Less than its Worst Possible Outcome
resolves10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S23
Increasing Saving Behavior Through Age-Progressed Renderings of the Future Self
resolves10.1006/obhd.1996.0077
The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.576
Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.680
Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation.
resolves10.1152/jn.00177.2009
An “As Soon As Possible” Effect in Human Intertemporal Decision Making: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Mechanisms
resolves10.1287/mnsc.47.12.1712.10239
What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Under Uncertainty?
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.05.003
The effect of regulatory focus on the shape of probability-weighting function: Evidence from a cross-modality matching method
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.003
The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations
resolves10.1257/000282802762024692
Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The “More Is Less” Phenomenon
resolves10.1509/jmkr.43.4.618
Deferring versus Expediting Consumption: The Effect of Outcome Concreteness on Sensitivity to Time Horizon
resolves10.1006/obhd.1999.2828
Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences
resolves10.2307/3151859
Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals
resolves10.1509/jmkr.42.1.43.56889
Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<145::AID-BDM320>3.0.CO;2-4
Discounting in judgments of delay and probability
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0412
Four Score and Seven Years from Now: The Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting
resolves10.1002/bdm.482
How does preference reversal appear and disappear? Effects of the evaluation mode
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.001
Playing for peanuts: Why is risk seeking more common for low-stakes gambles?
resolves10.1509/jmkr.46.4.543
Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.23
Resource Slack and Propensity to Discount Delayed Investments of Time Versus Money.
The 1 reference without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked——— (2010), “General Evaluability Theory: An Analysis of When What We Care about Matters,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5 (September), 343–55.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/669484"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/669484/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/669484)