Reference health

When Harry Fired Sally: The Double Standard in Punishing Misconduct

https://doi.org/10.1086/718964
CiteStamped reference-health badge
55/55 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-17

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

22 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/001979397703000204
Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets
resolves10.3368/jhr.XL.4.791
An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling
resolves10.1086/426036
Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools
resolves10.1162/003355301556329
Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination
resolves10.1145/1557019.1557032
Name-ethnicity classification from open sources
resolves10.1093/qje/qjy012
Racial Bias in Bail Decisions*
resolves10.1038/442133a
Does gender matter?
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497
Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1126/science.1212382
Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226041049.001.0001
The Economics of Discrimination
resolves10.1086/259394
Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
resolves10.1257/app.2.3.228
Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors
resolves10.1177/001979390105500101
The Gender Gap in Top Corporate Jobs
resolves10.1093/qje/qjv001
Gender Identity and Relative Income within Households *
resolves10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00973.x
Outside Offers and the Gender Pay Gap: Empirical Evidence from the UK Academic Labour Market
resolves10.1086/209845
Swimming Upstream: Trends in the Gender Wage Differential in the 1980s
resolves10.1257/jel.20160995
The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.034
Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations
resolves10.1093/qje/qjw029
Stereotypes*
resolves10.1080/13545701.2011.580700
Does Hiring Discrimination Cause Gender Segregation in the Swedish Labor Market?
resolves10.1016/0169-7439(92)80050-E
Illustrating empirical Bayes methods
resolves10.1086/593073
Prejudice and Wages: An Empirical Assessment of Becker’s <i>The Economics of Discrimination</i>
resolves10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124448
Studying Discrimination: Fundamental Challenges and Recent Progress
resolves10.1257/jel.47.2.448
Gender Differences in Preferences
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01054.x
GENDER AND VARIETIES OF WHITE‐COLLAR CRIME*
resolves10.1111/ecca.12107
Gender Discrimination and Evaluators’ Gender: Evidence from Italian Academia
resolves10.1111/jofi.12613
Is Fraud Contagious? Coworker Influence on Misconduct by Financial Advisors
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01614.x
Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?
resolves10.1086/700735
The Market for Financial Adviser Misconduct
resolves10.1257/jel.20181020
Text as Data
resolves10.1257/0895330042162386
Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?
resolves10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.07.003
From Initial Appearance to Sentencing: Do Female Defendants Experience Disparate Treatment?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhv130
Who Facilitated Misreporting in Securitized Loans?
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.09.005
Beauty is the promise of happiness?
resolves10.2307/1912352
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
resolves10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.04.005
Is occupational fraud “typical” white-collar crime? A comparison of individual and organizational characteristics
resolves10.1111/1467-985X.00278
A Multilevel Cross-Classified Modelling Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Effects of Assessor and Researcher Attributes on Assessor Ratings
resolves10.1111/jofi.12243
CEO Connectedness and Corporate Fraud
resolves10.1086/318603
Racial Bias in Motor Vehicle Searches: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.02.009
Do gender stereotypes reduce girls' or boys' human capital outcomes? Evidence from a natural experiment
resolves10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
resolves10.1086/262045
The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences
resolves10.2307/2946676
Sex Discrimination in Restaurant Hiring: An Audit Study
resolves10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067
Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?
resolves10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711
Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1111/jofi.12704
The Geography of Financial Misconduct
resolves10.1111/jofi.12271
Asset Quality Misrepresentation by Financial Intermediaries: Evidence from the RMBS Market
resolves10.1111/jofi.12208
The People in Your Neighborhood: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios
resolves10.1093/revfin/hhm012
Booms, Busts, and Fraud
resolves10.1073/pnas.1314788111
How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science
resolves10.1073/pnas.0907352106
Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone
resolves10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.459
Gender and Crime: Toward a Gendered Theory of Female Offending
resolves10.1177/0003122413484150
Gender and Twenty-First-Century Corporate Crime: Female Involvement and the Gender Gap in Enron-Era Corporate Frauds
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01615.x
Corporate Fraud and Business Conditions: Evidence from IPOs
resolves10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.531
Diagnosing Discrimination: Stock Returns and Ceo Gender
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBlank
no DOI — not checkedrf5
no DOI — not checkedDiscrimination in Labor Markets
no DOI — not checkedrf12
no DOI — not checkedrf14
no DOI — not checkedThe Economics of Discrimination
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of Labor Economics
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. 20256 (June), NBER
no DOI — not checkedrf101
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of Field Experiments
no DOI — not checkedrf29
no DOI — not checkedrf35
no DOI — not checkedNBER Working Paper no. 24904 (August), NBER
no DOI — not checkedWorking paper
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper no. 2222608, Rotman School Management
no DOI — not checkedNBER Working Paper no. 25150 (October), NBER
no DOI — not checkedrf54
no DOI — not checkedWomen in Financial Services
no DOI — not checkedrf74
no DOI — not checkedWorking Paper, FINRA Office Chief Econ.
no DOI — not checkedrf100
no DOI — not checkedHow Female Bankers React to Gender Bias Today
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-17 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/718964"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/718964/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/718964/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/718964)