Reference health

The Development of the Takeover Auction Process: The Evolution of Property Rights in the Modern Wild West

https://doi.org/10.1086/719984
CiteStamped reference-health badge
55/55 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

22 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.06.002
Negotiations under the threat of an auction
resolves10.1017/S0022050700076403
The Property Right Paradigm
resolves10.1257/jep.15.2.103
New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers
resolves10.1002/jae.659
Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models
resolves10.1017/S0022109017000278
Bid Resistance by Takeover Targets: Managerial Bargaining or Bad Faith?
resolves10.2307/1340571
The Case for Facilitating Competing Tender Offers
resolves10.2307/1229689
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn099
What Matters in Corporate Governance?
resolves10.1086/376950
Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences
resolves10.1093/rfs/13.4.841
Toeholds, Bid Jumps, and Expected Payoffs in Takeovers
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(94)90005-1
The costs of inefficient bargaining and financial distress
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01225.x
How Are Firms Sold?
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6622.2009.00237.x
Is There One Best Way to Sell a Company? Auctions Versus Negotiations and Controlled Sales<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1086/250068
Toeholds and Takeovers
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.003
Do takeover laws matter? Evidence from five decades of hostile takeovers
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2252
Discipline or Disruption? Stakeholder Relationships and the Effect of Takeover Threat
resolves10.1086/655805
Management Quality and Antitakeover Provisions
resolves10.1086/466549
The Federal Communications Commission
resolves10.1086/466560
The Problem of Social Cost
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(94)00823-J
Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures
resolves10.2307/2555697
The Costs of Conflict Resolution and Financial Distress: Evidence from the Texaco-Pennzoil Litigation
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(83)90016-8
Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.07.013
Preemptive bidding, target resistance, and takeover premiums
resolves10.2307/1340753
The Proper Role of a Target's Management in Responding to a Tender Offer
resolves10.1017/S0022109019001091
Rethinking Measures of Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Deal Premiums
resolves10.1093/rcfs/cfaa024
Crisis Poison Pills*
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.07.005
Board of directors' responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence from shareholder proposals
resolves10.2307/2555399
A Theory of Preemptive Takeover Bidding
resolves10.1086/296273
Sealed Bids, Sunk Costs, and the Process of Competition
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.009
Optimal toeholds in takeover contests
resolves10.1162/00335530360535162
Corporate Governance and Equity Prices
resolves10.1111/jofi.12194
Strategic and Financial Bidders in Takeover Auctions
resolves10.2307/1229199
Just Vote No: A Minimalist Strategy for Dealing with Barbarians inside the Gates
resolves10.2307/1072985
Property Rights in Assets and Resistance to Tender Offers
resolves10.1093/ei/39.1.30
Auctions of companies
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.004
What drives merger waves?
resolves10.1086/503648
On the Use of Poison Pills and Defensive Payouts by Takeover Targets*
resolves10.1086/467078
The Wealth Effects of Litigation by Targets: Do Interests Diverge in a Merge?
resolves10.1086/466965
The Economic Effects of Federal and State Regulations of Cash Tender Offers
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.03.008
The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firms
resolves10.1257/jep.23.1.121
Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity
resolves10.1111/jofi.12600
Institutional and Legal Context in Natural Experiments: The Case of State Antitakeover Laws
resolves10.2308/accr-52444
The Information Provision in the Corporate Acquisition Process: Why Target Firms Obtain Multiple Fairness Opinions
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.01.005
How has takeover competition changed over time?
resolves10.1017/S0022109018000509
Deal Initiation in Mergers and Acquisitions
resolves10.1086/261682
Do Bad Bidders Become Good Targets?
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(95)00860-H
The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity
resolves10.1257/mic.20160290
A Theory of Indicative Bidding
resolves10.2307/1228929
The White Knight Privilege in Litigated Takeovers: Leveling the Playing Field in Discovery
resolves10.1086/467562
Why Is the Common Law Efficient?
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(95)00865-C
Markup pricing in mergers and acquisitions
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00301
Hostility in Takeovers: In the Eyes of the Beholder?
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(88)90039-6
Managerial control of voting rights
resolves10.2307/1372587
Poison Pills and Litigation Uncertainty
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedrf2
no DOI — not checkedrf3
no DOI — not checkedrf7
no DOI — not checkedrf12
no DOI — not checkedrf13
no DOI — not checkedCorporate Anti-takeover Defenses: The Poison Pill Device
no DOI — not checkedrf21
no DOI — not checkedBarbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco
no DOI — not checkedrf29
no DOI — not checkedrf39
no DOI — not checkedrf40
no DOI — not checkedrf41
no DOI — not checkedAuctions with Endogenous Initiation. Working paper
no DOI — not checkedrf51
no DOI — not checkedrf56
no DOI — not checkedrf59
no DOI — not checkedrf60
no DOI — not checkedOfficer
no DOI — not checkedrf64
no DOI — not checkedrf68
no DOI — not checkedrf71
no DOI — not checkedrf76
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/719984"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/719984/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/719984/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1086/719984)