Reference health
Old-growth forest loss and secondary forest recovery across Amazonian countries
1 of 56 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-22
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5194/bg-11-7305-204
The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00908.x
Deforestation and Reforestation of <scp>L</scp>atin <scp>A</scp>merica and the <scp>C</scp>aribbean (2001–2010)
resolves10.1111/jiec.12958
The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026
Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil
resolves10.1111/gcb.12627
A large‐scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human‐modified tropical forests
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142839
Carbon loss and removal due to forest disturbance and regeneration in the Amazon
resolves10.1111/gcb.15029
Satellite‐based estimates reveal widespread forest degradation in the Amazon
resolves10.1126/sciadv.1501639
Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics
resolves10.1111/btp.12381
Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/ab79e6
Fostering natural forest regeneration on former agricultural land through economic and policy interventions
resolves10.1111/conl.12709
Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration
resolves10.3390/land7040136
Changes in Human Population Density and Protected Areas in Terrestrial Global Biodiversity Hotspots, 1995–2015
resolves10.1002/ecy.2954
Assessing the growth and climate sensitivity of secondary forests in highly deforested Amazonian landscapes
resolves10.5751/ES-09364-220327
Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/abe0ed
Have food supply chain policies improved forest conservation and rural livelihoods? A systematic review
resolves10.1038/s41586-021-03629-6
Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change
resolves10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress
resolves10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1159:TECOSA]2.0.CO;2
The Ecological Consequences of Socioeconomic and Land-Use Changes in Postagriculture Puerto Rico
resolves10.1038/s41467-021-22050-1
Large carbon sink potential of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon to mitigate climate change
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0181092
Spatial and temporal dynamics of shifting cultivation in the middle-Amazonas river: Expansion and intensification
resolves10.1111/brv.12694
The role of land‐use history in driving successional pathways and its implications for the restoration of tropical forests
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.007
Suriname: Reconciling agricultural development and conservation of unique natural wealth
resolves10.1111/gcb.14443
Second rate or a second chance? Assessing biomass and biodiversity recovery in regenerating Amazonian forests
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x
CO
<sub>2</sub>
balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database
resolves10.1111/1365-2664.13060
Model selection using information criteria, but is the “best” model any good?
resolves10.1111/gcb.14824
Secondary forest fragments offer important carbon and biodiversity cobenefits
resolves10.1126/science.abb3021
Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1111/anzs.12200
Interval estimation for the breakpoint in segmented regression: a smoothed score‐based approach
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.001
Forest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peru: Livelihood strategies, poverty and wealth in an Amazon frontier
resolves10.1038/s41558-021-01026-5
Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1111/gcb.14767
Estimating aboveground net biomass change for tropical and subtropical forests: Refinement of IPCC default rates using forest plot data
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.024
The drivers of tree cover expansion: Global, temperate, and tropical zone analyses
resolves10.1073/pnas.1019576108
Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01323.x
Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122424
Forest regeneration in the Brazilian Amazon: Public policies and economic conditions
resolves10.3389/ffgc.2020.00085
Reversals of Reforestation Across Latin America Limit Climate Mitigation Potential of Tropical Forests
resolves10.1111/gcb.15352
Secondary forests offset less than 10% of deforestation‐mediated carbon emissions in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.1126/sciadv.1601047
Types and rates of forest disturbance in Brazilian Legal Amazon, 2000–2013
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108994
The COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to weaken environmental protection in Brazil
resolves10.1038/s41893-019-0470-4
Upturn in secondary forest clearing buffers primary forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkederlac1701bib17
no DOI — not checkedGlobal ecological zones for FAO forest reporting: 2010 update
no DOI — not checkedPRODES
no DOI — not checkederlac1701bib47
no DOI — not checkederlac1701bib48
no DOI — not checkedMitigation pathways compatible with 1.5 °C in the context of sustainable development
no DOI — not checkederlac1701bib56
no DOI — not checkedAssisted natural regeneration: harnessing nature for restoration
no DOI — not checkedUN decade on restoration
no DOI — not checkederlac1701bib66
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1701"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1701/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1701)