Reference health
Optimal bandwidth choice for robust bias-corrected inference in regression discontinuity designs
35/35 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-16
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 35 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2016.01.024
Optimal bandwidth selection for the fuzzy regression discontinuity estimator
resolves10.3982/QE590
Simultaneous selection of optimal bandwidths for the sharp regression discontinuity estimator
resolves10.1080/01621459.2017.1285776
On the Effect of Bias Estimation on Coverage Accuracy in Nonparametric Inference
resolves10.3982/ECTA11757
Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs
resolves10.1515/jci-2013-0010
Randomization Inference in the Regression Discontinuity Design: An Application to Party Advantages in the U.S. Senate
resolves10.1002/pam.21985
Comparing Inference Approaches for RD Designs: A Reexamination of the Effect of Head Start on Child Mortality
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.03.006
Robust uniform inference for quantile treatment effects in regression discontinuity designs
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00510
Identifying the Effect of Changing the Policy Threshold in Regression Discontinuity Models
resolves10.1080/07350015.2017.1366909
Why High-Order Polynomials Should Not Be Used in Regression Discontinuity Designs
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00183
Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design
resolves10.3982/QE864
When does regression discontinuity design work? Evidence from random election outcomes
resolves10.1162/qjec.122.1.159
Does Head Start Improve Children's Life Chances? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.12.008
Extending the regression-discontinuity approach to multiple assignment variables
resolves10.1108/S0731-905320170000038001
On Interpreting the Regression Discontinuity Design as a Local Experiment
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCoverage error optimal confidence intervals for local polynomial regression
no DOI — not checkedA Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Extensions
no DOI — not checkedThe choice of neighborhood in regression discontinuity designs
no DOI — not checkedRegression discontinuity designs with a continuous treatment
no DOI — not checkedLocal Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications
no DOI — not checkedWild bootstrap for fuzzy regression discontinuity designs: Obtaining robust bias-corrected confidence intervals
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1093/ectj/utz022"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1093/ectj/utz022/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1093/ectj/utz022)