Reference health
When Do Banks Listen to Their Analysts? Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions
1 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-25
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2329556
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00465
Institutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence
resolves10.1016/j.qref.2009.02.002
Put your money where your mouth is: Do financial firms follow their own recommendations?
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00086-6
Stockholder gains from focusing versus diversifying bank mergers
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.005
The market for certification by external parties: Evidence from underwriting and banking relationships☆
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn116
The Effectiveness of Reputation as a Disciplinary Mechanism in Sell-Side Research
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn109
Conflicts of Interest and Stock Recommendations: The Effects of the Global Settlement and Related Regulations
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.06.001
Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates?
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.004
Conflicts of interest in sell-side research and the moderating role of institutional investors
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00837.x
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.009
Do accurate earnings forecasts facilitate superior investment recommendations?
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.10.002
Information flows within financial conglomerates: Evidence from the banks–mutual funds relation
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.001
The economics of conflicts of interest in financial institutions
resolves10.1093/rfs/12.4.653
Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00745.x
Wealth Destruction on a Massive Scale? A Study of Acquiring‐Firm Returns in the Recent Merger Wave
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00247-7
Voting with their feet: institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn053
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00720.x
The Effect of Banking Relationships on the Firm's IPO Underpricing
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00483
Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized versus Hierarchical Firms
resolves10.2139/ssrn.596201
Does Joint Production of Lending and Underwriting Help or Hurt Firms? A Fixed Effects Approach
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1093/rfs/hhq087"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1093/rfs/hhq087/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1093/rfs/hhq087)