The spatial distribution and size of rook (<i>Corvus frugilegus</i>) breeding colonies is affected by both the distribution of foraging habitat and by intercolony competition
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
The Population of Rooks (Corvus frugilegus) in West Gloucestershire. II
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAnonymous 1936 A census of rookeries in Greater Edinburgh. Scot. Nat. 53^56.
no DOI — not checkedBarnes S. L. 1997 Home range analysis and habitat selection in rooks Corvus frugilegus L. in County Durham. MSc thesis University of Durham UK.
no DOI — not checkedRookeries and roosts of the rook and jackdaw in south-west Cornwall
no DOI — not checkedEcological studies of the rook (Corvus frugilegus L.) in north-east Scotland: food intake and feeding behaviour
no DOI — not checkedFuller R. M. Groom G. B. & Jones A. R. 1994 The land cover map of Great Britain. An automated classi¢cation of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 60 553^562.
no DOI — not checkedGoodchild M. F. 1986 Spatial autocorrelation. Norwich UK: Geo Books.
no DOI — not checkedGri¤n L. R. 1998 The distribution and abundance of the rook Corvus frugilegus L. as in£uenced by habitat suitability and competitive interactions. PhD thesis University of Durham UK.
no DOI — not checkedLack D. 1966 Population studies of birds. Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedThe population ecology of the rook
no DOI — not checkedTabachnick B. G. & Fidell L. S. 1996 Using multivariate statistics 3rd edn. New York: HarperCollins.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.