Reference health

A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services

https://doi.org/10.1101/017467
CiteStamped reference-health badge
14 of 79 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-23

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.023.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.014.
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01980.x.
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01388.x.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005.
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_1.
does not resolve to a known work10.1126/science.1258832.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016.
does not resolve to a known work10.1080/21513732.2012.663792.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03. 041.
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/s10980-010-9495-9.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.01.002.
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/S0167-1987(99) 00106-3
The 65 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.066
Long-Term Global Trends in Crop Yield and Production Reveal No Current Pollination Shortage but Increasing Pollinator Dependency
resolves10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6
The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems
resolves10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0035:LEATFI]2.0.CO;2
Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04192.x
CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.059
A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x
Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004
Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
resolves10.1007/s10113-010-0185-6
Landscape multifunctionality: a powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change
resolves10.1073/pnas.1210590110
Interactive effects among ecosystem services and management practices on crop production: Pollination in coffee agroforestry systems
resolves10.1016/0016-7061(93)90002-3
Soils as biotic constructs favouring net primary productivity
resolves10.3097/LO.200915
Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - A concept for land-cover based assessments
resolves10.1073/pnas.0808772106
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379
Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services
resolves10.1073/pnas.1114773109
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda
resolves10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x
Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review
resolves10.1201/9780429246593
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
resolves10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services
resolves10.5751/es-04853-170322
Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006
Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
resolves10.1098/rstb.2007.2169
The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture
resolves10.4324/9780203441220_chapter_13
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING INSTITUTIONS
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.037
Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise
resolves10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x
Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?
resolves10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175
Habitat Management to Conserve Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests in Agriculture
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0035954
Spatial and Temporal Trends of Global Pollination Benefit
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.006
Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x
Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services
resolves10.5751/ES-05873-180226
Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World
resolves10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment
resolves10.1017/S0376892907004067
Influence of user characteristics on valuation of ecosystem services in Doñana Natural Protected Area (south-west Spain)
resolves10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.011
Bridging the gaps between agricultural policy, land-use and biodiversity
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services
resolves10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z
The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.003
Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.006
An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options
resolves10.1126/science.1208742
Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.004
The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management
resolves10.1073/pnas.0907284107
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.026
Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: An assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union
resolves10.5751/ES-01667-110128
Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services
resolves10.1007/s10980-014-9989-y
Multifunctionality of floodplain landscapes: relating management options to ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.035
Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead
resolves10.1038/nature11069
Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture
resolves10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6
Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture
resolves10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.t01-1-00256.x
Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space
resolves10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management
resolves10.1177/875647939000600106
Interpretation of the Correlation Coefficient: A Basic Review
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-419964-4.00018-4
CICES Going Local
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.004
Mapping global land system archetypes
resolves10.1006/jeem.1994.1008
Choices without Prices without Apologies
resolves10.1073/pnas.1011078107
Trading carbon for food: Global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.014
Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.022
A multi-scale modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024
Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBerkes, F. , Folke, C. , 1998. Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainabitliy, in: Berkes, F. , Folke, C. (Eds.), Linking sociological and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.
no DOI — not checkedCork, S. , Stoneham, G. , Lowe, K. , 2007. Ecosystem Services and Australian Natural Resource Management (NRM) Futures. Technical Report. the Ecosystem Services Working Group of the Natural Resource Policies and Programs Committee.
no DOI — not checkedFaraway, J.J. , 2005. Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Taylor & Francis Inc.
no DOI — not checkedWild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance
no DOI — not checkedHaines-Young, R. , Potschin, M. , 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Technical Report. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003.
no DOI — not checkedHinkel, D. , Wiersma, W. , Jurs, S. , 2003. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
no DOI — not checkedHolling, C.S. , 1996. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, in: Schulze, P. (Ed.), Engineering Within Ecological Constraints. National Academy of Engineering, pp. 31–44.
no DOI — not checkedLanders, D.H. , Nahlik, A.M. , 2013. Final Ecosystem Goods and Services Classification System (FEGS-CS). Technical Report EPA/600/R-13/ORD-004914. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
no DOI — not checkedLegendre, P. , Legendre, L. , 2003. Numerical ecology. Elsevier.
no DOI — not checkedMA, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedMason, R.D. , Lind, D.A. , 1983. Statistics: An introduction. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt P.
no DOI — not checkedOECD, 2003. Multifunctionality: The policy implementation. Technical Report. OECD.
no DOI — not checkedR Core Team, 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Com-puting. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
no DOI — not checkedTabachnick, B. , Fidell, L. , 1989. Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper & Row Publishers, New York.
no DOI — not checkedNaturkapital Deutschland TEEB DE, 2014. Naturkapital und klimapolitik synergien und konflikte. kurzbericht für entscheidungsträger. Technische Universität Berlin and Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung UFZ, Leipzig.
no DOI — not checkedWeber, J.C. , Lamb, D.R. , 1970. Statistics and Research in Physical Educa-tion. Mosby.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/017467"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/017467/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/017467/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/017467)