Reference health
Studying ecosystems with DNA metabarcoding: lessons from aquatic biomonitoring
76/76 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 76 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s10661-012-3021-2
Towards generalised reference condition models for environmental assessment: a case study on rivers in Atlantic Canada
resolves10.1899/0887-3593(2006)025[0977:RORATR]2.0.CO;2
Role of rarity and taxonomic resolution in a regional and spatial analysis of stream macroinvertebrates
resolves10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05519.x
Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next‐generation DNA sequencing
resolves10.1186/s12302-018-0157-x
DNA metabarcoding reveals the complex and hidden responses of chironomids to multiple stressors
resolves10.1038/ncomms14087
Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity
resolves10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.001
Next-Generation Global Biomonitoring: Large-scale, Automated Reconstruction of Ecological Networks
resolves10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124
DEVELOPMENTS IN AQUATIC INSECT BIOMONITORING: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Approaches
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0150327
Turning Up the Heat on a Hotspot: DNA Barcodes Reveal 80% More Species of Geometrid Moths along an Andean Elevational Gradient
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.002
Confidence in ecological indicators: A framework for quantifying uncertainty components from monitoring data
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00885.x
Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices
resolves10.1007/s10750-006-0078-3
Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics
resolves10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.09.001
Linking DNA Metabarcoding and Text Mining to Create Network-Based Biomonitoring Tools: A Case Study on Boreal Wetland Macroinvertebrate Communities
resolves10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306
Uses and Misuses of Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Science and Conservation
resolves10.1086/696613
Identifying North American freshwater invertebrates using DNA barcodes: are existing COI sequence libraries fit for purpose?
resolves10.1071/MF15108
Big data opportunities and challenges for assessing multiple stressors across scales in aquatic ecosystems
resolves10.1002/ece3.4552
Accounting for observation processes across multiple levels of uncertainty improves inference of species distributions and guides adaptive sampling of environmental <scp>DNA</scp>
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00575.x
The effect of fixed‐count subsampling on macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in small streams
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00793.x
Spatial variation in the distribution of stream invertebrates: implications of patchiness for models of community organization
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01502.x
Local disturbance history and habitat parameters influence the microdistribution of stream invertebrates
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0130324
Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol
resolves10.3389/fenvs.2017.00038
Corrigendum: Validation and Development of COI Metabarcoding Primers for Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment
resolves10.1002/ece3.3192
Sorting things out: Assessing effects of unequal specimen biomass on <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding
resolves10.1111/2041-210X.12789
Assessing strengths and weaknesses of DNA metabarcoding‐based macroinvertebrate identification for routine stream monitoring
resolves10.1038/s41598-017-13157-x
DNA metabarcoding and morphological macroinvertebrate metrics reveal the same changes in boreal watersheds across an environmental gradient
resolves10.1111/1755-0998.12338
Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from <scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding data
resolves10.1111/1755-0998.12508
How to limit false positives in environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and metabarcoding?
resolves10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2897:CHMHPI]2.0.CO;2
COLONIZATION HISTORY MASKS HABITAT PREFERENCES IN LOCAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF STREAM INSECTS
resolves10.1016/0043-1354(81)90160-3
An appraisal of pond-net samples for biological monitoring of lotic macro-invertebrates
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x
The cost‐effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests
resolves10.1073/pnas.1406468111
Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0138432
Large-Scale Biomonitoring of Remote and Threatened Ecosystems via High-Throughput Sequencing
resolves10.1007/s10750-006-0075-6
Assessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0017497
Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos
resolves10.1186/1472-6785-12-28
Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol
resolves10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1456:DAEOPM]2.0.CO;2
DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MEASURING THE BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF STREAMS
resolves10.1086/675225
Cryptic biodiversity in streams: a comparison of macroinvertebrate communities based on morphological and DNA barcode identifications
resolves10.1111/ele.12162
Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding
resolves10.1139/A07-010
Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates
resolves10.1007/s00442-014-3062-z
Population densities and density–area relationships in a community with advective dispersal and variable mosaics of resource patches
resolves10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.01.001
Why We Need Sustainable Networks Bridging Countries, Disciplines, Cultures and Generations for Aquatic Biomonitoring 2.0: A Perspective Derived From the DNAqua-Net COST Action
resolves10.1007/s10021-010-9394-6
Direct Measurement Versus Surrogate Indicator Species for Evaluating Environmental Change and Biodiversity Loss
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.024
Multiple-stressor effects on stream invertebrates: DNA barcoding reveals contrasting responses of cryptic mayfly species
resolves10.1086/686260
Taxonomic resolution based on DNA barcoding affects environmental signal in metacommunity structure
resolves10.1016/j.tree.2018.09.002
Microbiomes as Metacommunities: Understanding Host-Associated Microbes through Metacommunity Ecology
resolves10.3354/meps07989
Taxonomic structure and the effectiveness of surrogates in environmental monitoring: a lesson from polychaetes
resolves10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025275.49062.55
The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment
resolves10.1007/s10452-013-9460-1
The tiny mayfly in the room: implications of size-dependent invertebrate taxonomic identification for biomonitoring data properties
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.002
The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems
resolves10.1007/s10661-009-1161-9
Effect of fixed-fraction subsampling on macroinvertebrate bioassessment of rivers
resolves10.1002/iroh.201601850
Causes and consequences of biotic homogenization in freshwater ecosystems
resolves10.1111/mec.14478
Scaling up: A guide to high‐throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis
resolves10.2307/1468175
The Reference Condition: A Comparison of Multimetric and Multivariate Approaches to Assess Water-Quality Impairment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates
resolves10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025270.10807.10
The effect of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes
resolves10.1126/science.aav9295
Researchers launch plan to sequence 66,000 species in the United Kingdom. But that’s just a start
resolves10.1086/678948
Performance of the standard CABIN method: comparison of BEAST models and error rates to detect simulated degradation from multiple data sets
resolves10.1899/10-016.1
Can DNA barcodes of stream macroinvertebrates improve descriptions of community structure and water quality?
resolves10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00247-4
The influence of data transformations on biological monitoring studies using macroinvertebrates
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.005
Essential Biodiversity Variables for measuring change in global freshwater biodiversity
resolves10.1111/nph.14356
Forecasting pollination declines through DNA barcoding: the potential contributions of macroecological and macroevolutionary scales of inquiry
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.024
Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: Scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France)
resolves10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[691:UMIMAS]2.0.CO;2
Unionid mussels influence macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in streams
resolves10.1073/pnas.1312779110
Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0125485
Molecular Barcoding of Aquatic Oligochaetes: Implications for Biomonitoring
resolves10.1007/s10750-006-0074-7
Influence of macroinvertebrate sample size on bioassessment of streams
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00039.x
A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data
resolves10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x
Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring
resolves10.1111/eva.12694
Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedStream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: a comparison of large-scale programs
no DOI — not checkedClarke, R. (2009) Uncertainty in WFD assessments for rivers based on macroinvertebrates and RIVPACS. Integrated catchment science programme Science report: SC060044/SR4, pp. 1–87. Bristol, UK.
no DOI — not checkedECCC (2018) CABIN Canadian Aquatic Biomonitoring Network. Environment and Climate Change Canada, https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/13564ca4-e330-40a5-9521-bfb1be767147
no DOI — not checkedFurse, M. et.al. (2006) The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods, pp. 3–29. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
no DOI — not checkedGRDI-Ecobiomics (2017) Ecobiomics: Metagenomics Based Ecosystem Biomonitoring Project, Government of Canada, Genomics R&D Initiative, Year-End Performance Report for Shared Priority Projects (2017-2018).
no DOI — not checkedModelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities
no DOI — not checkedBiomonitoring for the 21st Century: new perspectives in an age of globalisation and emerging environmental threats
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/578591"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/578591/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1101/578591)