Reference health
Factors affecting the performance of water utility companies
54/54 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 54 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0957-1787(02)00065-6
The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry
resolves10.1080/02642060308565628
Capital Utilisation and Scale in the English and Welsh Water Industry
resolves10.1080/02642060000000050
Total Factor Productivity Growth and Technical Change in the Water and Sewerage Industry
resolves10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00092-1
From public to private to … mutual? Restructuring water supply governance in England and Wales
resolves10.2307/3146322
An Examination of the Effect of Ownership on the Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Water Utilities
resolves10.1016/0166-0462(95)02107-8
Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities
resolves10.1016/S0957-1787(03)00035-3
Benchmarking in the Latin American water sector: the case of Peru
resolves10.1086/466927
A Test of the Property-Rights Theory of the Firm: Water Utilities in the United States
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00106.x
Estimating the Relative Efficiency of Brazilian Publicly and Privately Owned Water Utilities: A Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1007/s11123-007-0050-x
DEA-R: ratio-based comparative efficiency model, its mathematical relation to DEA and its use in applications
resolves10.1093/wber/16.1.139
How Different Is the Efficiency of Public and Private Water Companies in Asia?
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601475
Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysis approach
resolves10.2307/1059427
Using Homothetic Composed Error Frontiers to Measure Water Utility Efficiency
resolves10.1029/2003WR002037
Reforming the wastewater treatment sector in Italy: Implications of plant size, structure, and scale economies
resolves10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00205.x
Efficiency Measurement in Spanish Local Government: The Case of Municipal Water Services
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602247
Prior-Ratio-Analysis procedure to improve data envelopment analysis for performance measurement
resolves10.1177/0143624406070664
Financial and operational performance assessment: water/wastewater Egyptian utilities
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0084.1995.mp57003006.x
PRIVATISATION AND EFFICIENCY IN THE UK WATER INDUSTRY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1111/j.1467-940X.1998.tb00084.x
SPATIAL INTEGRATION OF URBAN WATER SERVICES AND ECONOMIES OF SCALE
resolves10.1504/IJMDM.2006.010247
A scorecard for measuring the water supply utility performance: the case of large Indian metropolises
resolves10.1111/j.1475-5890.1993.tb00482.x
Privatisation, Joint Production and the Comparative Efficiencies of Private and Public Ownership: The UK Water Industry Case
resolves10.2166/wst.2001.0758
Application of performance indicators in water utilities management - a case-study in Portugal
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.1977.tb02061.x
INVESTOR OWNED VS. PUBLICLY OWNED WATER AGENCIES: AN EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY RIGHTS THEORY OF THE FIRM<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/mde.988
The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model
resolves10.1023/A:1011162214995
Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales
resolves10.3233/IJR-120039
The comparative impact of privatization and regulation on productivity growth in the English and Welsh water and sewerage industry, 1985–99
resolves10.1007/s11123-007-0040-z
Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000
resolves10.1006/cpac.1996.0118
A Critical Financial Analysis of the Performance of Privatised Insustries: The Case of the Water Industry in England and Wales
resolves10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00303-3
The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution
resolves10.1016/j.jue.2005.09.003
Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output
resolves10.1016/j.jup.2003.11.001
Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study
resolves10.2139/ssrn.707131
Public or Private Drinking Water? The Effects of Ownership and Benchmark Competition on U.S. Water System Regulatory Compliance and Household Water Expenditures
resolves10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00098.x
Efficiency Measurement in Australian Local Government: The Case of New South Wales Municipal Water Services
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-4137
How "Natural" Are Natural Monopolies In The Water Supply And Sewerage Sector ? Case Studies From Developing And Transition Economies
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601160
Comparative performance measurement in regulation: the case of English and Welsh sewerage services
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBardelli, L. and Robotti, L. (2009), The Water Sector in Italy, CIRIEC, No. 1, CIRIEC, Liège.
no DOI — not checkedBosworth, D. and Stoneman, P. (1998), An Efficiency Study for the Water Industry. Final Report, A Report to National Economic Research Associates, National Economic Research Associates, London.
no DOI — not checkedBruggink, T. (1982), “Public versus regulated private enterprise in the municipal water industry: a comparison of operating costs”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 22, pp. 111‐25.
no DOI — not checkedConviri (2009), “Rapporto annuale al parlamento sullo stato delle risorse idriche”, available at: www.conviri.it.
no DOI — not checkedFraquelli, G. and Moiso, V. (2005), “Cost efficiency and economies of scale in the Italian water industry”, SIEP, available at: www‐3.unipv.it/websiep/wp/420.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedHutsma, J. (2003), “Water supply in California: economies of scale, water charges, efficiency and privatization”, paper presented at ERSA 2003 Congress, August.
no DOI — not checkedInternational Water Association (IWA) (2006), Performance Indicators for Water Supply Services, 2nd ed., IWA, London.
no DOI — not checkedKim, H. and Clark, R. (1988), “Economies of scale and scope in water supply”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 163‐83.
no DOI — not checkedKlase, K. (1995), “Financial performance of water and wastewater utilities: case of West Virginia service district”, PAQ, pp. 321‐41.
no DOI — not checkedMann, P. and Mikesell, J. (1976), “Ownership and water system operation”, Water Resources Bullettin, Vol. 13, pp. 777‐81.
no DOI — not checkedMartins, R., Fortunato, A. and Coelho, F. (2006), Cost Structure of the Portuguese Water Industry: A Cubic Cost Function Application, GEMF, No. 9, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra.
no DOI — not checkedOECD (2010), Pricing Water Resources and Water and Sanitation Services, OECD Publishing, Paris.
no DOI — not checkedOFWAT (2003), Updating the Overall Performance Assessment (OPA) – A Consultation, OFWAT, Birmingham, December.
no DOI — not checkedSMAT (2007), International Statistics for Water Supply, SMAT, Torino, August.
no DOI — not checkedStone and Webster Consultants for OFWAT (2004), Investigation into Evidence for Economies of Scale in the Water and Sewerage Industry in England and Wales: Final Report, Stone and Webster Consultants, London.
no DOI — not checkedTynan, N. and Kingdom, B. (2002), “A water scorecard”, Note No 242, Viewpoint Public Policy for the Private Sector, Private Sector and Infrastructure Network, The World Bank Group, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedTynan, N. and Kingdom, B. (2005), Optimal Size for Utilities?, Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note Number 283, World Bank, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedYepes, G. and Dianderas, A. (1996), Indicators, Water and Wastewater Utilities, 2nd ed., Water and Sanitation Division of the Transportation, Water and Urban Development Department, TWUWS, published informally by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank, Washington, DC.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1108/09513551111163657"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1108/09513551111163657/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1108/09513551111163657)