Reference health

Epistemic sabotage: The production and disqualification of evidence in disability benefit claims

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13593
CiteStamped reference-health badge
9 of 32 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-22

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1111/1467‐9566.12481
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/s11019‐014‐9560‐2
does not resolve to a known work10.3366/epi.2006.3.1‐2.96
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/1467‐9566.12168
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1467‐9566.2011.01448.x
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/1467‐9566.13479
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/1467‐9566.12303
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/s10597‐016‐0012‐8
does not resolve to a known work10.1136/medhum‐2021‐012198
The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/09687590903537620
Peter Townsend, disability, Fabianism and self‐organisation – an enduring difficulty. An obituary
resolves10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Using thematic analysis in psychology
resolves10.1080/09687599.2013.813837
Reporting disability in the age of austerity: the changing face of media representation of disability and disabled people in the United Kingdom and the creation of new ‘folk devils’
resolves10.1177/1350508404041998
Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings
resolves10.1177/026101830002000401
Disabled people, New Labour, benefits and work
resolves10.1080/09687599.2011.560420
‘The language of shirkers and scroungers?’ Talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform
resolves10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618
Discourse, explanation and critique
resolves10.1177/0261018315600835
‘Benefits broods’: The cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsense
resolves10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1151
Ethics and evidence based medicine
resolves10.3138/ijfab.11.1.106
From “She Would Say That, Wouldn't She?” to “Does She Take Sugar?” Epistemic Injustice and Disability
resolves10.1080/09649069.2017.1390291
Made to measure? An analysis of the transition from Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence Payment
resolves10.1080/09687599.2021.1972409
The impact of the transition to Personal Independence Payment on claimants with mental health problems
resolves10.1177/0261018317726263
‘Dead people don’t claim’: A psychopolitical autopsy of UK austerity suicides
resolves10.1332/174426421x16146990181049
Evidence, objectivity and welfare reform: a qualitative study of disability benefit assessments
resolves10.1080/09687599.2019.1680346
Feeling the benefit? Fluctuating illness and the world of welfare
resolves10.1080/09687599.2015.1021759
Personal Independence Payments, welfare reform and the shrinking disability category
resolves10.1080/09687599.2018.1514292
Living on a knife edge: the responses of people with physical health conditions to changes in disability benefits
resolves10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700012
Re-framing Stigma: Felt and Enacted Stigma and Challenges to the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions
resolves10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X
The social model of disability: An outdated ideology?
resolves10.1007/978-1-349-17753-0
The Disabled State
resolves10.1111/spol.12577
Punitive benefit sanctions, welfare conditionality, and the social abuse of unemployed people in Britain: Transforming claimants into offenders?
resolves10.1017/s1474746419000204
Welfare Conditionality in Lived Experience: Aggregating Qualitative Longitudinal Research
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCapita Business Services Ltd. (2019).Personal independence payment: Evidence for claim. Available fromhttps://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/567407/response/1364674/attach/3/Capita%20GPFR.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedCentre for Health and Disability Assessments (CHDA)Revised WCA handbook: MED‐ESAAR2011/2012HB∼001 10th March 2020. Available from:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/777221/wca‐handbook.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2010)Public consultation: Disability living allowance reform. Available from:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181633/dla‐reform‐consultation.pdf[Accessed 9th February 2022].
no DOI — not checkedDepartment for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2016).ESA113 (interactive: For use by healthcare professionals. Available fromhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/esa113‐interactive‐for‐use‐by‐healthcare‐practitioners. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2017a).DWP government's response to the second independent review of the personal independence payment assessment. Available from:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/668621/pip‐assessment‐second‐independent‐review‐government‐response.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2017b).UC50 capability for work questionnaire. Available fromhttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/671814/uc50‐interactive‐final‐0917.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2019).DWP medical reports: A guide to completion. Available fromhttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/744989/medical‐reports‐completion‐guidance.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Work and Pensions (DWP). (2006).A new deal for welfare: Empowering people to work. Available fromhttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/272235/6730.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Work and Pensions (DWP). (2018).Personal Independence Payment – providing information to support your claim. Available via:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCMRGukO1TM%26t=80s. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedDisability Benefits Consortium. (2019).Has welfare become unfair? The impact of welfare changes on disabled people. Available via:https://disabilitybenefitsconsortium.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/disability‐benefits‐consortium‐report‐has‐welfare‐become‐unfair.pdf. Accessed 1st December 2022.
no DOI — not checkedGray P.(2017).The second independent review of the personal independence payment assessment. Available from:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/personal‐independence‐payment‐pip‐assessment‐second‐independent‐review. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedHouse of Commons Work and Pensions Committee (HCWPC). (2018a).PIP and ESA assessments seventh report of session 2017‐19. Available from:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/829/829.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedLitchfield P.(2014).An independent review of the work capability assessment – year five. Available fromhttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380027/wca‐fifth‐independent‐review.pdf. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedSociologies of disability and illness: Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology
no DOI — not checkedFundamental principles of disability
no DOI — not checkedWelfare Reform Act2012(C.5). Available from:http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/5/contents/enacted. Accessed 9th February 2022.
no DOI — not checkedExploring the divide: Illness and disability
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/1467-9566.13593"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/1467-9566.13593/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/1467-9566.13593/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/1467-9566.13593)