Reference health
A home made of wood: Consumer experiences of wooden building materials
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-08
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.010
Need to repair moisture- and mould damage in different structures in finnish public buildings
resolves10.1177/0038026118764028
What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.07.001
Consumer attitudes towards timber as a construction material and towards timber frame houses – selected findings of a representative survey among the German population
resolves10.1177/1469540510391725
Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption
resolves10.1111/ijcs.12189
Young <scp>F</scp>innish and <scp>G</scp>erman consumers’ furniture acquisition – wooden, inherited or just low price?
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013
The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in europe
resolves10.1139/cjfr-2015-0123
Building material preferences with a focus on wood in urban housing: durability and environmental impacts
resolves10.3390/f9080504
Preferences for Urban Building Materials: Does Building Culture Background Matter? †
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.031
Long-term targets for green building: Explorative Delphi backcasting study on wood-frame multi-story construction in Finland
resolves10.1177/1469540513509639
Stacking wood and staying warm: Time, temporality and housework around domestic heating systems
resolves10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00039-5
Routes to home: homelessness and home-making in contrasting societies
resolves10.1080/17480272.2019.1615548
Consumers’ perceptions on the properties of wood affecting their willingness to live in and prejudices against houses made of timber
resolves10.1093/jofore/fvy025
What Does the Public Believe about Tall Wood Buildings? An Exploratory Study in the US Pacific Northwest
resolves10.1111/ijcs.12364
Promoting green buildings: Do <scp>C</scp>hinese consumers care about green building enhancements?
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.003
Consumer willingness to pay for modern wooden structures: A comparison between China and Japan
resolves10.1080/09613218.2016.1143299
Moving home: houses, new occupants and the formation of heating practices
resolves10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00804.x
The information needs of prospective homebuyers: an exploratory study of apartment purchases in Finland
resolves10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.03.013
Evaluation of aesthetic durability of waterborne polyurethane coatings applied on wood for interior applications
resolves10.1016/j.jfe.2017.05.001
The future of wooden multistory construction in the forest bioeconomy – A Delphi study from Finland and Sweden
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMain motivations and barriers for using wood in multi‐story and non‐residential construction projects
no DOI — not checkedThe Finnish multi‐story timber apartment building as a pioneer in the development of timber construction
no DOI — not checkedSocial practices, intervention and sustainability
no DOI — not checkedMinistry of the Environment. (2019).Wood building programme. [Cited 7.2.2020]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ym.fi/en‐US/Land_use_and_building/Programmes_and_strategies/Wood_Building_Program
no DOI — not checkedMarketing management: A cultural perspective
no DOI — not checkedIs interior wood use psychologically beneficial? A review of psychological responses toward wood
no DOI — not checkedMaking sense of everyday life
no DOI — not checkedConsumption: Critical concepts in the social sciences
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/ijcs.12586"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/ijcs.12586/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/ijcs.12586)