Reference health

Fallacies and false premises—a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x
CiteStamped reference-health badge
39/39 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 39 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x
An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III
resolves10.1002/tax.574001
Do the views of users of taxonomic output count for anything?
resolves10.2307/1554961
How to chop up a tree
resolves10.2307/3647353
Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa
resolves10.2307/25065576
Am I a Bony Fish?
resolves10.1002/tax.574002
Evolution in taxonomic perspective
resolves10.2307/1223771
Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification – a reply to Freudenstein
resolves10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01143.x
<i>DESATURASE‐2</i>, ENVIRONMENTAL ADAPTATION, AND SEXUAL ISOLATION IN<i>DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER</i>
resolves10.2307/25065489
Monophyly vs. paraphyly in plant systematics
resolves10.1007/BF02858525
Paraphyly, ancestors, and the goals of taxonomy: A botanical defense of cladism
resolves10.2307/25065678
Paraphyly is bad taxonomy
resolves10.2307/25065865
In defence of a conifer taxonomy which recognises evolution
resolves10.2307/2412562
The Information Content of the Phylogenetic System
resolves10.2307/1224023
Paraphyly, ancestors, and classification ‐ a response to Sosef and Brummitt
resolves10.2307/25065631
Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa—evolutionary versus cladistic classifications
resolves10.1002/tax.592001
Beyond cladistics: Extending evolutionary classifications into deeper time levels
resolves10.1002/tax.596001
Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification
resolves10.1093/sysbio/syp061
Estimating Species Trees: Methods of Phylogenetic Analysis When There Is Incongruence across Genes
resolves10.1046/j.1439-0469.2002.00211.x
Classifications and other ordering systems
resolves10.2307/3647399
Brummitt on paraphyly: a response
resolves10.1111/j.1096-0031.1990.tb00541.x
AN AMPLIFICATION OF THE PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES CONCEPT
resolves10.2307/25065296
Paraphyletic Taxa Should Be Accepted
resolves10.2307/2412566
Philosophy and the Transformation of Cladistics
resolves10.1002/tax.584001
Taxonomy versus evolution
resolves10.1002/tax.594002
Monophyly and paraphyly: A discourse without end?
resolves10.2307/25065487
Character‐based phylogenetic Linnaean classification: taxa should be both ranked and monophyletic
resolves10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002313
Phylogenetic Taxonomy
resolves10.2307/1223770
Mandatory categories and impossible hierarchies – a reply to Sosef
resolves10.2307/1224293
Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa
resolves10.2307/2419319
Explicit Approaches for Evolutionary Classification
resolves10.2307/1223772
Phylogenetic versus Linnaean taxonomy, the continuing story
resolves10.2307/25065848
The end justifies the means
resolves10.2307/2412683
Are Monotypic Genera Paraphyletic?-A Response to Norman Platnick
resolves10.1002/tax.581002
Patrocladistics, nothing new
resolves10.2307/25065565
150 reasons for paraphyly: a response
resolves10.1002/tax.574011
Evolutionary inferences from non‐monophyly on molecular trees
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDowden B. 2003.Fallacies. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/(accessed 11 March 2011).
no DOI — not checkedPhylogenetic Systematics
no DOI — not checkedPlant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach
no DOI — not checkedPhylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x)