Reference health
Positive rates to propyl gallate on patch testing: a change in trend
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00107-2
Evaluation of the health aspects of methyl paraben: a review of the published literature
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02126.x
Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study
resolves10.1001/archderm.1974.01630040016003
Propyl Gallate-Contact Sensitization and Orally-Induced Tolerance
resolves10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00238.x
The sensitizing capacity of the antioxidants propyl, octyl, and dodecyl gallate and some related gallic acid esters
resolves10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.6794
Tolerance to Nickel: Oral Nickel Administration Induces a High Frequency of Anergic T Cells with Persistent Suppressor Activity
resolves10.4049/jimmunol.135.5.2975
Orally induced tolerance generates an efferently acting suppressor T cell and an acceptor T cell that together down-regulate contact sensitivity.
resolves10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70175-0
Nickel allergy in adolescents in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears
resolves10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.01066.x
Oral tolerance to contact allergens: a common occurrence? A review
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBergfeldW F BelsitoD V KlaassenC Det al.Amended final report of the cosmetic ingredient review expert panel. Safety assessment of propylgallate.September 13 2005.http://www.cir_safety.ors/publications.htm/
no DOI — not checkedReport from the commission on dietary food additive intake in the European Union. (retrieved fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sfp/addit_flavor/flav15_en.pdf). Published 1stOctober 2001.
no DOI — not checkedMakR K H WhiteI R WhiteJ M Let al.Lower incidence of sesquisterpene lactone sensitivityin an Asian population vs a European population: an effect of chrysanthemum tea. (submitted).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01150.x"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01150.x/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01150.x)