Reference health
Mass‐Transfer Limitations for Macroscale Bioremediation Modeling and Implications on Aquifer Clogging
21/21 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1994)120:2(379)
Model for Treatment of Trichloroethylene by Methanotrophic Biofilms
resolves10.1029/WR025i006p01413
An evaluation of mathematical models of the transport of biologically reacting solutes in saturated soils and aquifers
resolves10.1029/WR022i013p01973
Transport of dissolved hydrocarbons influenced by oxygen‐limited biodegradation: 1. Theoretical development
resolves10.1021/es970322b
Full-Scale Evaluation of <i>In Situ</i> Cometabolic Degradation of Trichloroethylene in Groundwater through Toluene Injection
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1985.tb01954.x
Waste‐Water Injection: Geochemical and Biogeochemical Clogging Processes
resolves10.1016/0169-7722(87)90015-5
The influence of mass transfer on solute transport in column experiments with an aggregated soil
resolves10.1016/0304-3894(92)85089-J
Pilot scale field studies of in situ bioremediation of chlorinated solvents
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1991.tb00527.x
Comparison Between Model Simulations and Field Results for In‐Situ Biorestoration of Chlorinated Aliphatics: Part 1. Biostimulation of Methanotrophic Bacteria
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1992.tb00809.x
Comparison Between Model Simulations and Field Results for In‐Situ Biorestoration of Chlorinated Aliphatics: Part 2. Cometabolic Transformations
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1990.tb01987.x
A Field Evaluation of In‐Situ Biodegradation of Chlorinated Ethenes: Part 2, Results of Biostimulation and Biotransformation Experiments
resolves10.1029/WR026i009p02171
Biofilm growth and the related changes in the physical properties of a porous medium: 3. Dispersivity and model verification
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1982.tb01350.x
Sulfate‐Reducing Bacteria in Ground Water from Clogging and Nonclogging Shallow Wells in the Netherlands River Region
resolves10.1029/95WR01568
Microbial Clogging of Saturated Soils and Aquifer Materials: Evaluation of Mathematical Models
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAWWA Standard for Water Wells (A100‐90)
no DOI — not checkedCriddle C. S. L. M.Alvarez andP. L.McCarty.1989.Microbial processes in porous media.Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Transport Processes in Porous Media Pullman Washington.
no DOI — not checkedDriscoll F. G..1986.Groundwater and Wells.St. Paul Minnesota: Johnson Filtration Systems.
no DOI — not checkedDykaar B. B.1994.Macroflow and macrotransport in porous media.Ph.D. thesis Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University Stanford California.
no DOI — not checkedFundamentals of Soil Physics
no DOI — not checkedASCE Engineering Hydrology
no DOI — not checkedMacDonald T. R..1995.Flow from a recirculation well for enhanced in situ bioremediation.Ph.D. thesis Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University Stanford California.
no DOI — not checkedBioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents
no DOI — not checkedOdencrantz J. E. A. J.Valocchi andB.E.Rittmann.1990.Modeling two‐dimensional solute transport with different biodegradation kinte‐ics.Paper presented at Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention Detection and Restoration Conference Houston Texas (National Ground Water Association).
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental Biotechnology, Principles and Applications
no DOI — not checkeda. Design of fixed‐film processes with a steady‐state biofilm model. Prog
no DOI — not checkedBioremediation of Chlorinated and Polycyclie Aromatic Hydrocarbon Compounds
no DOI — not checkedMass‐Transfer Operations
no DOI — not checkedA model of substrate utilization by bacterial films
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01138.x"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01138.x/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01138.x)