Reference health
Forests: Carbon sequestration, biomass energy, or both?
40/40 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 40 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1073/pnas.0710616105
Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation
resolves10.1186/s13021-016-0068-3
Assessing the INDCs’ land use, land use change, and forest emission projections
resolves10.1021/es1024004
Forest Bioenergy or Forest Carbon? Assessing Trade-Offs in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation with Wood-Based Fuels
resolves10.1111/gcbb.12245
A global meta‐analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aab9d5
Climate, economic, and environmental impacts of producing wood for bioenergy
resolves10.1021/es2030142
Economic Approach to Assess the Forest Carbon Implications of Biomass Energy
resolves10.5849/forsci.11-055
Effect of Bioenergy Demands and Supply Response on Markets, Carbon, and Land Use
resolves10.1016/j.jfe.2013.05.003
A multi-sector intertemporal optimization approach to assess the GHG implications of U.S. forest and agricultural biomass electricity expansion
resolves10.1007/s10584-017-2034-9
Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass?
resolves10.2307/1243546
Effect of Carbon Taxes and Subsidies on Optimal Forest Rotation Age and Supply of Carbon Services
resolves10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01169.x
Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023
Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/ab0d33
A review of global-local-global linkages in economic land-use/cover change models
resolves10.1029/96GB02344
BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/aa63fc
Assessing climate change impacts, benefits of mitigation, and uncertainties on major global forest regions under multiple socioeconomic and emissions scenarios
resolves10.1561/112.00000445
The Influence of Parametric Uncertainty on Projections of Forest Land Use, Carbon, and Markets
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.005
Trade of woody biomass for electricity generation under climate mitigation policy
resolves10.1023/A:1005568825306
Potential Carbon Flux from Timber Harvests and Management in the Context of a Global Timber Market
resolves10.1093/forestscience/44.2.272
Forest Harvests and Wood Products: Sources and Sinks of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedT. Kuramochi H. Fekete L. Luna M. J. de Villafranca Casas L. Nascimento F. Hans N. Höhne H. van Soest M. den Elzen K. Esmeijer M. Roelfsema Greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for major emitting countries–Analysis of current climate policies and mitigation commitments: 2018 update (New Climate Institute December 2018 Report 2018) p. 133.
no DOI — not checkedUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) EPA’s Treatment of Biogenic Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions from Stationary Sources that Use Forest Biomass for Energy Production (2018); https://epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-04/documents/biomass_policy_statement_2018_04_23.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Union (EU) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC 5 (Official Journal of the European Union 2009); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF.
no DOI — not checkedJ. Rogelj D. Shindell K. Jiang S. Fifita P. Forster V. Ginzburg C. Handa H. Kheshgi S. Kobayashi E. Kriegler L. Mundaca R. Séférian M. V. Vilariño Chapter 2: Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development in Global Warming of 1.5 °C an IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change V. Masson-Delmotte P. Zhai H.-O. Pörtner D. Roberts J. Skea P. R. Shukla A. Pirani W. Moufouma-Okia C. Péan R. Pidcock S. Connors J. B. R. Matthews Y. Chen X. Zhou M. I. Gomis E. Lonnoy T. Maycock M. Tignor T. Waterfield Eds. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2018).
no DOI — not checkedT. Walker P. Cardellichio A. Colnes J. Gunn B. Kittler B. Perschel F. Guild C. Recchia D. Saah Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study (Manomet Centre for Conservation Sciences Brunswick ME USA 2010) 182 p.
no DOI — not checkedA. Favero, R. Mendelsohn, Using markets for woody biomass energy to sequester carbon in forests. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1, 75–95 (2014).
no DOI — not checkedW. H. Schlesinger B. Law J. Sterman W. R. Moomaw “Pruitt Is Wrong on Burning Forests for Energy ” New York Times . 3 May 2018.
no DOI — not checkedIIASA Shared Socioeconomic Pathway Database (2018); http://iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/Energy/SSP_Scenario_Database.html.
no DOI — not checkedInternational Energy Agency (IEA) Global Energy CO2 Status Report (ed. 2 2019). Available at https://iea.org/geco/.
no DOI — not checkedUSDA Economic Research Service Major Land Uses (2019); https://ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses/major-land-uses/#Forest-use%20land.
no DOI — not checkedR. Mendelsohn B. Sohngen Has historic forest and land management actually caused extensive carbon emissions? Journal of Forest Economics Forthcoming (2019).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1126/sciadv.aay6792"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1126/sciadv.aay6792/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1126/sciadv.aay6792)