Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedArnqvist G., Rowe L., Evolution 56, 936 (2002).
no DOI — not checkedB. G. M. Jamieson The Ultrastructure and Phylogeny of Insect Spermatozoa (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge 1987).
no DOI — not checkedPitnick S., Markow T. A., Spicer G. S., Evolution 53, 1804 (1999).
no DOI — not checkedBirkhead T. R., Evolution 54, 1057 (2000).
no DOI — not checkedG. T. Miller S. Pitnick data not shown.
no DOI — not checkedFemale and male body sizes were measured. Initial analyses of P2 by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with female and male lines as main factors and male and female sizes as covariates revealed that size and its interaction with other variables were never significant and inclusion of body sizes never improved model fit. Entering the variable “remating interval” as a covariate was only justified in the analysis for the third replicate experiment.
no DOI — not checkedG. T. Miller S. Pitnick J. Evol. Biol. in press.
no DOI — not checkedS. Pitnick unpublished data.
no DOI — not checkedM. Andersson Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press Princeton NJ 1994).
no DOI — not checkedSimmons L. W., Kotiaho J. S., Evolution 56, 1622 (2002).
no DOI — not checkedWe thank J. Reagan and D. Trinkaus for technical assistance and J. Alcock T. R. Birkhead A. Bjork W. D. Brown T. L. Karr L. A. McGraw M. Polak R. R. Snook W. T. Starmer and L. L. Wolf for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Supported by NSF grants DEB-9806649 and DEB-0075307 (S.P.).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.