Reference health
Female Eavesdropping on Male Song Contests in Songbirds
4/4 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 4 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1098/rspb.1999.0779
Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback
resolves10.1007/s102110000015
Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour
resolves10.1007/s002650050463
Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners?
resolves10.1163/156853988X00160
Extra-Pair Copulations in Black-Capped Chickadees: the Role of the Female
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSee supplemental information available on Science Online at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/296/5569/873/DC1.
no DOI — not checkedPaternity was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of two highly variable microsatellite loci. Offspring were considered extrapair young if they had one ( n = 44) or two ( n = 22) allelic mismatches with their social father. The combined exclusionary power was 0.91 given one known parent.
no DOI — not checkedWe thank R. DeBruyn A. MacDougall D. Aiama A. Boone P. Christie L. Colgan M. Cunningham S. Doucet J. Hodson B. Meigs S. Ramsay N. Vreeswyck and landowners adjacent to the study site for assistance and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada the American Ornithologists' Union the Animal Behavior Society the Association of Field Ornithologists the Frank M. Chapman Memorial Fund Queen's University and the Society of Canadian Ornithologists for funding.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1126/science.296.5569.873"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1126/science.296.5569.873/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1126/science.296.5569.873)