Reference health
General practitioners’ perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study
16/16 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 16 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1370/afm.1869
Electronic Consultations to Improve the Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface for Cardiology in the Medically Underserved: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
resolves10.1001/jama.280.15.1361
Digital Doctoring—Opportunities and Challenges in Electronic Patient-Physician Communication
resolves10.1215/03616878-2008-046
Where's the Revolution? Digital Technology and Health Care in the Internet Age
resolves10.1089/tmj.2013.0007
Utilization, Benefits, and Impact of an e-Consultation Service Across Diverse Specialties and Primary Care Providers
resolves10.1089/tmj.2013.0056
Ten Steps to Establishing an e-Consultation Service to Improve Access to Specialist Care
resolves10.1177/1357633X15572204
Internal e-consultations in an integrated multispecialty practice: a retrospective review of use, content, and outcomes
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.005
Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries
resolves10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
resolves10.1177/1357633X15582108
Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.009
Medical text-based consultations on the Internet: A 4-year study
resolves10.3399/bjgp16X685597
Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedNorwegian Directorate of Helath. Norway and Health: an introduction. 2011.
no DOI — not checkedSSB, Statistics Norway. Inforation technology use in households. 2016. https://www.ssb.no/teknologi-og-innovasjon/statistikker/ikthus/aar/2016-09-06
no DOI — not checked[Patient-physician interaction over the internet]
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251)