Reference health

Argumentation-Based Explanations in Recommender Systems

https://doi.org/10.1145/3213586.3225240
CiteStamped reference-health badge
9/9 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 9 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-28509-7_10
Designing an Explanation Interface for Proactive Recommendations in Automotive Scenarios
resolves10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.012
Empowering recommender systems using trust and argumentation
resolves10.3923/jai.2011.119.142
Interest Based Recommendations with Argumentation
resolves10.1080/13803390902776860
Decision making with and without feedback: The role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles
resolves10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5_4
Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation
resolves10.1037/h0034679
The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory.
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_15
Applying Dialogue Games to Manage Recommendation in Social Networks
resolves10.1007/s11257-017-9195-0
A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems
resolves10.1145/2043932.2043962
A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDecision-Making Deficits of Korsakoff Patients in a New Gambling Task With Explicit Rules
no DOI — not checkedTowards an argument-based music recommender system
no DOI — not checkedKahneman D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. Macmillan. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. Macmillan.
no DOI — not checkedJoint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3213586.3225240"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3213586.3225240/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3213586.3225240/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3213586.3225240)