Reference health

In-Processing Modeling Techniques for Machine Learning Fairness: A Survey

https://doi.org/10.1145/3551390
CiteStamped reference-health badge
3 of 49 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

40 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.5555/1050985
does not resolve to a known work10.5555/1642718
does not resolve to a known work10.5555/3322706.3362016
The 46 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00072
Understanding Training Efficiency of Deep Learning Recommendation Models at Scale
resolves10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011418
Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Making
resolves10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
resolves10.1177/0049124118782533
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
resolves10.1145/3292500.3330745
Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons
resolves10.1145/3306618.3314234
Putting Fairness Principles into Practice
resolves10.1145/3351095.3372864
On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness
resolves10.1145/3468264.3468536
Fair preprocessing: towards understanding compositional fairness of data transformers in machine learning pipeline
resolves10.1109/MSP.2021.3106615
Integrating Psychometrics and Computing Perspectives on Bias and Fairness in Affective Computing: A case study of automated video interviews
resolves10.24963/ijcai.2019/285
Learning Disentangled Semantic Representation for Domain Adaptation
resolves10.1089/big.2016.0047
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments
resolves10.1145/3097983.3098095
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
resolves10.1145/3133956.3134097
Use Privacy in Data-Driven Systems
resolves10.1145/3359786
Techniques for interpretable machine learning
resolves10.1145/2090236.2090255
Fairness through awareness
resolves10.18653/v1/D18-1002
Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Data
resolves10.1145/2783258.2783311
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
resolves10.1109/ICDE48307.2020.00203
An Intersectional Definition of Fairness
resolves10.1145/3447548.3467349
Maxmin-Fair Ranking
resolves10.1145/3306618.3317950
Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustness
resolves10.1007/978-981-33-6546-9
Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
resolves10.1145/3038912.3052569
Neural Collaborative Filtering
resolves10.1145/3391403.3399473
Fair Prediction with Endogenous Behavior
resolves10.1007/s10115-011-0463-8
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
resolves10.1109/ICDMW.2011.83
Fairness-aware Learning through Regularization Approach
resolves10.1145/3287560.3287592
An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning
resolves10.18653/v1/S18-2005
Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems
resolves10.1145/3292500.3330899
Paper Matching with Local Fairness Constraints
resolves10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00909
Deep Fair Clustering for Visual Learning
resolves10.18653/v1/P19-1631
Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classification
resolves10.1145/2020408.2020488
k-NN as an implementation of situation testing for discrimination discovery and prevention
resolves10.1145/3457607
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
resolves10.1111/1475-3995.00375
Multi–objective Evolutionary Algorithms for the Risk–return Trade–off in Bank Loan Management
resolves10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11553
Fair Inference on Outcomes
resolves10.1145/3306618.3314277
Active Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making
resolves10.1609/aaai.v35i3.16341
Learning Disentangled Representation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification via Fairness-aware Information Alignment
resolves10.1145/3351095.3372828
Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring
resolves10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
Justice as Fairness
resolves10.1109/CDC.2016.7798400
Disciplined convex-concave programming
resolves10.1145/3351095.3372837
Reducing sentiment polarity for demographic attributes in word embeddings using adversarial learning
resolves10.1109/ICCV.2019.00541
Balanced Datasets Are Not Enough: Estimating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Deep Image Representations
resolves10.1145/3038912.3052660
Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact
resolves10.1145/3278721.3278779
Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning
resolves10.1109/TKDE.2020.3002567
Fairness in Semi-Supervised Learning: Unlabeled Data Help to Reduce Discrimination
resolves10.1145/3447548.3467102
Contrastive Learning for Debiased Candidate Generation in Large-Scale Recommender Systems
The 40 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedTameem Adel, Zoubin Ghahramani, and Adrian Weller. 2018. Discovering interpretable representations for both deep generative and discriminative models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 50–59.
no DOI — not checkedAlekh Agarwal, Miroslav Dudík, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2019. Fair regression: Quantitative definitions and reduction-based algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 120–129.
no DOI — not checkedJulia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias. ProPublica, May 23, 2016 (2016), 139–159.
no DOI — not checkedArturs Backurs, Piotr Indyk, Krzysztof Onak, Baruch Schieber, Ali Vakilian, and Tal Wagner. 2019. Scalable fair clustering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 405–413.
no DOI — not checkedRichard Berk Hoda Heidari Shahin Jabbari Matthew Joseph Michael Kearns Jamie Morgenstern Seth Neel and Aaron Roth. 2017. A convex framework for fair regression. arXiv:1706.02409. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02409.
no DOI — not checkedAvishek Bose and William Hamilton. 2019. Compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 715–724.
no DOI — not checkedSabri Boughorbel Fethi Jarray and Abdou Kadri. 2021. Fairness in TabNet model by disentangled representation for the prediction of hospital no-show. arXiv:2103.04048. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.04048.
no DOI — not checkedSimon Caton and Christian Haas. 2020. Fairness in machine learning: A survey. arXiv:2010.04053. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04053.
no DOI — not checkedPengyu Cheng, Weituo Hao, Siyang Yuan, Shijing Si, and Lawrence Carin. 2021. FairFil: Contrastive neural debiasing method for pretrained text encoders. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
no DOI — not checkedFlavio Chierichetti, Ravi Kumar, Silvio Lattanzi, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. 2017. Fair clustering through fairlets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017).
no DOI — not checkedJacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
no DOI — not checkedPietro G. Di Stefano James M. Hickey and Vlasios Vasileiou. 2020. Counterfactual fairness: Removing direct effects through regularization. arXiv:2002.10774. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10774.
no DOI — not checkedMengnan Du, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Guanchu Wang, Ruixiang Tang, Ahmed Awadallah, and Xia Hu. 2021. Fairness via representation neutralization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021).
no DOI — not checkedMengnan Du, Fan Yang, Na Zou, and Xia Hu. 2020. Fairness in deep learning: A computational perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2020).
no DOI — not checkedHarrison Edwards and Amos Storkey. 2015. Censoring representations with an adversary. arXiv:1511.05897. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05897.
no DOI — not checkedMaya Gupta Andrew Cotter Mahdi Milani Fard and Serena Wang. 2018. Proxy fairness. arXiv:1806.11212. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.11212.
no DOI — not checkedMoritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro. 2016. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (2016).
no DOI — not checkedTatsunori Hashimoto, Megha Srivastava, Hongseok Namkoong, and Percy Liang. 2018. Fairness without demographics in repeated loss minimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1929–1938.
no DOI — not checkedRay Jiang, Aldo Pacchiano, Tom Stepleton, Heinrich Jiang, and Silvia Chiappa. 2020. Wasserstein fair classification. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 862–872.
no DOI — not checkedZhimeng Jiang Xiaotian Han Chao Fan Zirui Liu Na Zou Ali Mostafavi and Xia Hu. 2022. FMP: Toward fair graph message passing against topology bias. arXiv:2202.04187. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04187.
no DOI — not checkedMichael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2018. Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2564–2572.
no DOI — not checkedMichael P. Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy N. Rothblum. 2018. Fairness through computationally-bounded awareness. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
no DOI — not checkedÖykü Deniz Köse and Yanning Shen. 2021. Fairness-aware node representation learning. arXiv:2106.05391. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05391.
no DOI — not checkedMatt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counterfactual fairness. arXiv:1703.06856. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06856.
no DOI — not checkedPreethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee, Flavien Prost, Nithum Thain, Xuezhi Wang, and Ed H. Chi. 2020. Fairness without demographics through adversarially reweighted learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
no DOI — not checkedFrancesco Locatello, Gabriele Abbati, Thomas Rainforth, Stefan Bauer, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Olivier Bachem. 2019. On the fairness of disentangled representations. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 32. 14611–14624.
no DOI — not checkedDavid Madras, Elliot Creager, Toniann Pitassi, and Richard Zemel. 2018. Learning adversarially fair and transferable representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 3384–3393.
no DOI — not checkedDana Pessach and Erez Shmueli. 2020. Algorithmic fairness. arXiv:2001.09784. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09784.
no DOI — not checkedGeoff Pleiss, Manish Raghavan, Felix Wu, Jon Kleinberg, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. 2017. On fairness and calibration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
no DOI — not checkedYuji Roh Kangwook Lee Steven Euijong Whang and Changho Suh. 2020. Fairbatch: Batch selection for model fairness. arXiv:2012.01696. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.01696.
no DOI — not checkedAndrew Slavin Ross, Michael C. Hughes, and Finale Doshi-Velez. 2007. Right for the right reasons: Training differentiable models by constraining their explanations. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
no DOI — not checkedCropanzano Russell. 2001. Three roads to organizational justice. (2001).
no DOI — not checkedShiori Sagawa Pang Wei Koh Tatsunori B. Hashimoto and Percy Liang. 2019. Distributionally robust neural networks for group shifts: On the importance of regularization for worst-case generalization. arXiv:1911.08731. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.0873.
no DOI — not checkedMelanie Schmidt Chris Schwiegelshohn and Christian Sohler. 2018. Fair coresets and streaming algorithms for fair k-means clustering. arXiv:1812.10854. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10854.
no DOI — not checkedYujun Shen, Ceyuan Yang, Xiaoou Tang, and Bolei Zhou. 2020. Interfacegan: Interpreting the disentangled face representation learned by gans. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2020).
no DOI — not checkedYao-Hung Hubert Tsai Martin Q. Ma Han Zhao Kun Zhang Louis-Philippe Morency and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2021. Conditional contrastive learning: Removing undesirable information in self-supervised representations. arXiv:2106.02866. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02866.
no DOI — not checkedChristina Wadsworth Francesca Vera and Chris Piech. 2018. Achieving fairness through adversarial learning: An application to recidivism prediction. arXiv:1807.00199. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00199.
no DOI — not checkedAngelina Wang and Olga Russakovsky. 2021. Directional bias amplification. arXiv:2102.12594. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12594.
no DOI — not checkedMichael Wick, Swetasudha Panda, and Jean-Baptiste Tristan. 2019. Unlocking fairness: A trade-off revisited. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 8783–8792.
no DOI — not checkedMuhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rogriguez, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2017. Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 962–970.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3551390"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3551390/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3551390/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1145/3551390)