Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 91 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1021/es051689gIs Cumulative Fossil Energy Demand a Useful Indicator for the Environmental Performance of Products?
resolves10.1162/108819801753358508Wrapping Up Greenhouse Gas Emissions An Assessment of GHG Emission Reduction Related to Efficient Packaging Use: An Assessment of GHG Emission Reduction Related to Efficient Packaging Use
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.025Benchmarking the energy use of energy-intensive industries in industrialized and in developing countries
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.114Assessment of the technical and economic potentials of biomass use for the production of steam, chemicals and polymers
resolves10.1146/annurev-environ-041112-110510A Global Assessment of Manufacturing: Economic Development, Energy Use, Carbon Emissions, and the Potential for Energy Efficiency and Materials Recycling
resolves10.1093/reep/rep021The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.027Resource consumption drivers and pathways to reduction: economy, policy and lifestyle impact on material flows at the national and urban scale
resolves10.1021/es305108pCentennial Evolution of Aluminum In-Use Stocks on Our Aluminized Planet
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.002The potential contribution of sustainable waste management to energy use and greenhouse gas emission reduction in the Netherlands
resolves10.1098/rsta.2012.0003The energy required to produce materials: constraints on energy-intensity improvements, parameters of demand
resolves10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00056-7Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of primary packaging
resolves10.1021/es301093aReusing Steel and Aluminum Components at End of Product Life
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.021Assessing the potential of yield improvements, through process scrap reduction, for energy and CO2 abatement in the steel and aluminium sectors
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.006Component end-of-life management: Exploring opportunities and related benefits of remanufacturing and functional recycling
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.102Environmental modelling of aluminium recycling: a Life Cycle Assessment tool for sustainable metal management
resolves10.1021/es500820hMaTrace: Tracing the Fate of Materials over Time and Across Products in Open-Loop Recycling
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.013The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model
resolves10.1021/es302433pMapping the Global Flow of Steel: From Steelmaking to End-Use Goods
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.011Introducing the All Seeing Eye of Business: a model for understanding the nature, impact and potential uses of waste
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.021The incentives for supply chain collaboration to improve material efficiency in the use of steel: An analysis using input output techniques
resolves10.1098/rsta.2011.0567Policy for material efficiency—sustainable taxation as a departure from the throwaway society
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.127Calculating impacts of energy standards on energy demand in U.S. buildings with uncertainty in an integrated assessment model
resolves10.1002/bse.1808<i>Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash?</i> Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies
resolves10.1007/s11367-013-0697-7Reusable vs. disposable cups revisited: guidance in life cycle comparisons addressing scenario, model, and parameter uncertainties for the US consumer
resolves10.1021/es304256sMapping the Global Flow of Aluminum: From Liquid Aluminum to End-Use Goods
The 33 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion
no DOI — not checked3. Sahni S. 2013. Strategies for reducing energy demand from the materials sector. PhD thesis, Dep. Mater. Sci. Eng., Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA
no DOI — not checkedCharting Our Water Future: Economic Frameworks to Inform Decision-Making
no DOI — not checked32. UN Environ. Progr. (UNEP), Int. Res. Panel. 2011. Recycling Rates of Metals: A Status Report. Paris: UNEP
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of Recycling—State-of-the-Art for Practitioners, Analysts and Scientists
no DOI — not checkedWorking Group III—Fifth Assessment Report
no DOI — not checkedB39
no DOI — not checkedMinerals, Critical Minerals and the U.S. Economy.
no DOI — not checkedCritical Raw Materials for the EU: Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on Defining Critical Raw Materials
no DOI — not checkedOptimisation of Integrated Energy and Materials Systems. Linked Energy and Material Flows: Methodological Considerations and Model Calculations for the Netherlands Beyond 2000.
no DOI — not checkedSustainable Materials Without the Hot Air
no DOI — not checkedB54
no DOI — not checked61. Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonnesson U, van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A. 2011. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. Rome: UN Food Agric. Org.
no DOI — not checkedSIWI Policy Brief
no DOI — not checked64. Cooper DR, Gutowski TG. 2016. The environmental impacts of reuse: a review. J. Ind. Ecol.In press
no DOI — not checkedHow Much Is Enough? The Love of Money and the Case for the Good Life
no DOI — not checkedMake to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America
no DOI — not checkedThe General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes.
no DOI — not checked86. Rootzén J. 2015. Pathways to deep decarbonisation of carbon-intensive industry in the European Union. PhD thesis, Chalmers Univ. Technol., Göteborg, Swed.
no DOI — not checkedMaterializing Policies for Sustainable Use and Economy-wide Management of Resources: Biophysical Perspectives, Socio-economic Options and a Dual Approach for the European Union
no DOI — not checkedUntersuchung der Wirksamkeit des Programms zur Verbesserung der Materialeffizienz
no DOI — not checked90. Elkins P, Meyer B, Schmidt-Bleek F. 2009. Reducing resource consumption—a proposal for global resource and environmental policy. Discuss. Pap. 2009/5, Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung mbH, Osnabrück, Ger.
no DOI — not checkedOur Ecological Footprint
no DOI — not checkedSapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
no DOI — not checked102. Calif. Integr. Waste Manag. Board (CIWMB). 2003. Plastics White Paper—optimizing plastics use, recycling, and disposal in California. White Pap., CIWMB, Sacram., CA
no DOI — not checked103. Waste Res. Action Progr. (WRAP). 2009. Construction procurement guidance—delivering higher recycled content in construction. WRAP, Sept.
no DOI — not checked104. The Economist. 2013. The rise of the sharing economy: On the internet, everything is for hire. The Economist, March 9
no DOI — not checkedCoal—A Human History
no DOI — not checkedCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed
no DOI — not checkedMerchants of Doubt
no DOI — not checkedThe Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future
no DOI — not checkedBeyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development
no DOI — not checkedTowards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the Scale-up Across Global Supply Chains
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.