Reference health
On Juror Decision Making: An Empathic Inquiry
4 of 129 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-24
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
63 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0096-1523.1.3.288
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/0364-0213(89)90016-5
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-295X.103.3.490
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.602
The 125 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/h0077720
Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information.
resolves10.1080/1068316X.2011.613389
Police-induced confessions: an empirical analysis of their content and impact
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01200.x
Degree of Detail of Eyewitness Testimony and Mock Juror Judgments<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.170
Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making.
resolves10.1002/ejsp.2420240104
Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness
resolves10.1023/A:1015380522722
Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02558.x
Effects of Testimonial Inconsistencies and Witness Group Identity on Mock‐Juror Judgments<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/acp.3401
The effect of biased lineup instructions on eyewitness identification confidence
resolves10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01177.x
Juror Beliefs About Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Expert Testimony
resolves10.1375/pplt.13.1.110
The Influence of Limiting Instructions on Processing and Judgments of Emotionally Evocative Evidence
resolves10.1007/BF01044644
The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.
resolves10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00089.x
Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries
resolves10.1037/law0000060
Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database.
resolves10.1023/A:1024823706560
The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors' decisions in a murder trial: Probative or prejudicial?
resolves10.1007/s10979-009-9189-5
Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?
resolves10.1002/acp.701
The role of perceptual elaboration and individual differences in the creation of false memories for suggested events
resolves10.1177/1754073915601223
Jurors’ Emotions and Judgments of Legal Responsibility and Blame: What Does the Experimental Research Tell Us?
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<781::AID-EJSP960>3.0.CO;2-3
Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor
resolves10.1080/13218719.2018.1440468
Impact of Gruesome Photographic Evidence on Legal Decisions: A Meta-Analysis
resolves10.1037/lhb0000200
The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-483_2
Correction: <i>Corynebacterium hemolyticum</i> Causing Pharyngitis and Rash in Young Adults
resolves10.1037/a0023589
Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.3
Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction.
resolves10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5
Effects of an alibi witness’s relationship to the defendant on mock jurors’ judgments.
resolves10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.
resolves10.1177/01461672972310005
Inadmissible Testimony, Instructions to Disregard, and the Jury: Substantive Versus Procedural Considerations
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.740
Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception.
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199804)12:2<159::AID-ACP506>3.0.CO;2-J
Judgements of other people's memory reports: differences in reports as a function of imagery vividness
resolves10.1002/acp.3117
Swedish Legal Professionals' Opinions on Child and Adult Witness Memory‐reporting Capabilities: Using the Method of Indirect Comparisons
resolves10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FIT
resolves10.1037/lhb0000066
Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.181
Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and children's memory reports?
resolves10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.677
Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01151.x
Mock‐Juror Evaluations of Eyewitness Testimony: A Test of Metamemory Hypotheses<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory
resolves10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.07.003
Prevalence and severity of trauma- and stressor-related symptoms among jurors: A review
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_9
The Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts
resolves10.1002/acp.1301
Estimating the effects of misleading information on witness accuracy: can experts tell jurors something they don't already know?
resolves10.1023/A:1020278620751
"He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception.
resolves10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657
Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations
resolves10.1007/s10979-010-9257-x
Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions.
resolves10.1002/acp.1500
Innocent but proven guilty: Eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored‐video evidence
resolves10.1007/BF01499140
Inducing jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence: A legal explanation does not help.
resolves10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032
Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.288
Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning.
resolves10.1002/acp.1643
Effect of viewing the interview and identification process on juror perceptions of eyewitness accuracy
resolves10.1037/a0014560
Fast and confident: Postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
resolves10.1037/law0000009
The truth-justice tradeoff: Perceptions of decisional accuracy and procedural justice in adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems.
resolves10.1007/BF01499235
Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence.
resolves10.1023/A:1023487908640
Extra effort during memory retrieval may be associated with increases in eyewitness confidence.
resolves10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_03
Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814
The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction.
resolves10.1037/lhb0000067
Post-identification feedback to eyewitnesses impairs evaluators’ abilities to discriminate between accurate and mistaken testimony.
resolves10.1177/0963721414554394
Contamination of Eyewitness Self-Reports and the Mistaken-Identification Problem
resolves10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7
The Impact on Juror Verdicts of Judicial Instruction to Disregard Inadmissible Evidence: A Meta-Analysis.
resolves10.1037/law0000001
The eyewitness post identification feedback effect 15 years later: Theoretical and policy implications.
resolves10.1093/lpr/mgy012
Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions
resolves10.1037/lhb0000134
Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
resolves10.1007/BF01044641
Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing.
resolves10.1037//0021-9010.66.6.688
The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact.
resolves10.1037//0021-9010.66.6.682
How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading.
resolves10.1007/s10979-008-9130-3
Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later.
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.
resolves10.1037/a0039510
Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy.
resolves10.1177/1529100616686966
The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis
resolves10.1111/1467-9280.00388
Interviewing Witnesses: Forced Confabulation and Confirmatory Feedback Increase False Memories
The 63 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedWe, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy
no DOI — not checkedB5
no DOI — not checkedTheater Tips and Strategies for Jury Trials
no DOI — not checkedRemembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology
no DOI — not checkedReconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture
no DOI — not checkedCommentaries on the Laws of England
no DOI — not checkedB21
no DOI — not checkedDual-Process Theories in Social Psychology
no DOI — not checkedDescartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
no DOI — not checkedJury Decision Making: The State of the Science
no DOI — not checkedB37
no DOI — not checkedBiased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do
no DOI — not checkedPerson-Job Fit: A Conceptual Integration, Literature Review, and Methodological Critique
no DOI — not checkedThe Common Sense Rule of Trial Advocacy
no DOI — not checkedAggression: Theoretical and Empirical Reviews
no DOI — not checkedFisher RP, Schreiber N. 2007. Interview protocols for improving eyewitness memory. See Toglia et al. 2007, pp. 53–80
no DOI — not checkedA Crime of Self-Defense: Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial
no DOI — not checkedCourts on Trial
no DOI — not checkedTalks on American Law
no DOI — not checkedB52
no DOI — not checkedFigurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences
no DOI — not checkedNarrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations
no DOI — not checkedB66
no DOI — not checkedTrial Advocacy Before Judges, Jurors, and Arbitrators
no DOI — not checkedB70
no DOI — not checkedCriminal Interrogation and Confessions
no DOI — not checkedJudicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM)
no DOI — not checkedThinking, Fast and Slow
no DOI — not checkedThe American Jury
no DOI — not checkedB87
no DOI — not checkedB88
no DOI — not checkedKrulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440, 453 (1949)
no DOI — not checkedReadings on Adversarial Justice: The American Approach to Adjudication
no DOI — not checkedLego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477 (1972)
no DOI — not checkedB98
no DOI — not checkedB104
no DOI — not checkedManson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977)
no DOI — not checkedB113
no DOI — not checkedActing Skills for Lawyers
no DOI — not checkedB116
no DOI — not checkedObedience to Authority
no DOI — not checkedStrengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward
no DOI — not checkedLanguage and Thought of the Child: Selected Works
no DOI — not checkedCognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition
no DOI — not checkedCommunication and Emotion: Essays in Honor of Dolf Zillmann
no DOI — not checkedThe Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology
no DOI — not checkedTheoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension
no DOI — not checkedKnowledge and Memory: The Real Story
no DOI — not checkedB140
no DOI — not checkedB147
no DOI — not checkedB149
no DOI — not checkedB155
no DOI — not checkedB156
no DOI — not checkedB163
no DOI — not checkedProcedural Justice: A Psychological Perspective
no DOI — not checkedThe Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Vol. 1: Memory for Events
no DOI — not checkedRethinking Evidence
no DOI — not checkedUnited States v. Grunewald, 233 F.2d 556, 574 (1956)
no DOI — not checkedB172
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Juries: The Verdict
no DOI — not checkedAnchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence
no DOI — not checkedEyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives
no DOI — not checkedMotivational Analyses of Social Behavior: Building on Jack Brehm's Contributions to Psychology
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042658"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042658/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042658)