Reference health

A new species of Pelthydrus (s. str.) Orchymont, 1919 from Yunnan, China (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Hydrophilinae: Laccobiini)

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4614.3.11
CiteStamped reference-health badge
not checkable · checked 2026-07-22

This work could not be checked — none of the deposited references carry a DOI. No claim is made either way about its reference list.

1 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 1 reference without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked<p class="Reference">Bian, D., Schönmann, H. &amp; Ji, L. (2008) <em>Pelthydrus</em> Orchymont, 1919 from Hainan (China) with descriptions of three new species (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). <em>Koleopterologische Rundschau</em>, 78, 265–274.</p><p class="Reference">Bian, D., Schönmann, H. &amp; Ji, L. (2009) Five new species of <em>Pelthydrus</em> Orchymont, 1919 from China and adjacent countries (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). <em>Zootaxa</em>, 2118, 53–64.</p><p class="Reference">Hansen, M. (1999) <em>World Catalogue of Insects, Volume 2. Hydrophiloidea (s.str.) (Coleoptera).</em> Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 416 pp.</p><p class="Reference">Schönmann, H. (1994) Revision der Gattung <em>Pelthydrus</em> Orchymont. 2. Teil: <em>Pelthydrus </em>s.str. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). <em>Koleopterologische Rundschau</em>, 64, 189–222.</p><p class="Reference">Schönmann, H. (1995) Revision der Gattung <em>Pelthydrus</em> Orchymont. 2. Teil: <em>Pelthydrus </em>s.str. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). <em>Koleopterologische Rundschau</em>, 65, 105–144.</p><p class="Reference">Zhu, B., Ji, L. &amp; Bian, D. (2018) A new species and a new record of <em>Pelthydrus</em> Orchymont, 1919 from Yunnan, China (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilinae). <em>Zootaxa</em>, 4438 (1), 189–194.</p><p> https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4438.1.12</p>
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.11646/zootaxa.4614.3.11"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.11646/zootaxa.4614.3.11/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.11646/zootaxa.4614.3.11/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.11646/zootaxa.4614.3.11)