Comments on the taxonomic validity of Camptodontornis yangi (Li, Gong, Zhang, Yang, and Hou, 2010) and its relationships to Longipteryx chaoyangensis Zhang, Zhou, Hou, and Gu, 2000 and Boluochia zhengi Zhou, 1995
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a publisher retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Camptodontornis gen. nov., a replacement name for the bird genus Camptodontus Li, Gong, Zhang, Yang, and Hou, 2010, a junior homonym of Camptodontus Dejean, 1826
<strong>New material of <em>Longipteryx</em> (Aves: Enantiornithes) from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China with the first recognized avian tooth crenulations</strong>
Early diversification of birds: Evidence from a new opposite bird
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedHou, L. (2010) A new enantiornithine bird (Aves) from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. <em>Acta Palaeontologica Sinica</em>, 49 (4), 524-531.</p><p class="Reference">Martyniuk, M. (2012) <em>A Field Guide to Mesozoic Birds and Other Winged Dinosaurs</em>. Pan Aves, Vernon, New Jersey, 189 pp.</p><p class="Reference">O'Connor, J.K., Zhou, Z. &
no DOI — not checkedZelenkov, N.V. (2014) A new diverse enantiornithine family (Bohaiornithidae fam. nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information from two new species. <em>Vertebrata PalAsiatica</em>, 52 (1), 31-76.</p><p class="Reference">Wang, X., Zhao, B., Shen, C., Liu, S., Gao, C., Cheng, X. &
no DOI — not checkedGu, G. (2000) Early diversification of birds: evidence from a new opposite bird. <em>Kexue Tongbao</em>, 45, 2650-2657. [Republished as Zhang, F., Zhou, Z., Hou, L. &
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.