Reference health

CSR Communication Research: A Theoretical-cum-Methodological Perspective From Semiotics

https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319843623
CiteStamped reference-health badge
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1108/09513570410567791
The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap
resolves10.1111/joms.12058
Methodological Wishes for the Next Decade and How to Make Wishes Come True
resolves10.1177/0007650316659851
Organizational Transparency: Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences
resolves10.1007/s10551-015-2633-1
Corporate Social Responsibility in SMEs: A Shift from Philanthropy to Institutional Works?
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.004
When luxury advertising adds the identitary values of luxury: A semiotic analysis
resolves10.1007/s10551-008-9806-0
Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Study in Disingenuity?
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001
A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(78)90019-3
Linguistic relativity in accounting
resolves10.1111/1467-6486.00324
Organizational Differentiation through Badging: Investors in People and the Value of the Sign
resolves10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.006
A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication
resolves10.1177/0148558X0802300304
Quality versus Quantity: The Case of Forward-Looking Disclosure
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00972.x
Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress
resolves10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.007
Discussion of a framework for the analysis of firm risk communication
resolves10.1108/09513571011080144
Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?
resolves10.1177/0007650302250505
Coping With Paradox
resolves10.1108/09513570610651966
Cross‐sectional effects in community disclosure
resolves10.4324/9780203014936
Semiotics: The Basics
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002
The language of US corporate environmental disclosure
resolves10.1177/0007650318791780
A Communicative Constitutive Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: Ventriloquism, Undecidability, and Surprisability
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00477.x
Constructing Organizational Identities on the Web: A Case Study of Royal Dutch/Shell*
resolves10.1111/joms.12196
Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges
resolves10.1108/09513570710731236
Photographs and accountability: cracking the codes of an NGO
resolves10.1108/09513571111100708
Barthesian perspectives on accounting communication and visual images of professional accountancy
resolves10.1177/0007650318816434
Unpacking the Narrative Decontestation of CSR: Aspiration for Change or Defense of the Status Quo?
resolves10.2307/2989899
A Semiotic Analysis of Corporate Language: Organizational Boundaries and Joint Venturing
resolves10.1016/S0167-8116(88)80007-7
The contribution of structural semiotics to the design of a hypermarket
resolves10.1016/j.cpa.2007.01.006
Environmental disclosures: electric utilities and Phase 2 of the Clean Air Act
resolves10.1108/09513579510146996
Corporate social and environmental reporting
resolves10.1108/09513579510086812
Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies
resolves10.2307/2929667
The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints
resolves10.1177/0007650315575119
Stakeholder Relevance for Reporting
resolves10.1108/14691930410533704
Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting
resolves10.1108/09513579610109987
Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2004.10.003
Quantity versus quality: the impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK Plcs
resolves10.1007/s10551-009-0089-x
Cultural Competences: An Important Resource in the Industry–NGO Dialog
resolves10.4102/hts.v70i3.1971
On the role of Susanna in <i>Susanna</i>: A Greimassian contribution
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.007
A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach
resolves10.1108/09513570210425600
A literary theory perspective on accounting
resolves10.5465/amr.2007.25275683
Community isomorphism and corporate social action
resolves10.1177/0007650319825825
Aspirational Talk in Strategy Texts: A Longitudinal Case Study of Strategic Episodes in Corporate Social Responsibility Communication
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000038
A Semiotic Information Quality Framework: Development and Comparative Analysis
resolves10.3138/9781442664838
Meaning and Textuality
resolves10.1515/semi.1997.113.1-2.43
The production of values: The concept of modality in textual discourse analysis
resolves10.1006/bare.2002.0211
FIRM RESOURCES, QUALITY SIGNALS AND THE DETERMINANTS OF CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL REPUTATION: SOME UK EVIDENCE
resolves10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2015.05.004
Impact of board independence on the quality of community disclosures in annual reports
resolves10.1108/20408021211223534
Corporate community involvement disclosures in annual report
resolves10.4337/9781784710927.00022
Insights regarding the applicability of semiotics to CSR communication research
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2016.12.006
The impact of community expectations on corporate community involvement disclosures in the UK
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedbibr7-0007650319843623
no DOI — not checkedbibr8-0007650319843623
no DOI — not checkedIntroduction to the structural analysis of narratives, image, music, text
no DOI — not checkedBHP Billiton. (2012). Annual reports 2012. Retrieved from http://www.bhpbilliton.com/~/media/bhp/documents/investors/reports/2012/bhpbillitonannualreport2012.pdf?la=en
no DOI — not checkedBP Plc. (2013). Sustainability report 2013. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/sustainability/archive/archived-reports-and-translations/2013/bp-sustainability-review-2013.pdf
no DOI — not checkedBP Plc. (2014). Sustainability report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/sustainability/archive/archived-reports-and-translations/2014/sustainability-report-2014.pdf
no DOI — not checkedCentrica. (2006). Corporate responsibility report. Retrieved from https://www.centrica.com/sites/default/files/responsibility/2006_csr_report.pdf
no DOI — not checkedSemiotic analysis of discourse. The statement to the saying
no DOI — not checkedA social critique of corporate reporting: A semiotic analysis of corporate financial and environmental reporting
no DOI — not checkedThe Cambridge encyclopedia of language
no DOI — not checkedWriting and difference
no DOI — not checkedEffective company stewardship: Enhancing corporate reporting and audit
no DOI — not checkedStructural semantics
no DOI — not checkedSemiotics and language: An analytical dictionary: An analytical dictionary
no DOI — not checkedHébert L. (2011). Tools for text and image analysis: An introduction to applied semiotics (Tabler J. Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.signosemio.com/documents/Louis-Hebert-Tools-for-Texts-and-Images.pdf
no DOI — not checkedIndustry Classification Benchmark. (2017, July). Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB) (Russell Release 2.3). Retrieved from https://www.ftse.com/products/downloads/ICB_Rules.pdf
no DOI — not checkedbibr51-0007650319843623
no DOI — not checkedStyle in language
no DOI — not checkedbibr59-0007650319843623
no DOI — not checkedMorphology of the folktale
no DOI — not checkedSmith & Nephew. (2002). Annual reports and accounts, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.smithnephew.com/global/assets/pdf/corporate/ar02.pdf
no DOI — not checkedSmith & Nephew. (2003). Annual reports and accounts, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.smithnephew.com/global/assets/pdf/corporate/ar03.pdf
no DOI — not checkedSmith & Nephew. (2004). Annual reports and accounts, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.smith-nephew.com/global/assets/pdf/corporate/2004_annual_report_accounts_and_form_20-f.pdf
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0007650319843623"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0007650319843623/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0007650319843623/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0007650319843623)