Reference health

A Tale of Two Scales: Evaluating the Relationship Among Life Satisfaction, Social Capital, Income, and the Natural Environment at Individual and Neighborhood Levels in Metropolitan Baltimore

https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509338551
CiteStamped reference-health badge
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

35 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1207/s15324834basp0603_1
Probing Theories of Individual Well-being: A Comparison of Quality-of-life Models Assessing Neighborhood Satisfaction
resolves10.1006/jevp.1996.0038
A THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION
resolves10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5
Social Indicators of Well-Being
resolves10.1007/BF00302506
The stability and validity of quality of life measures
resolves10.1023/A:1019617921082
Unravelling Subjective Quality of Life: An Investigation of Individual and Community Determinants
resolves10.1051/nss:2006002
Integrative approaches to investigating human-natural systems: the Baltimore ecosystem study
resolves10.1023/A:1012478207457
The Community Well-Being Questionnaire: Theoretical Context and Initial Assessment of Its Reliability and Validity
resolves10.1086/228943
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
resolves10.1177/0013916588202001
Components of Neighborhood Satisfaction
resolves10.1007/BF00292050
The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos
resolves10.1596/0-8213-4562-1
Social capital
resolves10.1086/268586
Refusals: Who, Where and Why
resolves10.4135/9781412985925
Standardized Survey Interviewing
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50008-2
Sampling Theory
resolves10.1126/science.1150195
Global Change and the Ecology of Cities
resolves10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z
Characterization of Households and its Implications for the Vegetation of Urban Ecosystems
resolves10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001253
Theories and Methods of Telephone Surveys
resolves10.1177/01939459922044153
A Multidisciplinary Concept Analysis of Quality of Life
resolves10.1177/0013916591231001
Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences
resolves10.56021/9780801835254
Bay Country
resolves10.1086/317759
Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1983.tb00703.x
Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Metropolitan-Level Analysis
resolves10.1007/978-1-349-15213-1
Principles of Economics
resolves10.1002/jcop.1048
Factorial structure of the Perceived Neighborhood Scale (PNS): A test of longitudinal invariance
resolves10.1177/0021886300361002
Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities
resolves10.1080/0042098022000027031
What Makes People Dissatisfied with their Neighbourhoods?
resolves10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
Urban Ecological Systems: Linking Terrestrial Ecological, Physical, and Socioeconomic Components of Metropolitan Areas
resolves10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01586.x
Advancing urban ecological studies: Frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study
resolves10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X
Social Capital and the Environment
resolves10.1038/427772a
Taking the voters' pulse
resolves10.1126/science.277.5328.918
Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy
resolves10.1002/acp.2350050304
The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement
resolves10.1023/A:1016021108513
How Neighborhood Features Affect Quality of Life
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50011-2
Applied Sampling
resolves10.1007/s00267-006-0112-2
Predicting Opportunities for Greening and Patterns of Vegetation on Private Urban Lands
resolves10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments
The 35 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAckerman, F. ( 1997). Utility and welfare: The history of economic thought . In F. Ackerman, D. Kiron, N. R. Goodwin, J. M. Harris, & K. Gallagher (Eds.), Human well-being and economic goals (pp. 49-57). Washington DC: Island Press.
no DOI — not checkedHuman well-being and economic goals
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Heritage College Dictionary
no DOI — not checkedArgyle, M. ( 1996). Subjective well-being. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of quality of life (pp. 18-45). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedMeasurement error in surveys
no DOI — not checkedBordieu, P. ( 1983). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
no DOI — not checkedMaryland biological stream survey data: Benthic index of biotic integrity
no DOI — not checkedatypb13
no DOI — not checkedatypb14
no DOI — not checkedAustralian unity well-being Index, Survey 2: Report 2: Special report on income and geographic location
no DOI — not checkedDiener, E. & Lucas, R. ( 1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213-229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
no DOI — not checkedMail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method
no DOI — not checkedatypb26
no DOI — not checkedTrust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity
no DOI — not checkedInterdisciplinary perspectives on well being
no DOI — not checkedThe new urban sociology
no DOI — not checkedGrove, J.M., Burch, W.R. & Pickett, S.T.A. (2005). Social mosaics and urban forestry in Baltimore, Maryland. In R. G. Lee & D. R. Field (Eds.), Communities and forests: Where people meet the land (2nd ed., pp. 248-273). Corvalis: Oregon State University Press.
no DOI — not checkedHouse, C.C. & Nicholls, W.L. (1988). Questionnaire design for CATI: Design objectives and methods. In R. M. Groves (Ed.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 421-436). New York: John Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedWorld Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997, ICPSR Version
no DOI — not checkedThe ghost map: The story of London’s most terrifying epidemic- and how it changed science, cities, and the modern world
no DOI — not checkedatypb41
no DOI — not checkedThe Experience of Nature
no DOI — not checkedKiron, D. ( 1997). Economics and the good, I: Individuals: Overview essay . In F. Ackerman, D. Kiron, N. R. Goodwin, J. M. Harris & K. Gallagher (Eds.), Human Well-Being and Economic Goals (pp. 165-173). Washington D.C.: Island Press.
no DOI — not checkedUrban fortunes: The political economy of place
no DOI — not checkedPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research
no DOI — not checkedMarans, R.W. & Rodgers, W. ( 1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In A. H. Hawley & V. P. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in comtemporary perspective (pp. 299-352). New York: Sage, Halsted Press Division, John Wiley .
no DOI — not checkedJob satisfaction, marital satisfaction, and the quality of life: A review and a preview
no DOI — not checkedOstrom, E. ( 1999). Social capital: A fad or a fundamental concept? In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 172-214). Washington DC: World Bank.
no DOI — not checkedatypb58
no DOI — not checkedvan Praag, B.M.S. & Frijters, P. ( 1999). The measurement of welfare and well-being: The Leyden approach. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of Hedonic psychology (pp. 593). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
no DOI — not checkedThe contribution of natural capital to quality of life: A multi-scale analysis at the county, region, and global scales
no DOI — not checkedThe clustering of America
no DOI — not checkedThe clustered world: How we live, what we buy, and what it all means about who we are
no DOI — not checkedGenesee county quality of life report: A quarter century of challenge
no DOI — not checkedatypb71
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0013916509338551"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0013916509338551/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0013916509338551/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0013916509338551)